Role of G protein coupled inwardly rectifier K+ channels (GIRK) on the neurobiology depression

353 págs.

The neurobiology of punishment.

Animals, in particular humans, frequently punish other individuals who behave negatively or uncooperatively towards them. In animals, this usually serves to protect the personal interests of the individual concerned, and its kin. However, humans also punish altruistically, in which the act of punishing is personally costly. The propensity to do so has been proposed to reflect the cultural acquisition of norms of behaviour, which incorporates the desire to uphold equity and fairness, and promotes cooperation. Here, we review the proximate neurobiological basis of punishment, considering the motivational processes that underlie punishing actions.

START: A Bridge between Emotion Theory and Neurobiology through Dynamic System Modeling

Lewis proposes "reconceptualization" (p. 1) of how to link the psychology and neurobiology of emotion and cognitive-emotional interactions. His main proposed themes have actually been actively and quantitatively developed in the neural modeling literature for over thirty years. This commentary summarizes some of these themes and points to areas of particularly active research in this area.

Towards a cognitive neurobiology of brain-gut axis disorders

The past two decades have seen substantial gains in our understanding of the complex processes underlying disturbed brain-gut communication in disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite a growing understanding of the neurobiology of brain-gut axis dysfunction, there is a relative paucity of investigations into how the various factors involved in dysregulating the brain-gut axis, including stress, immune activation and pain, could impact on fundamental brain processes such as cognitive performance. To this end, we proposed a cognitive neurobiology of brain-gut axis dysfunction and took a novel approach to examine how disturbed brain-gut interactions may manifest as altered cognitive performance in IBS and IBD, both cross-sectionally and prospectively. We have demonstrated that, disorders of the brain-gut axis are characterised by stable deficits in specific cognitive domains. Specifically, patients with IBS exhibit a consistent hippocampal mediated visuospatial memory impairment. In addition we have found evidence to suggest a similar visuospatial impairment in IBD. However, our most consistent finding within this population was that patients with Crohn’s disease exhibit impaired selective attention/ response inhibition on the classic Stroop interference test. These cognitive deficits may serve to perpetuate and sustain brain-gut axis dysfunction. Furthermore, this research has shed light on some of the underlying neurobiological mechanisms that may be mediating cognitive dysfunction in IBS. Our findings may have significant implications for the individual who suffers from a brain-gut axis disorder and may also inform future treatment strategies. Taken together, these findings can be incorporated into existing neurobiological models of brain-gut axis dysfunction, to develop a more comprehensive model accounting for the cognitive-neurobiology of brain-gut axis disorders. This has furthered our understanding of disease pathophysiology and may ultimately aid in both the diagnosis and treatment of these highly prevalent, but poorly understood disorders.

The neurobiology of meditation for the control of pain

La douleur est une expérience multidimensionnelle comportant des aspects sensoriels, émotionnels et cognitifs. Il a été montré que cette expérience peut être modulée par des facteurs psychologiques ou des interventions cognitives comme l’attention, la distraction, l’hypnose ou les attentes. La tradition orientale suggère également que la pratique de la méditation pourrait avoir des effets analgésiques. D’un point de vue théorique, plusieurs mécanismes pourraient expliquer ces effets. Cependant, très peu d’études ont testé ces hypothèses. Les études présentées dans cette thèse avaient donc pour objectif d’examiner les mécanismes analgésiques de la méditation. Dans un premier temps, une étude psychophysique a été réalisée afin de comparer les réponses à la douleur entre des adeptes de la méditation Zen et des sujets contrôles, dans différentes conditions attentionnelles. Durant la condition attentionnelle de type « mindful », les adeptes de la méditation ont présenté une plus faible sensibilité à la douleur, des réponses attentionnelles à la douleur atypiques et une diminution de la perception de la douleur associée à l’entraînement à la méditation. Une deuxième étude a été réalisée en imagerie par résonance magnétique fonctionnelle (IRMf) avec des groupes de participants similaires. Dans une condition sans méditation, les adeptes de la méditation ont présenté de plus fortes réponses nociceptives dans les régions primaires de la douleur. Les régions cérébrales associées aux processus d’évaluation, à la mémoire et aux émotions ont quant à elles montré une diminution d’activité. De plus, cette diminution était plus importante chez les adeptes de la méditation les plus expérimentés et elle était associée à des évaluations de douleur plus faibles. Par ailleurs, des changements de connectivité fonctionnelle entre le cortex préfrontal et une région primaires de la douleur étaient associés à la sensibilité à la douleur chez les adeptes de la méditation. Finalement, une étude d’imagerie cérébrale structurale (publiée comme deux études séparées) a été réalisée pour examiner les différences d’épaisseur corticale entre les groupes, pour des régions associées à la douleur. Les adeptes de la méditation ont présenté une épaisseur plus importante de matière grise dans plusieurs régions associées à la douleur et l’attention. De plus, ces différences étaient associées à une mesure expérientielle de l’attention, à la sensibilité à la douleur et à l’expérience de méditation. Dans l’ensemble, ces résultats suggèrent que la méditation pourrait influencer la perception de la douleur par des changements fonctionnels et physiques dans le cerveau. De plus, le patron d’activation et la modulation de l’expérience paraissent uniques en comparaison à ceux d’autres interventions, ce qui suggère qu’un état de détachement et un focus mental favorisent la dissociation entre les aspects désagréables et sensoriels d’un stimulus nociceptif.

NEUROBIOLOGY OF PYRIDOXINE

Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) is the major coenzymatic form of pyridoxine. There are over one hundred known pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-dependent reactions, most of which are involved in the metabolism of various amino acids . Pyridoxamine 5'-phosphate can function in aminotransf erase reactions by the cyclic regeneration of the two active phosphate forms. Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-dependent reactions studied in the nervous system are involved in the catabolism of various amino acids. The putative neurotransmitters , dopamine, norepinephrine , serotonin , histamine , aminobutyric acid and taurine , as well as the sphingoiipids and poly amines are synthesized by PLP-dependent enzymes. Of these enzymes, three ( glutamic acid decarboxylase , 5-hydroxytryptophan decarboxylase and crnithine decarboxylase) seem to have crucial roles (Fig. '). The clinical effects of pyridoxine deficiency can be explained on the basis of the known decreases in the activities of these enzymes

Nongenetic inheritance, linguistic competence, prenatal experience and behavior manipulation: recent contributions from behavioral neurobiology and neuropsychology to the explanation of behavior

This article gives an overview of presuppositions and explanations posed by behaviorist psychology (particularly its radical branch), cognitive–nativist sciences (i.e. psycholinguistics and a branch of cognitive psychology) and other disciplines regarding important psychological events such as anxiety, stress, fear, mood states and language. In relation to the discussion of environment versus genetics, contributions from behavioral neurobiology and neuropsychology are added, showing evidence of traits that can be multigenerationally inherited in a non-genetic way, which have an impact thought the life of organisms and on their way of interacting with the environment; ways in which behavior can be altered by recently unsuspected environmental agents or events, and the overlooked role of prenatal experiences in the explanation of behavior. The evidence calls into question presuppositions made by the academic disciplines listed above, and suggests alternative behavior reinterpretations and explanations

Neurobiology of expectancy effects and omission of reinforcement on behavior

The reinforcement omission effects have been traditionally interpreted in terms of: behavioral facilitation after reinforcement omission induced by primary frustration or behavioral suppression after reinforcement delivery induced by postconsummatory states. The studies reviewed here indicate that amygdala is involved in modulation of these effects. However, the fact that amygdala lesions, extensive or selective, can eliminate, reduce and enhance the omission effects makes it difficult to understand how it is the exact nature of their involvement. The amygdala is related to several functions that depend on its connections with other brain systems. Thus, it is necessary to consider the involvement of a more complex neural network in the modulation of the reinforcement omission effects. The connection of amygdala subareas to cortical and subcortical structures may be involved in this modulation since they also are linked to processes related to reward and expectancy.