Conflict and Consensus


Autoria(s): Hayward, Katy
Data(s)

2015

Resumo

There are widely differing conceptions as to whether healthy social relations are, in essence, conflictual or consensual; such differences give rise to different approaches to finding peace and managing power. This article outlines the two broad schools of thought from conflict theory (in which society functions through competition) and consensus theory (which sees society developing through cooperation). It outlines the middle ground between them, as found by pluralism and agonism, before considering the ways in which assumptions vis-a-vis conflict and consensus are reflected in different models of democratic system and, in particular, different priorities for post-conflict recovery.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/conflict-and-consensus(da0d6e50-4fc6-4726-b2c9-cd7fcb250ae0).html

http://pure.qub.ac.uk/ws/files/14746039/Conflict_and_Consensus_published.pdf

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Elsevier

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Fonte

Hayward , K 2015 , Conflict and Consensus . in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences . 2 edn , vol. 4 , Elsevier , Oxford , pp. 589-593 .

Palavras-Chave #Centripetalism #Compromise #Functionalism #Pluralism #Power-sharing #Agonism #Interdependence #/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300 #Social Sciences(all)
Tipo

contributionToPeriodical