Ancillary Funds 2000-2012

Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs) are trusts to which Australian taxpayers can make tax deductible donations, enabling families, businesses and individuals to create a tax effective closely held charitable trust, whose sole purpose must be to provide money, property or benefits to deductible gift recipients. This Current Issues Information Sheet charts the movement in approval of PAFs, donations made to and distributions made by PAFs during the period 2000-01 to 2011-12. This information sheet also examines for the first time Public Ancillary Funds (PuAFs).

Accountable to everyone, or to no one? Perspectives on the accountability of Australian private ancillary funds

This thesis explores perspectives on the accountability of Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs), a type of Australian endowed philanthropic foundation. Privately established for a public benefit purpose, with limited formal accountability requirements, there are differing and sometimes conflicting perspectives on the nature and scope of PAF accountability. Through in-depth interviews with managers and trustees of 10 PAFs, forms and relationships of PAF accountability are uncovered. Findings reveal accountability for PAFs does not necessarily include public disclosure or transparency. However, engagement with accountability for a PAF results in greater impact and satisfaction for those involved.

Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs)

PAFs are trusts to which taxpayers can make tax deductible donations.1 The term private ancillary fund is defined in the taxation legislation and has some similarities with the US private family foundation. This new arrangement allows families, businesses and individuals to create a tax effective closely held charitable trust which was not possible prior to the initiative. The sole purpose of a PAF must be to provide money, property or benefits to funds, authorities or institutions, which are deductible gift recipients (DGRs).

Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs) 2000-2012

Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs) are trusts to which Australian taxpayers can make tax deductible donations, enabling families, businesses and individuals to create a tax effective closely held charitable trust, whose sole purpose must be to provide money, property or benefits to deductible gift recipients. This Current Issues Information Sheet charts the movement in approval of PAFs, donations made to and distributions made by PAFs during the period 2000-01 to 2011-12.

An official account of the charities and public trust funds belonging to each parish in the Blything union /

Mode of access: Internet.

The Australian Nonprofit Sector Legal Almanac 2014

The ACPNS nonprofit sector legal almanac provides summaries of legal cases involving nonprofit organisations, or of relevance to the work of nonprofits, particularly from Australia, but also New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. It also summarises legislative changes that relate to nonprofit organisations in all Australian jurisdictions, and includes short articles on relevant topics: mergers of not for profit organisations; public ancillary funds; charitable housing; and dispute resolution.

Badania wykorzystania przez polskie biblioteki naukowe środków europejskich, grantów ministerialnych i samorządowych oraz dotacji sponsorów w latach 2000-2008

Badania dotyczące pozyskiwania środków pomocowych przez polskie biblioteki naukowe przeprowadzone zostały w ramach wewnętrznych projektów badawczych Biblioteki Uniwersyteckiej w Poznaniu. Realizacji projektu podjął się Oddział Prac Naukowych, Wydawniczych i Dydaktycznych BU. Zadanie wykonano od września 2008 do czerwca 2009 roku. Zamierzeniem autorek artykułu było uzyskanie pełnej informacji na temat środków pozabudżetowych pozyskiwanych przez polskie biblioteki naukowe oraz określenie stopnia ich wykorzystania. Zastosowano metodę sondażu diagnostycznego z wykorzystaniem techniki ankiety. Przygotowany kwestionariusz ankiety wraz z informacją dla respondentów o celu prowadzonych badań skierowano do wszystkich bibliotek uniwersyteckich, bibliotek głównych uczelni technicznych, medycznych, ekonomicznych, bibliotek akademii wychowania fizycznego, uczelni pedagogicznych i rolniczych oraz do bibliotek publicznych posiadających status bibliotek naukowych. Łącznie wysłano 70 ankiet, odpowiedzi udzieliło 38 respondentów. Wskazany w artykule okres 2000-2008 był czasem zwiększonych możliwości uzyskiwania dodatkowych funduszy przez biblioteki. Najczęściej otrzymywane fundusze to dotacje ministerialne, dalej środki sponsorów na działalność podstawową. W poważnym stopniu wspierały biblioteki, głównie biblioteki publiczne, lokalne samorządy. Zauważalne były dotacje wspierające biblioteki przekazywane przez fundacje i środki ofiarowane przez sponsorów na działalność organizacyjną; ewenementem natomiast – subwencje unijne.

Fundos competitivo para o financiamento da pesquisa agrícola no Brasil: o caso do PRODETAB-EMPRAPA

Programas de Fundos Competitivos para financiamento da pesquisa agrícola há muito estão sendo implementados nos países desenvolvidos. Entretanto, somente a partir da década de 1990 a adoção desse mecanismo se intensificou nos países em desenvolvimento, especialmente na América Latina. Isso ocorreu em razão da redução dos recursos do governo federal para a pesquisa agrícola, o que levou as instituições de pesquisa a buscar fontes alternativas para o financiamento de sua programação. A partir desse cenário, o presente trabalho analisa e discute a importância dos Fundos Competitivos como alternativa criativa e inovadora na captação de recursos para o financiamento da pesquisa agrícola no Brasil. A análise é feita a partir de estudo teórico sobre esse mecanismo de financiamento e com base em um estudo de caso do Sistema Competitivo do PRODETAB, implementado e coordenado pela Embrapa. O objetivo foi o de avaliar a importância e a contribuição dos fundos competitivos para o aumento da eficiência na alocação dos recursos públicos para a pesquisa agrícola e para a melhoria da qualidade dos projetos de pesquisa e desenvolvimento

Fundos competitivos para o financiamento da pesquisa agrícola no Brasil: o caso do PRODETAB - Embrapa

Programas de Fundos Competitivos para financiamento da pesquisa agrícola há muito estão sendo implementados nos países desenvolvidos. Entretanto, somente a partir da década de 1990 a adoção desse mecanismo se intensificou nos países em desenvolvimento, especialmente na América Latina. Isso ocorreu em razão da redução dos recursos do governo federal para a pesquisa agrícola, o que levou as instituições de pesquisa a buscar fontes alternativas para o financiamento de sua programação. A partir desse cenário, o presente trabalho analisa e discute a importância dos Fundos Competitivos como alternativa criativa e inovadora na captação de recursos para o financiamento da pesquisa agrícola no Brasil. A análise é feita a partir de estudo teórico sobre esse mecanismo de financiamento e com base em um estudo de caso do Sistema Competitivo do PRODETAB, implementado e coordenado pela Embrapa. O objetivo foi o de avaliar a importância e a contribuição dos fundos competitivos para o aumento da eficiência na alocação dos recursos públicos para a pesquisa agrícola e para a melhoria da qualidade dos projetos de pesquisa e desenvolvimento.

Seleção de indicadores para a gestão de saúde no município

Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva - FMB

Presença de centrais e sindicatos no mercado financeiro: criação e gestão de fundos de pensão

O texto aborda o interesse de sindicatos e centrais sindicais pela criação e gestão de fundos de pensão no Brasil, durante o governo Lula, apontando as justificativas e crenças criadas pelos sindicalistas engajados nessa estratégia. Conclui que até o momento atual (fim do governo Lula), os fundos sindicais não foram efetivamente consolidados pelo governo, mas que sindicalistas ocupam postoschaves no mercado financeiro e na gestão de fundos de pensão de patrocínio público, tais como Previ e Petros, infl uenciando direta e indiretamente nas configurações precisas do capitalismo contemporâneo brasileiro.

Are State legislatures responding to public opinion when allocating funds for tobacco control programs?

This study explored the factors associated with state-level allocations to tobacco-control programs. The primary research question was whether public sentiment regarding tobacco control was a significant factor in the states' 2001 budget decisions. In addition to public opinion, several additional political and economic measures were considered. Significant associations were found between our outcome, state-level tobacco-control funding per capita, and key variables of interest including public opinion, amount of tobacco settlement received, the party affiliation of the governor, the state's smoking rate, excise tax revenue received, and whether the state was a major producer of tobacco. The findings from this study supported our hypothesis that states with citizens who favor more restrictive indoor air policies allocate more to tobacco control. Effective public education to change public opinion and the cultural norms surrounding smoking may affect political decisions and, in turn, increase funding for crucial public health programs.

Three applications of the marginal cost of public funds concept

This paper illustrates the use of the marginal cost of public funds concept in three contexts. First, we extend Parry’s (2003) analysis of the efficiency effects excise taxes in the U.K., primarily by incorporating the distortion caused by imperfect competition in the cigarette market and distinguishing between the MCFs for per unit and ad valorem taxes on cigarettes. Our computations show, contrary to the standard result in the literature, that the per unit tax on cigarettes has a slightly lower MCF than the ad valorem tax on cigarettes. Second, we calculate the MCF for a payroll tax in a labour market with involuntary unemployment, using the Shapiro and Stiglitz (1984) efficiency wage model as our framework. Our computations, based on Canadian labour market data, indicate that incorporating the distortion caused by involuntary unemployment raises the MCF by 25 to 50 percent. Third, we derive expressions for the distributionally-weighted MCFs for the exemption level and the marginal tax rate for a “flat tax”, such as the one that has been adopted by the province of Alberta. This allows us to develop a restricted, but tractable, version of the optimal income tax problem. Computations indicate that the optimal marginal tax rate may be quite high, even with relatively modest pro-poor distributional preferences.

The marginal cost of funds from public sector borrowing

An expression for the welfare cost of a marginal increase in the public debt is derived using a simple AK endogenous growth model. This measure of the marginal cost of public funds (MCF) can be interpreted as the marginal benefit-cost ratio that a debtfinanced public project needs in order to generate a net social gain. The model predicts an increase in the public debt ratio will have little effect on the optimal public expenditure ratio and that most of the adjustment will occur on the tax side of the budget.