DOES THE CHRONOTYPE CLASSIFICATION NEED TO BE UPDATED? PRELIMINARY FINDINGS


Autoria(s): MARTYNHAK, Bruno Jacson; LOUZADA, Fernando Mazzilli; PEDRAZZOLI, Mario; ARAUJO, John Fontenele
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

18/10/2012

18/10/2012

2010

Resumo

Traditionally, chronotype classification is based on the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). It is implicit in the classification that intermediate individuals get intermediate scores to most of the MEQ questions. However, a small group of individuals has a different pattern of answers. In some questions, they answer as ""morning-types"" and in some others they answer as ""evening-types,"" resulting in an intermediate total score. ""Evening-type"" and ""Morning-type"" answers were set as A(1) and A(4), respectively. Intermediate answers were set as A(2) and A(3). The following algorithm was applied: Bimodality Index = (Sigma A(1) x Sigma A(4))(2) - (Sigma A(2) x Sigma A(3))(2). Neither-types that had positive bimodality scores were classified as bimodal. If our hypothesis is validated by objective data, an update of chronotype classification will be required. (Author correspondence: brunojm@ymail.com)

Identificador

CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, v.27, n.6, p.1329-1334, 2010

0742-0528

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/17145

10.3109/07420528.2010.490314

http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2010.490314

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

INFORMA HEALTHCARE

Relação

Chronobiology International

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright INFORMA HEALTHCARE

Palavras-Chave #Bimodal #Chronotype #Morning and evening oscillators #MORNINGNESS-EVENINGNESS #ADOLESCENTS #PREFERENCE #DROSOPHILA #GENDER #SLEEP #TIME #OSCILLATOR #PACEMAKERS #SEASONS #Biology #Physiology
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion