8 resultados para Educational processes
em Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Resumo:
This document explains the process of designing a methodology to evaluate Educational Innovation Groups, which are structures created within universities in the context of adaptation to the European Higher Education Area. These groups are committed to introduce innovation in educational processes as a means to improve educational quality. The assessment design is based on a participatory model of planning called Working With People, that tries to integrate the perspectives of all stakeholders. The aim of the methodology is to be a useful tool for the university to evaluate the work done by the groups, encourage the members to continue improving the quality of teaching and reorient the activities to fulfill the emergent needs that the university faces.
Resumo:
In recent years, the continuous incorporation of new technologies in the learning process has been an important factor in the educational process [1]. The Technical University of Madrid (UPM) promotes educational innovation processes and develops projects related to the improvement of the education quality. The experience that we present fits into the Educational Innovation Project (EIP) of the E.U. of Agricultural Engineering of Madrid. One of the main objectives of the EIP is to "Take advantage of the new opportunities offered by the Learning and Knowledge Technologies in order to enrich the educational processes and teaching management" [2].
Resumo:
In recent years, the continuous incorporation of new technologies in the learning process has been an important factor in the educational process (1). The Technical University of Madrid (UPM) promotes educational innovation processes and develops projects related to the improvement of the education quality. The experience that we present fits into the Educational Innovation Project (EIP) of the E.U. of Agricultural Engineering of Madrid. One of the main objectives of the EIP is to Take advantage of the new opportunities offered by the Learning and Knowledge Technologies in order to enrich the educational processes and teaching management (2).
Resumo:
El taller de proyectos constituye el núcleo de la enseñanza arquitectónica. Estudiar sus procesos educativos en la actualidad implica la contextualización teórica del acto educativo y la revisión histórica de la evolución de su estructura social. Esta estructura, es heredera de la larga tradición del taller donde los maestros de obra, artesanos, arquitectos y artistas, se ocupaban desde siempre de la enseñanza de la construcción, de la artesanía, del diseño arquitectónico y del arte. Los aprendices se sometían a la autoridad de sus maestros y pasaban horas practicando, produciendo y aprendiendo junto a ellos. Con la aparición de las primeras Academias de arte y posteriormente de arquitectura, se evidenció un progresivo interés de los Estados hacía los productos artísticos y arquitectónicos. La consideración de las artes y de la arquitectura como proyecto estatal, supuso la construcción lenta, pero consolidable, de un proyecto educativo paralelo, coexistiendo simultáneamente con los talleres de los maestros, pero sin posibilidad de integración, hasta mucho más tarde. La “teoría”, que es de lo que se ocupaba la academia, con la “práctica” que es lo que se desarrollaba en el taller, no encontraban fácilmente la manera de encajarse y complementarse mutuamente en un proyecto educativo común. Las concepciones educativas de ambos, afrontaban la enseñanza y el aprendizaje desde puntos de vista también diferentes; mientras la Academia representaba el conocimiento validado y explicitado, en el taller se trabajaba con un conocimiento tácito e implícito. En la práctica artística del taller era donde se producía el aprendizaje mientras que en la Academia es donde se validaba. Esta estructura llegó en muchas ocasiones a situaciones extremas, no siendo casual que las más grandes crisis registradas en la historia de la enseñanza de las artes, coincidieran con un aumento de la distancia entre estas dos “instituciones”, talleres y academias. Por otra parte, parece que cualquier proyecto o concepto innovador, se ha fundado sobre la redistribución de estos equilibrios perdidos. En dicho contexto, en el campo de la educación y especialmente en el siglo XX, surge un debate que se estructura en base a los fines de la educación, contemplando dos posturas bien diferenciadas. Una de ellas sostiene como fin primordial de la educación, el desarrollo de la conciencia y la reciprocidad social del individuo. La otra, fija como fin el desarrollo de su singularidad. La búsqueda del equilibrio entre ambas, parte del interés por fomentar el crecimiento de lo que cada ser humano posee de individual, armonizándolo con la unidad orgánica del grupo social al que pertenece (Read 2010, 33). Sobre esta tensión se han basado muchos de los discursos pedagógicos y especialmente los aquí usados. La estructura social en los talleres de proyectos arquitectónicos, presenta hoy día una máxima integración entre las dos instituciones, el taller y la Academia, tanto a nivel del espacio, donde tiene lugar la enseñanza, como a nivel conceptual y pedagógico. Los talleres de proyectos poseen un formato de enseñanza y aprendizaje que constituye un paradigma (Schön, 2008) no solo dentro, sino también fuera del campo arquitectónico. Bajo este formato se complementa el aprendizaje práctico con el teórico y la producción, con la validación del conocimiento. Aunque tal estructura pedagógica presenta importantes variaciones entre unas escuelas de arquitectura y otras, los principales procesos que tienen lugar, son lo suficientemente similares, como para poder ser examinados desde una perspectiva común. Esta investigación, estudia el taller de proyectos desde un aspecto pedagógico, que contempla tanto los discursos educativos, como la historia de la evolución del taller como constructo social. El análisis se estructura sobre los elementos fundantes del acto didáctico: un sujeto que aprende, un sujeto que enseña, un método, la estrategia o procedimiento a través del que se enseña, un contenido y el propio acto docente (Sánchez Cerezo, 1994, 530). Además, se han añadido otros dos elementos que se consideran fundamentales para llevar a cabo el estudio: el contexto de la enseñanza, tanto el tangible como el intangible y la evaluación de la enseñanza y del aprendizaje. El caso de estudio de la presente investigación se sitúa en la Escuela de Arquitectura de Madrid en la actualidad. Sin embargo, no se pretende generar un retrato exacto de esta institución sino utilizarla como ejemplo principal en el desarrollo de los capítulos del método, contenido, acto docente y contexto, en los que también se introducen ejemplos de otras escuelas de arquitectura que amplían los argumentos presentados que constituyen la contextualización teórica del acto pedagógico en los talleres de proyectos arquitectónicos. ABSTRACT Design studio constitutes the core of architectural education. To study its current educational processes involves a theoretical approach of its educational praxis and an historic revision of how its social structure evolved. This structure is inherited from the long tradition of the workshop in which master masons, craftsmen, architects and artists have always been in charge of teaching construction, crafts, architectural design and art. Apprentices were subjected to the authority of their teachers and spent hours practicing, producing and learning along with them. With the establishment of the first Academies of Art and later of Architecture, the interest of the State in artistic and architectural products started growing. The understanding of arts and architecture as a state project entailed the slow, but robust development of a parallel education project. This project coexisted with the masters’ workshops, without the possibility of integration between two, until much later. It was difficult to find a way to synthesize academic “theory” with workshop “practice”. The workshops’ and the Academy's conception about teaching and learning differed significantly. While the Academy represented a verified and explicit knowledge, the workshop worked with a tacit and implicit knowledge. The workshops produced education through artistic practice, while the the Academy organized and verified knowledge. This dual framework has on occasions reached extremes. It is no accident that the biggest known crises in the history of arts education coincide with an increase in the distance between these two "institutions", the workshops and Academies. Furthermore, it seems that most innovative concepts or projects have been founded on restoring the lost balance between the two. In this context, in the field of education, and especially during the 20th century, a debate that contemplated the purpose of education and resulted in two quite differentiated approaches, emerged,. One position claims as the primary purpose of education the development of social awareness and mutuality in individuals. The other approach sets as a purpose developing each student's uniqueness. The quest for the right balance between these two positions is based on the assumption that the general purpose of education is to foster the growth of what is individual in each human being, at the same time harmonizing the individuality thus educed with the organic unity of the social group to which the individual belongs (Read, 2010, 33). This tension forms the basis for many pedagogical discourses, especially the ones utilized in this dissertation. The social structure of architecture studios today demonstrates a very high level of integration between the two institutions, the workshop and the Academy, both in terms of space —where the teaching takes place— as well as on a conceptual and pedagogical level. Architecture studios today have developed a format for teaching and learning that has established a paradigm (Schön, 2008) , not only in architecture, but also in other fields. Under this paradigm, practical and theoretical learning, as well as production and verification of knowledge, complement each other. And although this pedagogical structure presents important variations among different schools of architecture, the principal processes that take place in the studio are sufficiently similar so as to be examined from a common perspective. This research examines the architecture studio from a pedagogical point of view, that takes into account both the educational discourses, as well as the historical evolution of the workshop as a social structure. The analysis presented here is structured on the fundamentals of the teaching act: an individual learning, an individual teaching, a method, strategy or procedure for teaching and learning, the content and the teaching act itself (Sánchez Cerezo, 1994, 530). Two extra elements that were considered essential for carrying out this study have also been added: the context in which teaching takes place, tangible as well as intangible, and the evaluation of teaching and learning. The Madrid School of Architecture in the present day served as a case study. However the aim is not to generate an accurate portrayal of this school but to use it as the principal example for the development of the chapters of method, content, teaching act and context. In addition to that, examples from other schools of architecture are introduced in order to further the presented arguments that constitute the theoretical contextualization of the pedagogical act in architecture studios.
Resumo:
The adaptation to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) is becoming a great challenge for the University Community, especially for its teaching and research staff, which is involved actively in the teaching-learning process. It is also inducing a paradigm change for lecturers and students. Among the methodologies used for processes of teaching innovation, system thinking plays an important role when working mainly with mind maps, and is focused to highlighting the essence of the knowledge, allowing its visual representation. In this paper, a method for using these mind maps for organizing a particular subject is explained. This organization is completed with the definition of duration, precedence relationships and resources for each of these activities, as well as with their corresponding monitoring. Mind maps are generated by means of the MINDMANAGER package whilst Ms-PROJECT is used for establishing tasks relationships, durations, resources, and monitoring. Summarizing, a procedure and the necessary set of applications for self organizing and managing (timed) scheduled teaching tasks has been described in this paper.
Resumo:
The adaptation to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) is becoming a great challenge for the University Community, especially for its teaching and research staff, which is involved actively in the teaching-learning process. It is also inducing a paradigm change for lecturers and students. Among the methodologies used for processes of teaching innovation, system thinking plays an important role when working mainly with mind maps, and is focused to highlighting the essence of the knowledge, allowing its visual representation. In this paper, a method for using these mind maps for organizing a particular subject is explained. This organization is completed with the definition of duration, precedence relationships and resources for each of these activities, as well as with their corresponding monitoring. Mind maps are generated by means of the MINDMANAGER package whilst Ms-PROJECT is used for establishing tasks relationships, durations, resources, and monitoring. Summarizing, a procedure and the necessary set of applications for self organizing and managing (timed) scheduled teaching tasks has been described in this paper
Resumo:
In this work, educational software for intuitive understanding of the basic dynamic processes of semiconductor lasers is presented. The proposed tool is addressed to the students of optical communication courses, encouraging self consolidation of the subjects learned in lectures. The semiconductor laser model is based on the well known rate equations for the carrier density, photon density and optical phase. The direct modulation of the laser is considered with input parameters which can be selected by the user. Different options for the waveform, amplitude and frequency of thpoint. Simulation results are plotted for carrier density and output power versus time. Instantaneous frequency variations of the laser output are numerically shifted to the audible frequency range and sent to the computer loudspeakers. This results in an intuitive description of the “chirp” phenomenon due to amplitude-phase coupling, typical of directly modulated semiconductor lasers. In this way, the student can actually listen to the time resolved spectral content of the laser output. By changing the laser parameters and/or the modulation parameters,consequent variation of the laser output can be appreciated in intuitive manner. The proposed educational tool has been previously implemented by the same authors with locally executable software. In the present manuscript, we extend our previous work to a web based platform, offering improved distribution and allowing its use to the wide audience of the web.
Resumo:
Currently, student dropout rates are a matter of concern among universities. Many research studies, aimed at discovering the causes, have been carried out. However, few solutions, that could serve all students and related problems, have been proposed so far. One such problem is caused by the lack of the "knowledge chain educational links" that occurs when students move onto higher studies without mastering their basic studies. Most regulated studies imparted at universities are designed so that some basic subjects serve as support for other, more complicated, subjects, thus forming a complicated knowledge network. When a link in this chain fails, student frustration occurs as it prevents him from fully understanding the following educational links. In this proposal we try to mitigate these disasters that stem, for the most part, the student?s frustration beyond his college stay. On one hand, we make a dissertation on the student?s learning process, which we divide into a series of phases that amount to what we call the "learning lifecycle." Also, we analyze at what stage the action by the stakeholders involved in this scenario: teachers and students; is most important. On the other hand, we consider that Information and Communication Technologies ICT, such as Cloud Computing, can help develop new ways, allowing for the teaching of higher education, while easing and facilitating the student?s learning process. But, methods and processes need to be defined as to direct the use of such technologies; in the teaching process in general, and within higher education in particular; in order to achieve optimum results. Our methodology integrates, as another actor, the ICT into the "Learning Lifecycle". We stimulate students to stop being merely spectators of their own education, and encourage them to take an active part in their training process. To do this, we offer a set of useful tools to determine not only academic failure causes, (for self assessment), but also to remedy these failures (with corrective actions); "discovered the causes it is easier to determine solutions?. We believe this study will be useful for both students and teachers. Students learn from their own experience and improve their learning process, while obtaining all of the "knowledge chain educational links? required in their studies. We stand by the motto "Studying to learn instead of studying to pass". Teachers will also be benefited by detecting where and how to strengthen their teaching proposals. All of this will also result in decreasing dropout rates.