2 resultados para evaluative thinking
em Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (24)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (20)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (13)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (44)
- Brock University, Canada (11)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (50)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (3)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (10)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (27)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Deposito de Dissertacoes e Teses Digitais - Portugal (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (17)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Harvard University (2)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (21)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (53)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (30)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (5)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (5)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (11)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (47)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (24)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (14)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RIBERDIS - Repositorio IBERoamericano sobre DIScapacidad - Centro Español de Documentación sobre Discapacidad (CEDD) (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (50)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (19)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade do Minho (32)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (10)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (59)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (29)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (78)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (11)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Proportion responding (PR) is the preference for proportionally higher gains, such that the same absolute quantity is valued more as the reference group decreases. This research investigated this kind of proportion PR in decisions about saving lives (e.g., saving 10/10 lives is preferred to saving 10/100 lives). The results of two studies suggest that PR does not stem from an overall tendency to choose higher proportions, but rather from faulty deliberative reasoning. In particular, people who display PR are less likely to engage in deliberative reflection as measured by response time, the Process Dissociation Procedure, the Cognitive Reflection Test, a numeracy test, and a task assessing denominator neglect. This association between faulty deliberation and PR was observed only when choosing the highest proportion was non-normative because it came at the expense of absolute gains (e.g., saving 10/10 lives is preferred to saving 11/100 lives). These results help to make sense of discrepant findings in previous research, pertaining to how PR relates to biased reasoning and decision making.
Resumo:
Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada ao ISPA - Instituto Universitário