Leaf area index estimation with MODIS reflectance time series and model inversion during full rotations of Eucalyptus plantations


Autoria(s): MAIRE, Guerric le; MARSDEN, Claire; VERHOEF, Wouter; PONZONI, Flavio Jorge; SEEN, Danny Lo; BEGUE, Agnes; STAPE, Jose-Luiz; NOUVELLON, Yann
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

18/10/2012

18/10/2012

2011

Resumo

The leaf area index (LAI) of fast-growing Eucalyptus plantations is highly dynamic both seasonally and interannually, and is spatially variable depending on pedo-climatic conditions. LAI is very important in determining the carbon and water balance of a stand, but is difficult to measure during a complete stand rotation and at large scales. Remote-sensing methods allowing the retrieval of LAI time series with accuracy and precision are therefore necessary. Here, we tested two methods for LAI estimation from MODIS 250m resolution red and near-infrared (NIR) reflectance time series. The first method involved the inversion of a coupled model of leaf reflectance and transmittance (PROSPECT4), soil reflectance (SOILSPECT) and canopy radiative transfer (4SAIL2). Model parameters other than the LAI were either fixed to measured constant values, or allowed to vary seasonally and/or with stand age according to trends observed in field measurements. The LAI was assumed to vary throughout the rotation following a series of alternately increasing and decreasing sigmoid curves. The parameters of each sigmoid curve that allowed the best fit of simulated canopy reflectance to MODIS red and NIR reflectance data were obtained by minimization techniques. The second method was based on a linear relationship between the LAI and values of the GEneralized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (GESAVI), which was calibrated using destructive LAI measurements made at two seasons, on Eucalyptus stands of different ages and productivity levels. The ability of each approach to reproduce field-measured LAI values was assessed, and uncertainty on results and parameter sensitivities were examined. Both methods offered a good fit between measured and estimated LAI (R(2) = 0.80 and R(2) = 0.62 for model inversion and GESAVI-based methods, respectively), but the GESAVI-based method overestimated the LAI at young ages. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

European Integrated Project Ultra Low CO2 Steelmaking (ULCOS)[515960]

CNPq306561/2007

EucFlux project

French Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Identificador

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, v.115, n.2, p.586-599, 2011

0034-4257

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/19331

10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.004

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.004

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC

Relação

Remote Sensing of Environment

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC

Palavras-Chave #Leaf area index #Remote sensing #MOD13Q1 #Radiative transfer model #PROSAIL #GESAVI #Eucalypt #CBERS #OPTICAL-PROPERTIES #VEGETATION INDEX #BIDIRECTIONAL REFLECTANCE #USE EFFICIENCY #CANOPY #IMAGERY #FOREST #CHLOROPHYLL #RESOLUTION #GLOBULUS #Environmental Sciences #Remote Sensing #Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion