Condicionantes de la adherencia y anclaje en el refuerzo de muros de fábrica con elementos de fibras

Es cada vez más frecuente la rehabilitación de patrimonio construido, tanto de obras deterioradas como para la adecuación de obras existentes a nuevos usos o solicitaciones. Se ha considerado el estudio del refuerzo de obras de fábrica ya que constituyen un importante número dentro del patrimonio tanto de edificación como de obra civil (sistemas de muros de carga o en estructuras principales porticadas de acero u hormigón empleándose las fábricas como cerramiento o distribución con elementos autoportantes). A la hora de reparar o reforzar una estructura es importante realizar un análisis de las deficiencias, caracterización mecánica del elemento y solicitaciones presentes o posibles; en el apartado 1.3 del presente trabajo se refieren acciones de rehabilitación cuando lo que se precisa no es refuerzo estructural, así como las técnicas tradicionales más habituales para refuerzo de fábricas que suelen clasificarse según se trate de refuerzos exteriores o interiores. En los últimos años se ha adoptado el sistema de refuerzo de FRP, tecnología con origen en los refuerzos de hormigón tanto de elementos a flexión como de soportes. Estos refuerzos pueden ser de láminas adheridas a la fábrica soporte (SM), o de barras incluidas en rozas lineales (NSM). La elección de un sistema u otro depende de la necesidad de refuerzo y tipo de solicitación predominante, del acceso para colocación y de la exigencia de impacto visual. Una de las mayores limitaciones de los sistemas de refuerzo por FRP es que no suele movilizarse la resistencia del material de refuerzo, produciéndose previamente fallo en la interfase con el soporte con el consecuente despegue o deslaminación; dichos fallos pueden tener un origen local y propagarse a partir de una discontinuidad, por lo que es preciso un tratamiento cuidadoso de la superficie soporte, o bien como consecuencia de una insuficiente longitud de anclaje para la transferencia de los esfuerzos en la interfase. Se considera imprescindible una caracterización mecánica del elemento a reforzar. Es por ello que el trabajo presenta en el capítulo 2 métodos de cálculo de la fábrica soporte de distintas normativas y también una formulación alternativa que tiene en cuenta la fábrica histórica ya que su caracterización suele ser más complicada por la heterogeneidad y falta de clasificación de sus materiales, especialmente de los morteros. Una vez conocidos los parámetros resistentes de la fábrica soporte es posible diseñar el refuerzo; hasta la fecha existe escasa normativa de refuerzos de FRP para muros de fábrica, consistente en un protocolo propuesto por la ACI 440 7R-10 que carece de mejoras por tipo de anclaje y aporta valores muy conservadores de la eficacia del refuerzo. Como se ha indicado, la problemática principal de los refuerzos de FRP en muros es el modo de fallo que impide un aprovechamiento óptimo de las propiedades del material. Recientemente se están realizando estudios con distintos métodos de anclaje para estos refuerzos, con lo que se incremente la capacidad última y se mantenga el soporte ligado al refuerzo tras la rotura. Junto con sistemas de anclajes por prolongación del refuerzo (tanto para láminas como para barras) se han ensayado anclajes con llaves de cortante, barras embebidas, o anclajes mecánicos de acero o incluso de FRP. Este texto resume, en el capítulo 4, algunas de las campañas experimentales llevadas a cabo entre los años 2000 y 2013 con distintos anclajes. Se observan los parámetros fundamentales para medir la eficacia del anclajes como son: el modo de fallo, el incremento de resistencia, y los desplazamientos que permite observar la ductilidad del refuerzo; estos datos se analizan en función de la variación de: tipo de refuerzo incluyéndose el tipo de fibra y sistema de colocación, y tipo de anclaje. Existen también parámetros de diseño de los propios anclajes. En el caso de barras embebidas se resumen en diámetro y material de la barra, acabado superficial, dimensiones y forma de la roza, tipo de adhesivo. En el caso de anclajes de FRP tipo pasador la caracterización incluye: tipo de fibra, sistema de fabricación del anclajes y diámetro del mismo, radio de expansión del abanico, espaciamiento longitudinal de anclajes, número de filas de anclajes, número de láminas del refuerzo, longitud adherida tras el anclaje; es compleja la sistematización de resultados de los autores de las campañas expuestas ya que algunos de estos parámetros varían impidiendo la comparación. El capítulo 5 presenta los ensayos empleados para estas campañas de anclajes, distinguiéndose entre ensayos de modo I, tipo tracción directa o arrancamiento, que servirían para sistemas NSM o para cuantificar la resistencia individual de anclajes tipo pasador; ensayos de modo II, tipo corte simple, que se asemeja más a las condiciones de trabajo de los refuerzos. El presente texto se realiza con objeto de abrir una posible investigación sobre los anclajes tipo pasador, considerándose que junto con los sistemas de barra embebida son los que permiten una mayor versatilidad de diseño para los refuerzos de FRP y siendo su eficacia aún difícil de aislar por el número de parámetros de diseño. Rehabilitation of built heritage is becoming increasingly frequent, including repair of damaged works and conditioning for a new use or higher loads. In this work it has been considered the study of masonry wall reinforcement, as most buildings and civil works have load bearing walls or at least infilled masonry walls in concrete and steel structures. Before repairing or reinforcing an structure, it is important to analyse its deficiencies, its mechanical properties and both existing and potential loads; chapter 1, section 4 includes the most common rehabilitation methods when structural reinforcement is not needed, as well as traditional reinforcement techniques (internal and external reinforcement) In the last years the FRP reinforcement system has been adopted for masonry walls. FRP materials for reinforcement were initially used for concrete pillars and beams. FRP reinforcement includes two main techniques: surface mounted laminates (SM) and near surface mounted bars (NSM); one of them may be more accurate according to the need for reinforcement and main load, accessibility for installation and aesthetic requirements. One of the main constraints of FRP systems is not reaching maximum load for material due to premature debonding failure, which can be caused by surface irregularities so surface preparation is necessary. But debonding (or delamination for SM techniques) can also be a consequence of insufficient anchorage length or stress concentration. In order to provide an accurate mechanical characterisation of walls, chapter 2 summarises the calculation methods included in guidelines as well as alternative formulations for old masonry walls as historic wall properties are more complicated to obtain due to heterogeneity and data gaps (specially for mortars). The next step is designing reinforcement system; to date there are scarce regulations for walls reinforcement with FRP: ACI 440 7R-10 includes a protocol without considering the potential benefits provided by anchorage devices and with conservative values for reinforcement efficiency. As noted above, the main problem of FRP masonry walls reinforcement is failure mode. Recently, some authors have performed studies with different anchorage systems, finding that these systems are able to delay or prevent debonding . Studies include the following anchorage systems: Overlap, embedded bars, shear keys, shear restraint and fiber anchors. Chapter 4 briefly describes several experimental works between years 2000 and 2013, concerning different anchorage systems. The main parameters that measure the anchorage efficiency are: failure mode, failure load increase, displacements (in order to evaluate the ductility of the system); all these data points strongly depend on: reinforcement system, FRP fibers, anchorage system, and also on the specific anchorage parameters. Specific anchorage parameters are a function of the anchorage system used. The embedded bar system have design variables which can be identified as: bar diameter and material, surface finish, groove dimensions, and adhesive. In FRP anchorages (spikes) a complete design characterisation should include: type of fiber, manufacturing process, diameter, fan orientation, anchor splay width, anchor longitudinal spacing and number or rows, number or FRP sheet plies, bonded length beyond anchorage devices,...the parameters considered differ from some authors to others, so the comparison of results is quite complicated. Chapter 5 includes the most common tests used in experimental investigations on bond-behaviour and anchorage characterisation: direct shear tests (with variations single-shear and double-shear), pullout tests and bending tests. Each of them may be used according to the data needed. The purpose of this text is to promote further investigation of anchor spikes, accepting that both FRP anchors and embedded bars are the most versatile anchorage systems of FRP reinforcement and considering that to date its efficiency cannot be evaluated as there are too many design uncertainties.

Performance of masonry buildings during the 2011 Lorca earthquake

On Wednesday 11th May 2011 at 6:47 pm (local time) a magnitude 5.1 Mw earthquake occurred 6 km northeast of Lorca with a depth of around 2 km. As a consequence of the shallow depth and the small epicentral distance, important damage was produced in several masonry constructions and even led to the collapse of some of them. Pieces of the facades of several buildings fell down onto the sidewalk, being one of the reasons for the killing of a total of 9 people. The objective of this paper is to describe and analyze the failure patterns observed in unreinforced masonry buildings ranging from 3 to 8 floors in height. First, a brief description of the local building practices of masonry buildings is given. Then, the most important failure types of masonry buildings are described and discussed. After that, a more detailed analysis of one particular building is presented.

Experimental and numerical study of bond response in structural concrete with corroded steel bars

Corrosion can affect the bond between reinforcing bars and concrete and hence the transfer of longitudinal stresses. Although a number of experimental studies on bond failure have been conducted in recent years, the findings have diverged rather widely, due primarily to differing test conditions. The present paper reports on an experimental programme consisting of eccentric pull-out tests run on corroded steel bars in specimens subjected to accelerated or natural corrosion. An axisymmetric bi-dimensional FE model with finite deformations initially developed to study bond mechanics with sound steel bars, has been enhanced to consider bond effects in corroded steel bars. The model simulation is compared to some of the experimental results for corroded and sound bars and the findings are analysed.

Performance of buildings with masonry infill walls during the 2011 Lorca earthquake

On Wednesday 11th May 2011 at 6:47 pm (local time) a magnitude 5.1 Mw earthquake occurred 6 km northeast of Lorca with a depth of around 5 km. As a consequence of the shallow depth and the small epicentral distance, important damage was produced in several masonry constructions and even led to the collapse of one of them. Pieces of the facades of several buildings fell down onto the sidewalk, being one of the reasons for the killing of a total of 9 people. The objective of this paper is to describe and analyze the failure patterns observed in reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infill walls ranging from 3 to 8 floors in height. Structural as well as non-structural masonry walls suffered important damage that led to redistributions of forces causing in some cases the failure of columns. The importance of the interaction between the structural frames and the infill panels is analyzed by means of non-linear Finite Element Models. The resulting load levels are compared with the member capacities and the changes of the mechanical properties during the seismic event are described and discussed. In the light of the results obtained the observed failure patterns are explained. Some comments are stated concerning the adequacy of the numerical models that are usually used during the design phase for the seismic analysis.

Assessing construction and demolition waste on masonry works to avoid future generation

The difficulty of dealing with construction and demolition waste (CDW) on construction sites is not new and continues to be a significant environmental problem. Currently the CDW collection system in Spain is done in a decentralized manner by each sub-contracted company, being necessary to implement effective waste management measures ensuring a correct management and minimization. During the last years several measures have been launched in order to improve and encourage the reuse and recycling of CDW. A widespread solution for CDW recovery is using them as a landscaping aggregate or for road bases and sub-bases. However, measures encouraging onsite prevention still need to be enhanced. This paper studies the major work stage generating CDW and analyses the categories of CDW produced during its execution. For this, several real building sites have been analysed in order to quantify the estimation of CDW generated. Results of this study show that a significant contributor to the CDW generation on building construction sites in Spain are the masonry works. Finally, a Best Practices Manual (BPM) is proposed containing several strategies on masonry works aimed not only at CDW prevention, but also at improving their management and minimization. The use of this BPM together with the Study and Plan of CDW management --required by law--, promotes the environmental management of the company, favouring the cohesion of the construction process organization at all stages giving rise to establishing responsibilities in the field of waste and providing a greater control over the process. Keywords: construction and demolition waste, management, masonry works, good practice measures, prevention.

Hacia una taxonomía constructiva de las tapias de tierra y fábricas encofradas históricas = Towards a constructive taxonomy of the historical rammed-earth and formwork masonry

El objetivo fundamental de la investigación es el estudio de los fundamentos constructivos de las fábricas históricas de tapia de tierra y mampostería encofrada de las fortificaciones bajomedievales. Ante las incertidumbres detectadas en la datación de estas estructuras y frente al excesivo número de excepciones que quedan fuera de las clasificaciones tradicionalmente empleadas para estudiar este tipo de técnicas, el artículo desarrolla una propuesta de tipología o taxonomía constructiva basada en un sistema abierto. Este sistema nace del análisis de un número significativo de fábricas y atiende a diversos parámetros de control para la completa caracterización de cada fábrica: material, grado de compactación, función constructiva, encofrado, acabado superficial, combinación de materiales y situación, profundidad, formación y sección de los agujales. Cada fábrica se clasifica mediante una etiqueta alfanumérica. El sistema permite establecer tipos constructivos con los que se genera una clasificación cronotipológica constructiva. ABSTRACT The principal aim of the research is the study of the constructive reasons of the historical masonries built with rammed earth and formwork masonry, belonging to late medieval fortifications. Uncertainties have been warned about dating the historical masonries and there are excessive exceptions that do not fall in the rankings traditionally employed to study these techniques. Due to these reasons, the article develops a proposal of constructive typology or taxonomy based in an open system that comes from the analysis of a representative number of masonries and that attends to several control parameters tor the complete characterization of each masonry: material, compaction degree, constructive function, formwork, rendering, combination of materials and, last, the situation, deepness, formation and section of the putlogholes. Each masonry is classified through an alphanumeric label. The system allows establishing several constructive types which it is possible to do a cronotypological and constructive classification.