Jurors' responses to expert witness testimony: The effects of gender stereotypes


Autoria(s): McKimmie, Blake M.; Newton, Cameron J.; Terry, Deborah J.; Schuller, Regina A.
Contribuinte(s)

D. Abrams

M. Hogg

Data(s)

01/01/2004

Resumo

The present study investigated whether the impact of expert testimony was influenced by the congruency between the gender of the expert and the gender orientation of the case. Participants (N = 62) read a trial transcript involving a price-fixing allegation in either a male or female oriented domain. Within the case, the gender of the expert was manipulated. As predicted, the impact of the expert (e.g. damage awards) was greater when the gender of the expert and domain of the case were congruent as opposed to incongruent. Results also indicated that the impact of gender-domain congruency was particularly pronounced following group discussion. In addition, there was evidence that this effect was mediated through participants' evaluations of the expert witness.

Identificador

http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:72778

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Sage Publications

Palavras-Chave #Psychology, Social #expert witnesses #juror decision-making #stereotypes #Jury Deliberations #Source Credibility #Social-perception #Persuasion #Information #Involvement #Determinant #Attitudes #Decisions #Knowledge #C1 #380105 Social and Community Psychology #780108 Behavioural and cognitive sciences
Tipo

Journal Article