Negative regulators of a growth factor-mediated signaling pathway in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Vulval differentiation in C. elegans is mediated by an Epidermal growth factor (EGF)- EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway. I have cloned unc-101, a negative regulator of vulval differentiation of the nematode C. elegans. unc-101 encodes a homolog of AP47, the medium chain of the trans-Golgi clathrin-associated protein complex. This identity was confirmed by cloning and comparing sequence of a C. elegans homolog of AP50, the medium chain of the plasma membrane clathrin-associated protein complex. I provided the first genetic evidence that the trans-Golgi clathrin-coated vesicles are involved in regulation of an EGF signaling pathway. Most of the unc-101 alleles are deletions or nonsense mutations, suggesting that these alleles severely reduce the unc-101 activity. A hybrid gene that contains parts of unc-101 and mouse AP4 7 rescued at least two phenotypes of unc-101 mutations, the Unc and the suppression of vulvaless phenotype of let-23(sy1) mutation. Therefore, the functions of AP47 are conserved between nematodes and mammals.

unc-101 mutations can cause a greater than wild-type vulval differentiation in combination with certain mutations in sli-1, another negative regulator of the vulval induction pathway. A mutation in a new gene, rok-1, causes no defect by itself, but causes a greater than wild-type vulval differentiation in the presence of a sli-1 mutation. The unc-101; rok-1; sli-1 triple mutants display a greater extent of vulval differentiation than any double mutant combinations of unc-101, rok-1 and sli-1. Therefore, rok-1 locus defines another negative regulator of the vulval induction pathway.

I analyzed a second gene encoding an AP47 homolog in C. elegans. This gene, CEAP47, encodes a protein 72% identical to both unc-101 and mammalian AP47. A hybrid gene containing parts of unc-101 and CEAP47 sequences can rescue phenotypes of unc-101 mutants, indicating that UNC- 101 and CEAP47 proteins can be redundant if expressed in the same set of cells.

Comparative studies of Vulva development in C. briggsae

As evolution progresses, developmental changes occur. Genes lose and gain molecular partners, regulatory sequences, and new functions. As a consequence, tissues evolve alternative methods to develop similar structures, more or less robust. How this occurs is a major question in biology. One method of addressing this question is by examining the developmental and genetic differences between similar species. Several studies of nematodes Pristionchus pacificus and Oscheius CEW1 have revealed various differences in vulval development from the well-studied C. elegans (e.g. gonad induction, competence group specification, and gene function.)

I approached the question of developmental change in a similar manner by using Caenorhabditis briggsae, a close relative of C. elegans. C. briggsae allows the use of transgenic approaches to determine developmental changes between species. We determined subtle changes in the competence group, in 1° cell specification, and vulval lineage.

We also analyzed the let-60 gene in four nematode species. We found conservation in the codon identity and exon-intron boundaries, but lack of an extended 3' untranslated region in Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Studies on hymenopteran parasitism of Drosophila

Studies on Hymenopteran Parasitism of Drosophila

Flies of the genus Drosophila are subject to attack by a number of parasitic forms. Sturtevant (1921) has listed records of parasitism by protozoa (Leptomonas), fungi (Muiaria and Stigmatomyces), nematodes, mites and v~rious hymenoptera. According to Sturtevant, Perkins (1913) has bred at least five species of hymenoptera, belonging to the proctotrupoid, cynipoid and chalcidoid groups, upon Drosophiline flies. H.S. Smith has bred an unidentified proctotrupoid and a chalcidoid, Pachy crepoideus dubius Ashmead* from both Drosophila melanogaster ani D. hydei. Kieffer ( 1913) has described three species of hymenoptera from Africa collected by Silvestri and stated by him to be parasitic on Drosophila, species not given. They are Trichopria (Planopria) rhopalica (Diapriidae), Ashmeadopria drosophilae (Diapriidae), and the insect which forms the subject matter of the present investigation, Eucoila drosophilae (Figitidae).

There are in addition a number of predacious enemies among wasps, spiders, flies and beetles.

The present account is concerned with parasitism of various species of Drosophila by Eucoila drosophilae Kieff. The wasps were found b y Dr. w. P. Spencer who exposed traps in an effort to collect Drosophila at Long Lake, Ohio, in Sept. 1934 . Drosophila larvae from the trap gave a large number of pupae from which wasps emerged in considerable proportions. Since that time stock s have been maintained in culture on Drosophila melanogaster.