Available Phosphorus Evaluated by Three Soil Tests in a Brazilian Tropical Oxisol Treated With Gypsum
Contribuinte(s) |
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO |
---|---|
Data(s) |
18/10/2012
18/10/2012
2010
|
Resumo |
Mehlich-1, resin-HCO(3), and Pi tests were used to assess available P in an acid tropical Oxisol in Brazil treated with gypsum, which has been preferred over lime to ameliorate the Al toxicity in the subsoil. The soil was incubated in the laboratory at rates up to 75 g kg(-1) of phosphogypsum (PG) containing 0.3% total P, natural gypsum, or reagent-grade gypsum, and up to 100 mg P kg(-1) as triple superphosphate (TSP) or phosphate rock (PR). In the greenhouse, two consecutive maize crops were grown on the soil treated with 50 mg P kg(-1) of TSP and PG rates up to 75 g kg(-1). The results of the incubation study showed that Mehlich-P and Pi-P increased with increasing PG rate for the treatments of TSP, PR, and control. Resin-HCO(3) underestimated available P from TSP and PR because of the reaction between resin-HCO(3) and gypsum. Mehlich-1 overestimated available P from PR compared with TSP because of an excessive dissolution of PR by the strongly acidic Mehlich-1. Pi underestimated available P from PR in the treatments of natural and reagent-grade gypsum because of Ca common-ion effect from gypsum on depressing PR dissolution. The results in terms of the effect of PG on available P are similar in both incubation and greenhouse studies. Both Mehlich-P and Pi-P correlated well with P uptake by maize, whereas resin-P did not. FAPESP (Foundation for Supporting Research in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil) |
Identificador |
SOIL SCIENCE, v.175, n.5, p.233-239, 2010 0038-075X http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/19239 10.1097/SS.0b013e3181e04a45 |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS |
Relação |
Soil Science |
Direitos |
closedAccess Copyright LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS |
Palavras-Chave | #Oxisol #gypsum #Olsen-P #resin-P #Pi-P #CALCAREOUS SOILS #RECLAMATION #PAPER #Soil Science |
Tipo |
article original article publishedVersion |