Thirteen years of surgical site infection surveillance in Swiss hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance is an essential element of surgical site infection (SSI) prevention. Few studies have evaluated the long-term effect of these programmes. AIM: To present data from a 13-year multicentre SSI surveillance programme from western and southern Switzerland. METHODS: Surveillance with post-discharge follow-up was performed according to the US National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system methods. SSI rates were calculated for each surveyed type of surgery, overall and by year of participation in the programme. Risk factors for SSI and the effect of surveillance time on SSI rates were analysed by multiple logistic regression. FINDINGS: Overall SSI rates were 18.2% after 7411 colectomies, 6.4% after 6383 appendicectomies, 2.3% after 7411 cholecystectomies, 1.7% after 9933 herniorrhaphies, 1.6% after 6341 hip arthroplasties, and 1.3% after 3667 knee arthroplasties. The frequency of SSI detected after discharge varied between 21% for colectomy and 94% for knee arthroplasty. Independent risk factors for SSI differed between operations. The NNIS risk index was predictive of SSI in gastrointestinal surgery only. Laparoscopic technique was protective overall, but associated with higher rates of organ-space infections after appendicectomy. The duration of participation in the surveillance programme was not associated with a decreased SSI rate for any of the included procedure. CONCLUSION: These data confirm the effect of post-discharge surveillance on SSI rates and the protective effect of laparoscopy. There is a need to establish alternative case-mix adjustment methods. In contrast to other European programmes, no positive impact of surveillance duration on SSI rates was observed.

Surgical site infection and its risk factors in colon surgeries

Abstract OBJECTIVE To identify the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) and its risk factors in patients undergoing colon surgery in a tertiary hospital located in the countryside of the state of São Paulo. METHOD Retrospective cohort study, with collection of information contained in the medical records of patients undergoing colon surgery in the period between January 2010 and December 2013. The studied variables were the possible risk factors related to the patient, to demographic characteristics and the surgical procedure. RESULTS In total, were evaluated 155 patients with an overall SSI incidence of 16.7%. A statistically significant association was found both in the univariate as in the multivariate analysis between the SSI and the following variables: male gender, Charlson index and mechanical bowel preparation. CONCLUSION The understanding of health professionals about the factors that influence the incidence of SSI in colon surgery may contribute to the quality of care provided to surgical patients, from effective actions to minimize the risk of infections.

Thirteen years of surgical site infection surveillance in Swiss hospitals

Contexte : Les infections du site opératoire (Surgical Site Infections - SSI) sont des complications fréquentes des procédures chirurgicales et un problème majeur de la santé publique. La surveillance constitue un élément essentiel de la prévention des SSI. Les résultats publiés récemment par certains pays européens suggèrent un impact positif qu'un réseau de surveillance active peut avoir sur le taux de SSI dans les hôpitaux participants. Objectif : La présente étude évalue les effets de la surveillance sur l'incidence des SSI en analysant les résultats du programme suisse multicentrique de surveillance des SSI. Méthodes : L'étude porte sur les 13 premières années du programme, regroupant au total 23 hôpitaux périphériques, cantonaux et universitaires de la Suisse occidentale et du sud. Ce programme, qui a intégré le consortium national Swissnoso en 2011, a été organisé conformément aux principes du système américain de National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS). La surveillance incluait les procédures de la chirurgie viscérale (appendicectomie, cholécystectomie, chirurgie du colon et herniaire) et de l'orthopédie (arthroplastie de la hanche et du genou). Les données démographiques et cliniques étaient recueillies de manière standardisée par les infirmières cliniciennes en infectiologie pendant et après l'hospitalisation. Les rapports annuels, résumant les taux des SSI pour chaque type de procédure ainsi que la comparaison inter-hospitalière des risques relatifs ajustés à l'index NNIS, ont été discutés au sein de chaque établissement entre le comité des chirurgiens et le responsable local du programme. Analyses statistiques : Les taux cumulatifs des SSI ont été calculés pour chaque procédure chirurgicale. Une stratification selon le type de SSI (superficielle, profonde, organe/espace) et selon l'index NNIS a été respectée. Les facteurs de risque des SSI ont été identifiés pour chaque procédure par les analyses univariées des caractéristiques du patient (âge, sexe, score ASA, temps avant l'opération) et celles de l'opération (classe de contamination, durée de la chirurgie, urgence, antibioprophylaxie, laparoscopie, procédures multiples, ré¬intervention). Afin d'évaluer l'effet de la durée de la surveillance sur le taux des SSI, le temps de participation au programme a été calculé et stratifié par périodes d'un an par hôpital et par procédure. La corrélation entre la durée de la surveillance et les SSI a été estimée en utilisant les modèles de régression logistique pour chaque procédure avec l'ajustement pour les variables avec p ^ 0.2. Dans toutes les analyses, la valeur p < 0.05 était considéré significative. Résultats : Les taux globaux des SSI étaient : 18.2% pour les colectomies, 6.4% pour les appendicectomies, 2.3% pour les cholécystectomies, 1.7% pour les cures des hernies et 1.6% et 1.3% pour les arthroplasties de la hanche et du genou, respectivement. L'incidence des SSI post-hospitalières allait du 21% pour les colectomies au 94% pour les arthroplasties du genou. Concernant les facteurs prédictifs des SSI, l'index NNIS était valable seulement pour la chirurgie gastro-intestinale, la laparoscopie étant globalement protectrice mais associée à un taux d'infections profondes plus élevé après l'appendicectomie. La durée de la participation au programme de surveillance n'apportait pas de diminution des taux des SSI dans aucune procédure incluse dans l'étude. Conclusions : L'étude confirme l'impact de la surveillance post-hospitalière sur le taux des SSI, l'effet protectrice de la laparoscopie ainsi que l'absence de la valeur prédictive de l'index NNIS en orthopédie. Contrairement aux autres programmes européens nous n'avons pas détecté d'effet positif de la durée de la surveillance sur le taux des SSI. Les résultats obtenus ouvrent la discussion sur l'utilisation plus effective des données de surveillance des SSI.

Surgical Site Infection in a University Hospital in Northeast Brazil

We examined prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) in a tertiary teaching hospital in northeast Brazil, from January 1994 to December 2003. The survey included 5,742 patients subjected to thoracic, urologic, vascular and general surgery. The criteria for diagnosing SSI were those of the Centers for Disease Control, USA, and the variables of the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk index were used. Data analysis revealed that anesthetic risk scores, wound class and duration of surgery were significantly associated with SSI. A total of 296 SSIs were detected among the 5,742 patients (5.1%). The overall incidence of SSI was 8.8% in 1994; it decreased to 3.3% in 2003. In conclusion, the use of educational strategies, based on guidelines for SSI prevention reduced SSI incidence. Appropriate management of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative incision care, and a surveillance system based on international criteria, were useful in reducing SSI rates in our hospital

Operation time and body mass index are significant risk factors for surgical site infection in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: a multicenter study

Surgical site infection (SSI) in patients who underwent colorectal surgery is a common complication associated with increased morbidity and costs. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for SSI in laparoscopic sigmoid resection for benign disease.

Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the noise level in an operating theatre as a possible surrogate marker for intraoperative behaviour, and to detect any correlation between sound level and subsequent surgical-site infection (SSI).

Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection

HYPOTHESIS: Clinically apparent surgical glove perforation increases the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: University Hospital Basel, with an average of 28,000 surgical interventions per year. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive series of 4147 surgical procedures performed in the Visceral Surgery, Vascular Surgery, and Traumatology divisions of the Department of General Surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome of interest was SSI occurrence as assessed pursuant to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention standards. The primary predictor variable was compromised asepsis due to glove perforation. RESULTS: The overall SSI rate was 4.5% (188 of 4147 procedures). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed a higher likelihood of SSI in procedures in which gloves were perforated compared with interventions with maintained asepsis (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.8; P < .001). However, multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the increase in SSI risk with perforated gloves was different for procedures with vs those without surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (test for effect modification, P = .005). Without antimicrobial prophylaxis, glove perforation entailed significantly higher odds of SSI compared with the reference group with no breach of asepsis (adjusted OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.7-10.8; P = .003). On the contrary, when surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was applied, the likelihood of SSI was not significantly higher for operations in which gloves were punctured (adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.9; P = .26). CONCLUSION: Without surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, glove perforation increases the risk of SSI.

The association of preoperative anemia and perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion with the risk of surgical site infection

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to investigate allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) and preoperative anemia as risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort of 5873 consecutive general surgical procedures at Basel University Hospital was analyzed to determine the relationship between perioperative ABT and preoperative anemia and the incidence of SSI. ABT was defined as transfusion of leukoreduced red blood cells during surgery and anemia as hemoglobin concentration of less than 120 g/L before surgery. Surgical wounds and resulting infections were assessed to Centers for Disease Control standards. RESULTS: The overall SSI rate was 4.8% (284 of 5873). In univariable logistic regression analyses, perioperative ABT (crude odds ratio [OR], 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.0; p < 0.001) and preoperative anemia (crude OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.7; p = 0.037) were significantly associated with an increased odds of SSI. After adjusting for 13 characteristics of the patient and the procedure in multivariable analyses, associations were substantially reduced for ABT (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.9; p = 0.310; OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.6 to 2.0; p = 0.817 for 1-2 blood units and >or=3 blood units, respectively) and anemia (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.2; p = 0.530). Duration of surgery was the main confounding variable. CONCLUSION: Our findings point to important confounding factors and strengthen existing doubts on leukoreduced ABT during general surgery and preoperative anemia as risk factors for SSIs.

Impact of surgical training on incidence of surgical site infection

BACKGROUND: Despite availability of other training forms, tutorial assistance cannot be entirely replaced in surgical education. Concerns exist that tutorial assistance may lead to an increased rate of surgical site infection (SSI). The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the risk of SSI is higher after surgery with tutorial assistance than after surgery performed autonomously by a fully trained surgeon. METHODS: All consecutive visceral, vascular, and traumatological inpatient procedures at a Swiss University Hospital were prospectively recorded during a 24-month period, and the patients were followed for 12 months to ascertain the occurrence of SSI. Using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions, we assessed the association of tutorial assistance surgery with SSI in 6,103 interventions. RESULTS: Autonomously performed surgery was associated with SSI in univariable analysis (5.36% SSI vs. 3.81% for tutorial assistance, p = 0.006). In multivariable analysis, the odds of SSI for tutorial assistance was no longer significantly lower (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.82; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.62-1.09; p = 0.163). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical training does not lead to higher SSI rate if trainees are adequately supervised and interventions are carefully selected. Although other forms of training are useful, tutorial assistance in the operating room continues to be the mainstay of surgical education.

Hepatic steatosis is associated with surgical-site infection after hepatic and colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND Obesity and increased visceral fat deposits are important risk factors for surgical-site infection (SSI). Interestingly, a potential role of hepatic steatosis on complications after extrahepatic surgery remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of hepatic steatosis on SSI in patients that underwent open abdominal surgery. METHODS A total of 231 patients that underwent either liver (n = 116) or colorectal (n = 115) resection and received preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans were retrospectively investigated. Signal attenuation of the liver parenchyma was measured on computed tomography scans to assess hepatic steatosis. RESULTS More SSIs (including types 1, 2, and 3) were found in the group with hepatic steatosis (56/118 [47.5%]) compared with the control group (30/113 [26.6%]; P = .001). Patients with hepatic steatosis showed greater median body mass index than patients without hepatic steatosis (26.6 kg/m(2) [range 16.8-47.0 kg/m(2)] vs 23.2 kg/m(2) [15.9-32.7 kg/m(2)]; P < .001). Patients with hepatic steatosis experienced longer median operation times (297 minutes [52-708 minutes] vs 240 minutes [80-600 minutes]; P = .003). In a multivariate analysis, hepatic steatosis was identified as an independent risk factor for SSI in patients undergoing hepatic (odds ratio 10.33 [95% confidence interval 1.19-89.76]; P = .03) or colorectal (odds ratio 6.67 [95% confidence interval 1.12-39.33]; P = .04) operation. CONCLUSION Hepatic steatosis is associated with SSI after hepatic and colorectal operation.

Laparoscopic approach in perforated appendicitis: increased incidence of surgical site infection?

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopy in the setting of perforated appendicitis remains controversial. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the early postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) compared to open appendectomy (OA) in patients with perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A total of 1,032 patients required an appendectomy between January 2005 and December 2009. Among these patients, 169 presented with perforated appendicitis. Operation times, length of hospital stay, overall complication rates within 30 days, and surgical site infection (SSI) rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of the 169 evaluated patients, 106 required LA and 63 OA. Although operation times were similar in both groups (92 ± 31 min for LA vs. 98 ± 45 for OA, p = 0.338), length of hospital stay was shorter in the LA group (6.9 ± 3.8 days vs. 11.5 ± 9.2, p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were significantly lower in the LA group (32.1 vs. 52.4 %, p < 0.001), as were incisional SSI (1.9 vs. 22.2 %, p < 0.001). Organ/space SSI rates were similar in both groups (23.6 % after LA vs. 20.6 % after OA, p = 0.657). CONCLUSIONS: For perforated appendicitis, LA results in a significantly shorter hospital stay, fewer overall postoperative complications, and fewer wound infections compared to OA. Organ/space SSI rates were similar for both procedures. LA provides a safe option for treating patients with perforated appendicitis.