Added value of diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of cervical cancer recurrence compared with morphologic and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI sequences

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting post-treatment cervical cancer recurrence. The detection accuracy of T2-weighted (T2W) images was compared with that of T2W MRI combined with either dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI or DWI. METHODS Thirty-eight women with clinically suspected uterine cervical cancer recurrence more than six months after treatment completion were examined with 1.5 Tesla MRI including T2W, DCE, and DWI sequences. Disease was confirmed histologically and correlated with MRI findings. The diagnostic performance of T2W imaging and its combination with either DCE or DWI were analyzed. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and accuracy were calculated. RESULTS Thirty-six women had histologically proven recurrence. The accuracy for recurrence detection was 80% with T2W/DCE MRI and 92.1% with T2W/DWI. The addition of DCE sequences did not significantly improve the diagnostic ability of T2W imaging, and this sequence combination misclassified two patients as falsely positive and seven as falsely negative. The T2W/DWI combination revealed a positive predictive value of 100% and only three false negatives. CONCLUSION The addition of DWI to T2W sequences considerably improved the diagnostic ability of MRI. Our results support the inclusion of DWI in the initial MRI protocol for the detection of cervical cancer recurrence, leaving DCE sequences as an option for uncertain cases.

The shading sign: is it exclusive of endometriomas?

Objectives: To investigate if the shading sign is an exclusive MRI feature of endometriomas or endometrioid tumors, and to analyze its different patterns. Methods: Three hundred and fourty six women with adnexal masses who underwent 1.5/3-T MRI were included in this retrospective, board-approved study. The shading sign was found in 56 patients, but five cases were excluded due to lack of imaging follow-up or histological correlation. The final sample included 51 women. The type of tumor and the pattern of shading were recorded for each case. Results: Thirty endometriomas and five endometrioid carcinomas were found. The remaining 16 cases corresponded to other benign and malignant tumors. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 73%, 93%, 59%, and 96%, respectively. Restricting the analysis to cystic lesions without solid or fat component, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 73%, 96%, 94%, and 80%. Five shading patterns were identified: layering (15.7%), liquid–liquid level (11.8%), homogenous (45.1%), heterogeneous (11.8%), and focal/multifocal shading within a complex mass (19.6%). No significant correlation was found between these patterns and the type of tumor. Conclusions: The shading sign is not exclusive of endometriomas or endometrioid tumors. Homogenous shading was the most prevalent pattern in endometriomas and half of the cases with focal/multifocal shading within a complex mass were endometrioid carcinomas.

Estadiamento do carcinoma do colo do útero por ressonância magnética – comparação com os achados anátomo-patológicos

Objectivo: Avaliar a acuidade da Ressonância Magnética (RM) no estadiamento do carcinoma do colo do útero, comparando os achados em RM com os resultados Anátomo-Patológicos da peça operatória. Material e Métodos: Foi efectuado um estudo retrospectivo que incluiu 41 doentes operadas com o diagnóstico de carcinoma do colo do útero e previamente submetidas a RM para estadiamento, entre Janeiro de 2007 e Dezembro de 2009. Foram analisados os seguintes factores de estadiamento e prognóstico: dimensão do tumor, invasão dos paramétrios, invasão da vagina e metástases ganglionares. A dimensão do tumor determinada por RM foi comparada com a medição na peça operatória através da análise do declive e ordenada na origem de uma recta de regressão entre os dois métodos. Resultados: O tumor foi visualizado por RM na maioria dos casos (35 doentes, 85.4%). Nas restantes 6 doentes a avaliação anátomo-patológica revelou um tumor com menos de 6 mm de diâmetro. A dimensão do tumor foi adequadamente avaliada por RM, sem diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre a medição por RM e na peça operatória. Foi confirmado o elevado valor preditivo negativo da RM na exclusão de invasão dos paramétrios previamente reportado, com apenas 2 falsos negativos em que a anatomia patológica demonstrou apenas invasão microscópica focal. A invasão da vagina foi correctamente avaliada em 30 doentes (85.7%), tendo-se verificado nos restantes casos 2 falsos negativos e 3 falsos positivos. Em relação às metástases ganglionares verificaram-se 4 falsos negativos, no total das 41 doentes avaliadas. Conclusão: A dimensão do tumor, invasão dos paramétrios, invasão da vagina e metástases ganglionares foram adequadamente avaliadas por RM, confirmando a capacidade da RM no estadiamento do carcinoma do colo do útero.