Relationship between estimation and real motor performance in school-age children

The relationship between estimated and real motor competences was analyzed for several tasks. Participants were 303 children (160 boys and 143 girls), which had between 6 and 10 years of age (M=8.63, SD=1.16). None of the children presented developmental difficulties or learning disabilities, and all attended age-appropriate classes. Children were divided into three groups according to their age: group 1 (N= 102; age range: 6.48-8.01 years); group 2 (N= 101; age range: 8.02-9.22 years); and group 3 (N=100; age range: 9.24-10.93 years). Children were asked to predict their maximum distance for a locomotor, a manipulative, and a balance task, prior to performing those tasks. Children’s estimations were compared with their real performance to determine their accuracy. Children had, in general, a tendency to overestimate their performance (standing long jump: 56.11%, kicking: 63.37%, throwing: 73.60%, and Walking Backwards (WB) on a balance beam: 45.21%), and older children tended to be more accurate, except for the manipulative tasks. Furthermore, the relationship between estimation and real performance in children with different levels of motor coordination (Köperkoordinationstest für Kinder, KTK) was analyzed. The 75 children with the highest score comprised the Highest Motor Coordination (HMC) group, and the 78 children with the lowest score were placed in the Lowest Motor Coordination (LMC) group. There was a tendency for LMC and HMC children to overestimate their skills at all tasks, except for the HMC group at the WB task. Children with the HMC level tended to be more accurate when predicting their motor performance; however, differences in absolute percent error were only significant for the throwing and WB tasks. In conclusion, children display a tendency to overestimate their performance independently of their motor coordination level and task. This fact may be determinant to the development of their motor competences, since they are more likely to engage and persist in motor tasks, but it might also increase the occurrence of unintended injuries.

Diâmetro pupilar e fadiga mental em tarefas de controle de tráfego aéreo

Researches point out that the pupil diameter is a sign for fatigue calibration. In this study, we try to analyze how, through a more complex task of air traffic control, the participants will show a bigger pupil diameter than in tasks of easier air traffic control. Likewise, as the theories that go in line with compensatory mechanisms assume, if the job/task requires it, new resources may be provided to continue its execution. The sample had 61 participants, and two variables were manipulated: traffic density on condition many aircrafts and few aircrafts. And the other variable was the time on the task with 5 minute intervals for 2 hours (23 intervals). The dependent variable was the pupil diameter. The results showed that participants who performed the most complex task had bigger pupil diameter. At the same time, they showed that more activity of the participant, major would be the diameter pupilar. Also, the variable TOT (Time Of Task) showed that the pupil diminished, and then it continued increasing due to a generation of new resources.