989 resultados para rp93-395
Resumo:
Life other small business owners, family child care providers need adequate life, health, and disability insurance to protect their families from the loss of their income. However, child care providers also face unique risks. Perhaps the most important of these risks is the financial loss that would result if the provider were found liable or responsible for the injury or death of a child or a child's parent. If a claim were filed against you as a provider, three different types of financial losses are possible: medical expenses, damages awarded to the victim or his/her family after a lawsuit, and court costs related to your defense. This booklet will help you to: (1) evaluate options for insuring a family child care operation, and (2) evaluate available liability insurance policies.
Resumo:
Exame de emendas individuais e coletivas pelo Relator Bernardo Cabral. Conferência de assinaturas das emendas apresentadas ao projeto de Constituição. Apresentação pelo Constituinte Maurício Fruet da proposta de perda de mandato dos constituintes ausentes em plenário. Defesa da aprovação do Art.52 das Disposições Constitucionais Transitórias concernente à definição dos limites territoriais dos Estados do Acre e Rondônia.
C 233 INST-D 2013. 395 Muebles en madera de diversos géneros de función y combinación de materiales.
Resumo:
20 fotografías, nueve a color y once en tono de grises (los archivos digitales de algunas fotografías son de muy bajo pixelaje).
Resumo:
My thesis investigates the dynamics behind the changing nature of the leadership of the western Roman army in the fifth century through the concept of ‘warlordism’. I carried this out by analyzing those cases of insubordination and military unrest in the officer class of the western Roman army, which can be shown to be linked to the slow decline of central authority and the imperial office in the period 395-480. My thesis demonstrates that theories of ‘Warlordism’, as developed in social sciences, can be useful for both the late Imperial west as for other eras of ancient history, such as the late Roman republic. Warlordism was a way of continuing politics, if necessary by military means, when commanders found themselves outside the legitimate framework. Unlike the case of usurpation of the imperial office, when there was little hope of achieving permanent recognition and acceptance, it offered insubordinate officers a chance of returning to the ruling imperial regime depending on circumstances and the success of their resistance. I propose that warlordism functioned as an alternative to usurpation, a tool for military dissidence, fuelled by an economy of violence. Contrary to modern warlordism, the warlordism of the fifth century AD represented a transient phase which no imperial commander was willing to prolong indefinitely. At some stage, given the means, warlords in the western Roman army wanted to become part of the imperial echelon again. Yet these alternative methods of violent opposition, and the acquisition of force through private means, ensured the breakdown of the state’s monopoly on violence and the disintegration of centralized armies. What started as an accidental revolution became a new form of military rule.
Resumo:
Volumes of interest were published between 1812 and 1815 with articles about the War of 1812.
Resumo:
Pour toute demande de reproduction de contenu se trouvant dans cette publication, communiquer avec l’Association des diplômés de l’UdeM.
Resumo:
The Nathaniel Gist Gee Papers consist of various papers concerning Gee’s years in China including correspondence, reports, newspaper and magazine clippings, Chinese poetry, statistics, manifestos, statements, his professional papers concerned primarily with freshwater sponges, and professional papers and publications he collected that chronicle China’s growth. Many of the records are concerned with China’s political and social changes including China’s Nationalist and Student Movements during Gee’s stay in China. Nathaniel Gist Gee (1876-1937), born in Union, SC, was a professor of Natural Science at Soochow University and Yenching University in China from 1901-1932.
Resumo:
2 Briefe zwischen Luther L. Gobbel und Max Horkheimer, 28.09.1938, 03.10.1938; 2 Briefe zwischen Russell M. Story und Max Horkheimer, 15.03.1938; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Ralph E. Boothby, 14.03.1938; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Roswell G. Ham, 13.01.1938; 2 Briefe von Carl Schurz von der Memorial Foundation Philadelphia an Max Horkheimer, 1940; 7 Briefe zwischen Helen Schuster und Max Horkheimer, 1936, 1937, 1947-1948; 1 Brief von Liesel Schwaibold an Max Horkheimer, 19.01.1937; 6 Briefe zwischen Ph. Schwartz und Max Horkheimer, 1936-1937; 4 Briefe zwischen Ph. Schwart an Ludwig Jekels, 1936, 1937; 1 Brief von Ph. Schwartz an Karl Landauer,; 1 Brief von Eugen Schwarz an den Vater von Max Horkheimer, 08.12.1937; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Eugen Schwarz, 31.12.1937; 5 Briefe zwischen Olga Therese Schwarz und Max Horkheimer, 1942; 8 Briefe zwischen Alfred Schweizer und Max Horkheimer, 1940-1941; 1 Lebenslauf von Arthur Heinrich Schweitzer und 1 Bericht über Arthur Heinrich Schweitzer; 1 Brief von Josef Schwoner an Max Horkheimer, 20.06.1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an L. H. Seelye, 01.04.1935; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Dora Segall-Ziegellaub, 01.10.1935; 6 Briefe zwischen Matyes Seiber und Max Horkheimer, Juli 1936, 1936; 2 Briefe zwischen Alfred Seidenmann und Max Horkheimer, 29.02.1940, 12.03.1940 sowie Briefwechsel mit dem American Freinds Service Committee, Phiadelphia; 2 Briefe zwischen dem American Friends Service Committee und Max Horkheimer, 12.09.1940; 3 Rundschreiben von der Selbsthilfe Deutscher Ausgewanderter New York, 1937-1938; Antworten auf einen Fragebogen des Selective Service Occupational Questionnaire von Max Horkheimer, 27.10.1942; 1 Brief vom Selfhelp of Emigres from Central Europe an Margot von Mendelssohn, 22.12.1948; 8 Briefe zwischen Edwin R. A. Seligman und Max Horkheimer, 1938-1939; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Eustace Seligman, 11.03.1940; 1 Brief von Seligmann und Cia an Friedrich Pollock, 06.04.1936; 2 Brife zwischen Milton C. Seligman und Max Horkheimer, 1947; 1 Brief Stephen Schäfer an Thorsten Sellin, 07.02.1939; 17 Briefe zwischen Thorsten Sellin und Max Horkheimer, 1938-1941; 1 Brief von der Sherwin Cody School of English an Max Horkheimer, 06.02.1939; 3 Briefe und 1 Beilage zwischen Edward A. Shils und Max Horkheimer, 1938; 10 Briefe zwischen James T. Shotwell und Max Horkheimer, 01.07.1940-1941;