Quantifying chaos: practical estimation of the correlation dimension

Be it a physical object or a mathematical model, a nonlinear dynamical system can display complicated aperiodic behavior, or "chaos." In many cases, this chaos is associated with motion on a strange attractor in the system's phase space. And the dimension of the strange attractor indicates the effective number of degrees of freedom in the dynamical system.

In this thesis, we investigate numerical issues involved with estimating the dimension of a strange attractor from a finite time series of measurements on the dynamical system.

Of the various definitions of dimension, we argue that the correlation dimension is the most efficiently calculable and we remark further that it is the most commonly calculated. We are concerned with the practical problems that arise in attempting to compute the correlation dimension. We deal with geometrical effects (due to the inexact self-similarity of the attractor), dynamical effects (due to the nonindependence of points generated by the dynamical system that defines the attractor), and statistical effects (due to the finite number of points that sample the attractor). We propose a modification of the standard algorithm, which eliminates a specific effect due to autocorrelation, and a new implementation of the correlation algorithm, which is computationally efficient.

Finally, we apply the algorithm to chaotic data from the Caltech tokamak and the Texas tokamak (TEXT); we conclude that plasma turbulence is not a low- dimensional phenomenon.

Norbornenyl- and nortricyclyl free radicals

The number, symmetry, and product-forming capabilities of the intermediates in the photoinitiated reductions of endo- and exo-5- bromonorbornene and 2-bromonortricyclene with tri-n-butyltin hydride at temperatures between -10° and 22° were investigated.

Three mechanisms were evaluated:

1. The 5-norbornenyl- and 2-nortricyclyl radicals isomerize reversibly with the former producing nortricyclene by abstraction of hydrogen from tri-n-butyltin hydride.

2. The 5-norbornenyl- and 2-nortricyclyl radicals isomerize reversibly, but some norbornene can be formed from the 2-nortricyclyl radical or some nortricyclene can be formed from the 5-norbornenyl radical by abstraction of hydrogen.

3. There is intervention of a "bridged" radical which may be for med reversibly or irreversibly from the 5-norbornenyl- and 2-nortricyclyl radicals.

Within small error limits, the ratios of norbornene to nortricyclene as a function of the concentration of tri-n-butyltin hydride are consistent with the first mechanism.

In the reductions with tri-n-butyltin deuteride, primary deuterium isotope effects of 2. 3 and 2. 1 for the abstraction of deuterium by the 2-nortricyclyl- and 5-norbornenyl radicals, respectively, were found. The primary deuterium isotope effects were invariant with the concentration of tri-n-butyltin deuteride, although the ratios of norbornene to nortricyclene changed appreciably over this range. This is consistent with the first mechanism, and can accommodate the formation of either product from more than one intermediate only if the primary kinetic deuterium isotope effects are nearly equal for all reactions leading to the single product.

The reduction of endo-5-bromonorbornene-5, 6, 6-d₃ with tri-n-butyltin hydride or tri-n-butyltin deuteride leads to both unrearranged and rearranged norbornenes. The ratios of unrearranged to rearranged norbornene require that the 5-norbornenyl-5, 6, 6-d₃ radical isomerize to an intermediate with the symmetry expected of a nortricyclyl free radical. The results are consistent with mechanism 1, but imply a surprising normal secondary kinetic deuterium isotope effect of about 1.25 for the abstraction of hydrogen by the 5-norbornenyl- 5, 6, 6-d₃ radical.

Approximate calculations show that there does not appear to be any substantial difference in the stabilities of the 5-norbornenyl and 2-nortricyclyl radicals.

Although the results can not exclude a small contribution by a mechanism other than mechanism 1, no such contribution is required to adequately explain the results.