Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts

In this article, the concept of pluralism is used to expose variations in the relationship between organizing and strategizing and the consequences of these variations for managerial practice. Pluralistic contexts are those that are shaped by the divergent goals and interests of different groups inside and outside the organization. Internally, these divergent interests result in multiple organizing processes, while the interests of external stakeholders lead to multiple strategic goals and objectives. Despite the Fact that innate pluralism and the consequent complexity of strategizing and organizing processes are experienced by many organizations in the 21st century, pluralism has been inadequately examined in organisation studies and virtually ignored in the strategy literature. Having defined pluralism and explained its implications for strategizing and organizing practices and processes within organizations, three relevant questions are posed for investigating the nature of organizing and strategizing in pluralistic contexts. Case examples from the public sector, professional services and regulated industries are utilized to provide insights into these questions, and derive a framework that enables the drivers and potential problems of the interdependence between strategizing and organizing to be better understood. Practical implications for managing this interdependence are drawn.

Strategizing networks of power and influence:the internet and the struggle over contested space

Whilst some authors have portrayed the Internet as a powerful tool for business and political institutions, others have highlighted the potential of this technology for those vying to constrain or counter-balance the power of organizations, through e-collectivism and on-line action. What appears to be emerging is a contested space that has the potential to simultaneously enhance the power of organizations, whilst also acting as an enabling technology for the empowerment of grass-root networks. In this struggle, organizations are fighting for the retention of “old economy” positions, as well as the development of “new economy” power-bases. In realizing these positions, organizations and institutions are strategizing and manoeuvering in order to shape on-line networks and communications. For example, the on-line activities of individuals can be contained through various technological means, such as surveillance, and the structuring of the virtual world through the use of portals and “walled gardens”. However, loose groupings of individuals are also strategizing to ensure there is a liberation of their communication paths and practices, and to maintain the potential for mobilization within and across traditional boundaries. In this article, the unique nature and potential of the Internet are evaluated, and the struggle over this contested virtual space is explored.

Strategizing:the challenges of a practice perspective

While the strategy-as-practice research agenda has gained considerable momentum over the past five years, many challenges still remain in developing it into a robust field of research. In this editorial, we define the study of strategy from a practice perspective and propose five main questions that the strategy-as-practice agenda seeks to address. We argue that a coherent approach to answering these questions may be facilitated using an overarching conceptual framework of praxis, practices and practitioners. This framework is used to explain the key challenges underlying the strategy-as-practice agenda and how they may be examined empirically. In discussing these challenges, we refer to the contributions made by existing empirical research and highlight under-explored areas that will provide fruitful avenues for future research. The editorial concludes by introducing the articles in the special issue.

A estratégia como prática social : um estudo sobre a relação das práticas sociais dos gestores no “fazer estratégia” em uma empresa familiar

Este trabalho tem como objetivo compreender o “fazer estratégia” no seio de uma empresa familiar a partir das práticas sociais que envolvem os seus gestores. As práticas sociais são concebidas como um fenômeno social, o qual nasce e se desenvolve da interação e do relacionamento entre indivíduos em seu grupo social. Este grupo ou mundo social do indivíduo encontra-se em um processo constante de transformações em virtude da infinidade de interconexões sociais ali compartilhadas. Já o “fazer estratégia” apresenta-se aqui sob a ótica da estratégia como prática social que contempla “[...] como os praticantes de estratégia realmente agem e interagem [...]” (WHITTINGTON, 1996, p. 731), ou seja, a confluência entre as construções e práticas sociais cotidianas sobre seu “fazer estratégia”. A contemplação desses constructos teóricos possibilitou a formação de um esquema conceitual que por intermédio de um estudo de caso favoreceu o entendimento de “como as práticas sociais dos gestores se relacionam com o seu ‘fazer estratégia’ na empresa familiar?”. Para coleta de dados utilizou-se das técnicas: pesquisa documental, observação não-participante e entrevista semiestruturada (TRIVIÑOS, 1987). Os dados foram tratados através da técnica de Análise de Conteúdo na abordagem temática (BARDIN, 1977). Conclui-se com este estudo que as práticas sociais dos mais variados contextos nos quais os gestores da Empresa X se inserem, como o contexto familiar, interferem e se inter-relacionam diretamente no seu agir cotidiano e consequentemente no seu "fazer estratégia" a frente da empresa familiar, confirmando, estranhando e transformando a construção social dos sujeitos.

How middle managers contribute to strategy formation process: connection of strategy processes and strategy practices

The role of middle management is essential when managing integrative and emergent strategy formation processes. We stand out the importance of its role connecting micro and macro organizational level offering a very important contribution when examining the strategy-as-practice perspective and integrative strategy formation process. The main goal of this research is to analyse the relationship between the integrative strategy formation process and the roles of middle management under the strategy-as-practice perspective. To check it out we adopted a qualitative methodology droving a case analysis in a Spanish University. Data was collected by means of personal interviews with members of different levels of the Institution, documents analysis and direct observation. In advance of some results we find out that the University develops an integrative strategy formation process and confers to middle management an important role extended all over the organization.

Continente Choose&Drive

A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Management from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics

Analysis of the progress of lifelong learning strategies of Portuguese Economics and Management Schools

A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Management from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics

Tutkimus- ja kehitysyhteistyön motiivit

Pro gradu -tutkielman tavoitteena on operationalisoida T&K- yhteistyön prosessimaista luonnetta, eli tarkemmin sanottuna analysoida T&K-yhteistyösuhteidenmuodostumista ja motiiveja. Tutkielman hypoteesit muodostettiin analysoimalla yrityksen teknologiastrategiaan perustuvia uuden tiedon tuonnin ja olemassa olevan tiedon hyväksikäytön oppimistavoitteita. Motivaatio T&K- yhteistyölle syntyy mahdollisuudesta T&K- projektien riskien jakamiseen. T&K- yhteistyön motiiveja analysoitiin transaktio- ja byrokratiahyötyjen, jotka pohjautuvat mittakaava- ja synergiaeduille, lähteitä arvioiden. Hypoteeseja testattiin 276 suomalaisen teollisuusyrityksen otoksella. Otoksen yrityksillä oliollut T&K- toimintaa. Otos perustuu kyselyyn, joka toteutettiin Lappeenrannan teknillisen yliopiston kauppatieteiden osastolla vuonna 2004. Hypoteeseja testattiin tilastollisilla menetelmillä; lineaarisella regressioanalyysillä, parillisten ja riippumattomien otosten t-testeillä. Validiteetti- ja multikollineaarisuusongelman todennäköisyydet on huomioitu. Hypoteesit vahvistuivat osittain. Teknologisella epävarmuudella ja monimutkaisuudella ei ole suoraa vaikutusta T&K- yhteistyön intensiivisyyteen. Teknologisella epävarmuudella on osittainen vaikutus teknologiastrategian valintaan. Yrityksen transaktio- ja byrokratiahyödyt riippuvat teknologisista kyvykkyyksistä. Vain korkean teknologian alan yritykset saavuttavat hyötyjä myös intensiivisesti T&K- yhteistyösuhteita koordinoimalla. Teknologiaintensiivisyyteen perustuvien erot perustuvat teknologisen tiedon luonteeseen toimialalla. Transaktiokustannusteorian mukainenkustannusten minimointi ja kompetenssiperusteisten teorioiden mukainen strategisointi selittävät komplementaarisesti T&K-yhteistyösuhteiden muodostumista ja yrityksen rajojen määräytymistä.

Personal constructs in systemic practice

This paper intends to elaborate the relationship between Kelly's Personal Construct Theory (PCT) and the systemic therapies beyond their notable similarities. Kelly's constructive alternativism is situated in the context of the current constructivist orientation that the family therapy movement seems to be adopting. A model of change is presented based on PCT's experience cycle. From this cycle, the relationship between behaviors and constructions is elaborated incorporating Procter's (52, 53) notions of the Family Construct System (FCS) andposition. This model allows for interventions both at behavioral and construction levels, as well as allowing for a certain technical eclecticism while, at the same time, retaining a strong theoretical coherence. This approach is discussed in the context of the debate about strategizing, power, and control held by authors such as Golann, Hoffman, and Tomm. Finally, some implications for research are outlined.

Searching for keys to successful post-merger integration : a longitudinal case-study following a public sector merger

Unsuccessful mergers are unfortunately the rule rather than the exception. Therefore it is necessary to gain an enhanced understanding of mergers and post-merger integrations (PMI) as well as learning more about how mergers and PMIs of information systems (IS) and people can be facilitated. Studies on PMI of IS are scarce and public sector mergers are even less studied. There is nothing however to indicate that public sector mergers are any more successful than those in the private sector. This thesis covers five studies carried out between 2008 and 2011 in two organizations in higher education that merged in January 2010. The most recent study was carried out two years after the new university was established. The longitudinal case-study focused on the administrators and their opinions of the IS, the work situation and the merger in general. These issues were investigated before, during and after the merger. Both surveys and interviews were used to collect data, to which were added documents that both describe and guide the merger process; in this way we aimed at a triangulation of findings. Administrators were chosen as the focus of the study since public organizations are highly dependent on this staff category, forming the backbone of the organization and whose performance is a key success factor for the organization. Reliable and effective IS are also critical for maintaining a functional and effective organization, and this makes administrators highly dependent on their organizations’ IS for the ability to carry out their duties as intended. The case-study has confirmed the administrators’ dependency on IS that work well. A merger is likely to lead to changes in the IS and the routines associated with the administrators’ work. Hence it was especially interesting to study how the administrators viewed the merger and its consequences for IS and the work situation. The overall research objective is to find key issues for successful mergers and PMIs. The first explorative study in 2008 showed that the administrators were confident of their skills and knowledge of IS and had no fear of having to learn new IS due to the merger. Most administrators had an academic background and were not anxious about whether IS training would be given or not. Before the merger the administrators were positive and enthusiastic towards the merger and also to the changes that they expected. The studies carried out before the merger showed that these administrators were very satisfied with the information provided about the merger. This information was disseminated through various channels and even negative information and postponed decisions were quickly distributed. The study conflicts with the theories that have found that resistance to change is inevitable in a merger. Shortly after the merger the (third) study showed disappointment with the fact that fewer changes than expected had been implemented even if the changes that actually were carried out sometimes led to a more problematic work situation. This was seen to be more prominent for routine changes than IS changes. Still the administrators showed a clear willingness to change and to share their knowledge with new colleagues. This knowledge sharing (also tacit) worked well in the merger and the PMI. The majority reported that the most common way to learn to use new ISs and to apply new routines was by asking help from colleagues. They also needed to take responsibility for their own training and development. Five months after the merger (the fourth study) the administrators had become worried about the changes in communication strategy that had been implemented in the new university. This was perceived as being more anonymous. Furthermore, it was harder to get to know what was happening and to contact the new decision makers. The administrators found that decisions, and the authority to make decisions, had been moved to a higher administrative level than they were accustomed to. A directive management style is recommended in mergers in order to achieve a quick transition without distracting from the core business. A merger process may be tiresome and require considerable effort from the participants. In addition, not everyone can make their voice heard during a merger and consensus is not possible in every question. It is important to find out what is best for the new organization instead of simply claiming that the tried and tested methods of doing things should be implemented. A major problem turned out to be the lack of management continuity during the merger process. Especially problematic was the situation in the IS-department with many substitute managers during the whole merger process (even after the merger was carried out). This meant that no one was in charge of IS-issues and the PMI of IS. Moreover, the top managers were appointed very late in the process; in some cases after the merger was carried out. This led to missed opportunities for building trust and management credibility was heavily affected. The administrators felt neglected and that their competences and knowledge no longer counted. This, together with a reduced and altered information flow, led to rumours and distrust. Before the merger the administrators were convinced that their achievements contributed value to their organizations and that they worked effectively. After the merger they were less sure of their value contribution and effectiveness even if these factors were not totally discounted. The fifth study in November 2011 found that the administrators were still satisfied with their IS as they had been throughout the whole study. Furthermore, they believed that the IS department had done a good job despite challenging circumstances. Both the former organizations lacked IS strategies, which badly affected the IS strategizing during the merger and the PMI. IS strategies deal with issues like system ownership; namely who should pay and who is responsible for maintenance and system development, for organizing system training for new IS, and for effectively run IS even during changing circumstances (e.g. more users). A proactive approach is recommended for IS strategizing to work. This is particularly true during a merger and PMI for handling issues about what ISs should be adopted and implemented in the new organization, issues of integration and reengineering of IS-related processes. In the new university an ITstrategy had still not been decided 26 months after the new university was established. The study shows the importance of the decisive management of IS in a merger requiring that IS issues are addressed in the merger process and that IS decisions are made early. Moreover, the new management needs to be appointed early in order to work actively with the IS-strategizing. It is also necessary to build trust and to plan and make decisions about integration of IS and people.