638 resultados para Illinois and Michigan Canal.


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

An appendix, including the minutes and proceedings of the society from its organization in 1865 through the 5th session, 1869, is inserted at the end of the 12th transaction, 1876.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

NUC pre-1956

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Beginning with report for 18 includes the reports of leased and purchased companies, e.g.: Dayton and Michigan, Cincinnati, Richmond and Chicago and Cincinnati, Hamilton and Indianapolis railroad companies.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Includes reviews of dissertations.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Issued also in Michigan. Legislature. Joint documents, 1841-97 and Michigan. Legislature. Documents.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Index of contents of Michigan Pomological Society reports 1872-1879 and Michigan Horticultural Society reports 1880-1907."

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

According to Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act (i.e. a generic name that refers to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, the Clean Water Act of 1977, and subsequent amendments) and guidance provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), each state must prepare and submit annually to the U.S. Congress and the USEPA report that describes the resource quality of the surface waters of the state. Every other year, this report, commonly referred to as the "305(b) report," must be provided in written form, whereas in alternate years each state may submit an electronic database to meet the reporting requirement. In the 305(b) report, states must also explain how they determined the resource quality of the waters of the state in terms of the degree to which predefined beneficial uses of those waters are supported. Also, in the 305(b) report when any designated use for any water body is not fully supported, the state must report potential reasons for the impairment. Herein, is explained how the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency determines the resource quality of Illinois streams, inland lakes, and Lake Michigan.