Effect of PaCO(2) variation on standard base excess value in critically ill patients
| Contribuinte(s) |
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO |
|---|---|
| Data(s) |
19/10/2012
19/10/2012
2009
|
| Resumo |
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of acute PaCO(2) temporal variation on the standard base excess (SBE) value in critically ill patients. Methods: A total of 265 patients were prospectively observed; 158 were allocated to the modeling group, and 107 were allocated to the validation group. Two models were developed in the modeling group (one including and one excluding PaCO(2) as a variable determinant of SBE), and both were tested in the validation group. Results: In the modeling group, the mathematical model including SIDai, SIG, L-lactate, albumin, phosphate, and PaCO(2) had a predictive superiority in comparison with the model without PaCO(2) (R(2) = 0.978 and 0.916, respectively). In the validation group, the results were confirmed with significant F change statistics (R(2) change = 0.059, P < .001) between the model with and without PaCO(2). A high correlation (R = 0.99, P < .001) and agreement (bias = -0.25 mEq/L, limits of agreement 95% = -0.72 to 0.22 mEq/L) were found between the model-predicted SBE value and the SBE calculated using the Van Slyke equation. Conclusions: Acute PaCO(2), temporal variation is related to SBE changes in critically ill patients. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Identificador |
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, v.24, n.4, p.484-491, 2009 0883-9441 http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/23179 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.12.018 |
| Idioma(s) |
eng |
| Publicador |
W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC |
| Relação |
Journal of Critical Care |
| Direitos |
restrictedAccess Copyright W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC |
| Palavras-Chave | #Acidosis #Base excess #Outcomes #Critical care #Strong ion gap #POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE #METABOLIC-ACIDOSIS #PROSPECTIVE TRIAL #PULMONARY-EDEMA #BLOOD #ENDOTOXEMIA #REGRESSION #EQUATION #BILEVEL #SEPSIS #Critical Care Medicine |
| Tipo |
article original article publishedVersion |