Risk, ambiguity, and diversification


Autoria(s): Sautua, Santiago-Ignacio
Data(s)

11/03/2016

Resumo

Attitudes toward risk influence the decision to diversify among uncertain options. Yet, because in most situations the options are ambiguous, attitudes toward ambiguity may also play an important role. I conduct a laboratory experiment to investigate the effect of ambiguity on the decision to diversify. I find that diversification is more prevalent and more persistent under ambiguity than under risk. Moreover, excess diversification under ambiguity is driven by participants who stick with a status quo gamble when diversification among gambles is not feasible. This behavioral pattern cannot be accommodated by major theories of choice under ambiguity.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/12039

Publicador

Facultad de Economía

Relação

https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000092/014588.html

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR

instname:Universidad del Rosario

Anscombe, Francis J., and Robert J. Aumann. 1963. ìA DeÖnition of Subjective Probability.îAnnals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1): 199-205.

Bell, David. 1982. ìRegret in Decision Making under Uncertainty.îOperations Research, 30(5): 961-981.

Bell, David. 1985. ìDisappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty.î Operations Research, 33(1): 1-27.

Benartzi, Shlomo, and Richard Thaler. 2001. ìNaive DiversiÖcation Strategies in DeÖned Contribution Saving Plans.îAmerican Economic Review, 91(1): 79-98.

Bewley, Truman F. 2002. ìKnightian Decision Theory: Part I.îDecisions in Economics and Finance, 25(2): 79-110.

Bossaerts, Peter, Paolo Ghirardato, Serena Guarneschelli, and William Zame. 2010. ìAmbiguity in Asset Markets: Theory and Experiment.îThe Review of Financial Studies, 23(4): 1325-1359.

Brunnermeier, Markus K., Christian Gollier, and Jonathan A. Parker. 2007. ìOptimal Beliefs, Asset Prices, and the Preference for Skewed Returns.îAmerican Economic Review, 97(2): 159-165.

Bryan, Gharad. 2013. ìAmbiguity Aversion Decreases Demand for Partial Insurance: Evidence from African Farmers.î Available at https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7911910/AmbiguityAndInsurance.pdf.

Charness, Gary, and Dan Levin. 2005. ìWhen Optimal Choices Feel Wrong: A Laboratory Study of Bayesian Updating, Complexity, and A§ect.îAmerican Economic Review, 95(4): 1300-1309.

Choi, Syngjoo, Raymond Fisman, Douglas Gale, and Shachar Kariv. 2007. ìConsistency and Heterogeneity of Individual Behavior under Uncertainty.î American Economic Review, 97(5): 1921-1938.

Dean, Mark. 2008. ìStatus Quo Bias in Large and Small Choice Sets.îAvailable at http://www.columbia.edu/~md3405/Working_Paper_4.pdf.

Ellsberg, Daniel. 1961. ìRisk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.îQuarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4): 643-669.

Ghirardato, Paolo, Fabio Maccheroni, and Massimo Marinacci. 2004. ìDi§erentiating Ambiguity and Ambiguity Attitude.îJournal of Economic Theory, 118(2): 133-173.

Gilboa, Itzhak, and David Schmeidler. 1989. ìMaxmin Expected Utility with a Non-Unique Prior.îJournal of Mathematical Economics, 18: 141-153.

John, Oliver P., Eileen M. Donahue, and Robert L. Kentle. 1991. ìThe Big Five Inventoryó Versions 4a and 54.îBerkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.

Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. ìProspect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.îEconometrica, 47(2): 263-292.

Klibano§, Peter, Massimo Marinacci, and Sujoy Mukerji. 2005. ìA Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity.î Econometrica, 73(6): 1849- 1892.

Klibano§, Peter, Massimo Marinacci, and Sujoy Mukerji. 2012. ìOn the Smooth Ambiguity Model: A Reply.îEconometrica, 80(3): 1303-1321.

Knight, Frank. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty, and ProÖt. Boston: Houghton Mi­ in.

Koszegi, Botond, and Matthew Rabin. 2006. ìA Model of ReferenceDependent Preferences.îQuarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4): 1133-1165.

Koszegi, Botond, and Matthew Rabin. 2007. ìReference-Dependent Risk Attitudes.îAmerican Economic Review, 97(4): 1047-1073.

Kr‰hmer, Daniel, and Rebecca Stone. 2013. ìAnticipated Regret as an Explanation of Uncertainty Aversion.îEconomic Theory, 52: 709-728.

Langer, Ellen J. 1975. ìThe Illusion of Control.î Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2): 311-328.

Loomes, Graham. 1991. ìEvidence of a New Violation of the Independence Axiom.îJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4(1): 91-108.

Loomes, Graham, and Robert Sugden. 1982. ìRegret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty.îThe Economic Journal, 92(368): 805-824.

Loomes, Graham, and Robert Sugden. 1986. ìDisappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty.îThe Review of Economic Studies, 53(2): 271-282.

Machina, Mark. 2014. ìAmbiguity Aversion with Three or More Outcomes.î American Economic Review, 104(12): 3814-3840.

Machina, Mark, and Marciano Siniscalchi. 2014. ìAmbiguity and Ambiguity Aversion.îIn Handbook of the Economics of Uncertainty, Vol. 1, edited by Mark J. Machina and W. Kip Viscusi, 729-807. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V.

Maccheroni, Fabio, Massimo Marinacci, and Aldo Rustichini. 2006. ìAmbiguity Aversion, Robustness, and the Variational Representation of Preferences.îEconometrica, 74(6): 1447-1498.

Mitton, Todd, and Keith Vorkink. 2007. ìEquilibrium UnderdiversiÖcation and the Preference for Skewness.îReview of Financial Studies, 20(4): 1255-1288.

Rabin, Matthew. 2000. ìRisk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem.îEconometrica, 68(5): 1281-1292.

Roca, MercË, Robin Hogarth, and John Maule. 2006. ìAmbiguity Seeking as a Result of the Status Quo Bias.îJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32: 175-194.

Samuelson, William, and Richard Zeckhauser. 1988. ìStatus Quo Bias in Decision Making.îJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1: 7-59.

Sautua, Santiago. 2016. ìDoes Uncertainty Cause Inertia in Decision Making? An Experimental Study of the Role of Regret Aversion and Indecisiveness.îAvailable at https://sites.google.com/site/santiagoisautua/research

Savage, Leonard J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Schmeidler, David. 1989. ìSubjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity.îEconometrica, 57(3): 571-587.

Sugden, Robert. 2003. ìReference-Dependent Subjective Expected Utility.î Journal of Economic Theory, 111: 172-191.

Thaler, Richard, and Cass Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin Books.

Palavras-Chave #Economía #Inercia -- Aspectos económicos #Diversificación -- Aspectos económicos #330 #risk, ambiguity #inertia #diversification #reference-dependent preferences #indecisiveness #ambiguity aversion
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion