916 resultados para public use of history
Resumo:
Advertisements: p. [1] after p. xix, p. [1] after p. 167.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"Reflections upon exile": p. [349]-385.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Repr. from the Code of federal regulations, 36 CFR Ch. XII (7-1-88 ed.).
Resumo:
Annual.
Resumo:
"Presents the major findings of a survey undertaken by the Survey Research Center for the Public Library Inquiry."
Resumo:
Objectives To inform demand management strategies aimed at reducing congestion in EDs by: (i) identifying public use of EDs, decision-making and reasons; and (ii) measuring acceptance of alternative care models. Methods A cross-sectional telephone survey of a random sample of Queensland population aged 18 years or older residing in a dwelling unit in Queensland that could be contacted on a land-based telephone service was conducted. One person per household was selected according to a predetermined algorithm to ensure sex and regional balance were interviewed. The main outcome measures were: ED use, attitudes towards ED staff and services, and alternative models of care. Results The final sample included a total of 1256 respondents (response rate = 40.3%). Twenty-one per cent attended EDs in the preceding 12 months. The decision to attend was made by patients (51%), health and medical professionals (31%), and others (18%). The main reasons included perceived severity of the illness (47%), unavailability of alternative services (26%) and better care (11%). Most respondents agreed with more flexible care models of service delivery including incentives for general practitioners (90%), private health insurance coverage for ED use (89%), and enhanced roles for paramedics and nurses. Conclusions Main reason for attending ED is perceived severity of illness, followed by lack of alternative care. The majority of both consumers and the public are in favour of more flexible care models. However, further research is necessary to detail those alternatives and to test and validate their effectiveness.
Resumo:
Title Varies: Comparative Travel Data; Visitors To Areas Administered by the National Park Service; Public Use, National Parks and Related Areas; Public Use of the National Parks; a Statistical Report; Public Use of the National Parks
Resumo:
Esta investigación analiza la construcción del límite sur de la zona patrimonial de Bogotá de los años 80, a partir de dos procesos simultáneos: la demolición de un sector del barrio Santa Bárbara y la patrimonialización de La Candelaria. A pesar de que estos dos sectores de la ciudad hicieron parte de la ciudad antigua y compartieron un origen común, solo La Candelaria logró hacer parte de la zona considerada de valor histórico. Por lo tanto, este proyecto de grado se interesa, principalmente, por conocer por qué el barrio Santa Bárbara fue excluido del relato histórico de la ciudad, a partir del estudio de la discusión sobre su valor histórico que dio paso al uso público del pasado y a una “lucha por la memoria”, en palabras de Elizabeth Jelin.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
Since 1986, the Canadian Public Administration is required to analyze the socio-economic impact of new regulatory requirements or regulatory changes. To report on its analysis, a Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS) is produced and published in the Canada Gazette with the proposed regulation to which it pertains for notice to, and comments by, interested parties. After the allocated time for comments has elapsed, the regulation is adopted with a final version of the RIAS. Both documents are again published in the Canada Gazette. As a result, the RIAS acquires the status of an official public document of the Government of Canada and its content can be argued in courts as an extrinsic aid to the interpretation of a regulation. In this paper, an analysis of empirical findings on the uses of this interpretative tool by the Federal Court of Canada is made. A sample of decisions classified as unorthodox show that judges are making determinations on the basis of two distinct sets of arguments built from the information found in a RIAS and which the author calls “technocratic” and “democratic”. The author argues that these uses raise the general question of “What makes law possible in our contemporary legal systems”? for they underline enduring legal problems pertaining to the knowledge and the acceptance of the law by the governed. She concludes that this new interpretive trend of making technocratic and democratic uses of a RIAS in case law should be monitored closely as it may signal a greater change than foreseen, and perhaps an unwanted one, regarding the relationship between the government and the judiciary.