999 resultados para moral semantics
Resumo:
Value and reasons for action are often cited by rationalists and moral realists as providing a desire-independent foundation for normativity. Those maintaining instead that normativity is dependent upon motivation often deny that anything called '"value" or "reasons" exists. According to the interest-relational theory, something has value relative to some perspective of desire just in case it satisfies those desires, and a consideration is a reason for some action just in case it indicates that something of value will be accomplished by that action. Value judgements therefore describe real properties of objects and actions, but have no normative significance independent of desires. It is argued that only the interest-relational theory can account for the practical significance of value and reasons for action. Against the Kantian hypothesis of prescriptive rational norms, I attack the alleged instrumental norm or hypothetical imperative, showing that the normative force for taking the means to our ends is explicable in terms of our desire for the end, and not as a command of reason. This analysis also provides a solution to the puzzle concerning the connection between value judgement and motivation. While it is possible to hold value judgements without motivation, the connection is more than accidental. This is because value judgements are usually but not always made from the perspective of desires that actually motivate the speaker. In the normal case judgement entails motivation. But often we conversationally borrow external perspectives of desire, and subsequent judgements do not entail motivation. This analysis drives a critique of a common practice as a misuse of normative language. The "absolutist" attempts to use and, as philosopher, analyze normative language in such a way as to justify the imposition of certain interests over others. But these uses and analyses are incoherent - in denying relativity to particular desires they conflict with the actual meaning of these utterances, which is always indexed to some particular set of desires.
Resumo:
1 O direio constitucional português ao trabalho: introdução; 1.1 Alguns direitos e deveres constitucionais no contexto do Direito constitucional do trabalho português; 2 Algumas ideias sobre o assédio moral ou psicológico; 3 Conclusão.Resumo – Abstract: tanto o assédio moral, como uma das suas espécies, o assédio sexual, tornaram-se numa espécie de ilícito, quer em termos civis, quer, por exemplo, em termos criminais, que cada vez se torna mais comum no local de trabalho e/ou estudo, e com graves consequências para os mais básicos direitos fundamentais individuais e colectivos. Determinados direitos, liberdades e garantias passam a estar em perigo ou não bastasse a sua consagração constitucional apenas teórica.
Resumo:
Resumo: O direito constitucional português ao trabalho: introdução § Algumas ideias sobre o assédio moral ou psicológico: as principais vítimas, as diferenças do bullying (e/ou intimidação ou tiranizar), os fundamentos, o seu estudo § O contexto do ordenamento jurídico português: algumas consequências do assédio moral § O direito geral à personalidade § A distinção entre o assédio moral e outras figuras § O assédio sexual faz parte do assédio moral em sentido amplo § Dentro do problema do “assédio moral”, da “liberdade moral” e, nomeadamente, dos crimes contra a liberdade sexual e autodeterminação sexual, algumas notas, de Direito penal, sobre a “coação sexual”: responsabilidade penal § O assédio moral no ordenamento jurídico português e, designadamente, no contexto do Direito do trabalho § O assédio moral como doença profissional, a hipótese de ocorrer suicídio e a eventual responsabilidade civil § Conclusão § “Ideia final” § Abstract: The Portuguese constitucional law to the work (labour): introduction § Some ideas on the moral or psychological siege (general mobbing): the main victims, the differences of bullying (and/or intimidation or “the labour tyrant”), the beddings, its study § The context of the Portuguese legal system § The context of the Portuguese legal system: some effects of the moral siege (general mobbing) § The general right to the personality § The distinction between the moral siege (general mobbing) and other figures § The sexual siege (sexual harassement or sexual mobbing) is part of the moral siege(general mobbing) in ample direction § Inside of the problem of the “moral siege” (general mobbing), “moral freedom” e, nominated, of the crimes against the sexual freedom and sexual self-determination, some notes, of Criminal law, on the “sexual coercion”: criminal liability § The moral siege (general mobbing) in Portuguese legal system and, appointedly, in the context of the Law of the work (labour law) § The moral siege (general mobbing) as ocupational disease, the hypothesis to occur suicide and the eventual civil liability § Conclusion § “Final Idea”
Resumo:
Tese de Doutoramento em Filosofia (área de especialização em Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea).
Resumo:
I analyze, in the context of business and science research collaboration, how the characteristics of partnership agreements are the result of an optimal contract between partners. The final outcome depends on the structure governing the partnership, and on the informational problems towards the efforts involved. The positive effect that the effort of each party has on the success of the other party, makes collaboration a preferred solution. Divergence in research goals may, however, create conflicts between partners. This paper shows how two different structures of partnership governance (a centralized, and a decentralized ones) may optimally use the type of project to motivate the supply of non-contractible efforts. Decentralized structure, however, always choose a project closer to its own preferences. Incentives may also come from monetary transfers, either from partners sharing each other benefits, or from public funds. I derive conditions under which public interventio
Resumo:
Business ethicists often assume that unethical behavior arises when individuals deviate from the norms and responsibilities that are institutionalized to frame economic activities. People's greed motivates them to violate the rules of the game. In Kohlberg's terms, it is assumed that such actors make decisions in a preconventional way and act opportunistically. In this article, we propose an alternative interpretation of deviant behavior, arguing that such behavior does not result from a lack of conventional moral guidance but rather from the fact that characteristics attributed to preconventional morality by Kohlberg - the purely incentive and punishment driven opportunistic morality - have become the conventionalized morality. The prevailing norms that economic actors have internalized as their yardstick are those of the preconventional Homo economicus. Not the deviation from, but the compliance with the rules of the game explains many forms of harmful and illegal decisions made in corporations.
Resumo:
Over the last few years, there has been a surge of work in a new field called "moral psychology", which uses experimental methods to test the psychological processes underlying human moral activity. In this paper, I shall follow this line of approach with the aim of working out a model of how people form value judgements and how they are motivated to act morally. I call this model an "affective picture": 'picture' because it remains strictly at the descriptive level and 'affective' because it has an important role for affects and emotions. This affective picture is grounded on a number of plausible and empirically supported hypotheses. The main idea is that we should distinguish between various kinds of value judgements by focusing on the sort of state of mind people find themselves in while uttering a judgement. "Reasoned judgements" are products of rational considerations and are based on preliminary acceptance of norms and values. On the contrary, "basic value judgements" are affective, primitive and non-reflective ways of assessing the world. As we shall see, this analysis has some consequences for the traditional internalism-externalism debate in philosophy; it highlights the fact that motivation is primarily linked to "basic value judgements" and that the judgements we openly defend might not have a particular effect on our actions, unless we are inclined to have an emotional attitude that conforms to them.
Resumo:
Background Decisions on limiting life-sustaining treatment for patients in the vegetative state (VS) are emotionally and morally challenging. In Germany, doctors have to discuss, together with the legal surrogate (often a family member), whether the proposed treatment is in accordance with the patient's will. However, it is unknown whether family members of the patient in the VS actually base their decisions on the patient's wishes. Objective To examine the role of advance directives, orally expressed wishes, or the presumed will of patients in a VS for family caregivers' decisions on life-sustaining treatment. Methods and sample A qualitative interview study with 14 next of kin of patients in a VS in a long-term care setting was conducted; 13 participants were the patient's legal surrogates. Interviews were analysed according to qualitative content analysis. Results The majority of family caregivers said that they were aware of aforementioned wishes of the patient that could be applied to the VS condition, but did not base their decisions primarily on these wishes. They gave three reasons for this: (a) the expectation of clinical improvement, (b) the caregivers' definition of life-sustaining treatments and (c) the moral obligation not to harm the patient. If the patient's wishes were not known or not revealed, the caregivers interpreted a will to live into the patient's survival and non-verbal behaviour. Conclusions Whether or not prior treatment wishes of patients in a VS are respected depends on their applicability, and also on the medical assumptions and moral attitudes of the surrogates. We recommend repeated communication, support for the caregivers and advance care planning.
Resumo:
Aquest Treball Final de Carrera de la Llicenciatura de Periodisme de la Universitat Abat Oliba CEU té un doble objectiu: a)dur a terme una aproximació teòrico-filosòfica a la proposta cultural de Charles Taylor, i així aprofundir en l'examen dels elements centrals de la seva bibliografia -sobre tot en els pressupòsits antropològics i socials més destacats, així com també en el seu peculiar "ideal d'autenticitat"-; i b)projectar els dits fonaments teòrics en un apartat de naturalesa pràctica, com a forma de concretar la proposta del pensador nord-americà en algun dels fenòmens més interessants de la realitat mediàtica i cultural espanyola. Així, ens vam decidir per un dels programes televisius que més èxit ha tingut al nostre país als darrers temps: Operación Triunfo, donat que en tractar-se d'un concurs vinculat als somnis i a les aspiracions més profundes dels individus que hi participen, té una relació molt més estreta amb l'ideal d'autenticitat. A més, la justificació fonamental d'aquest estudi es basa en el fet que l'aportació filosòfica de Taylor és molt profitosa respecte a la situació cultural actual pels següents dos motius: a) la seva obra presenta una veritable i complerta proposta en positiu, basada en raons i arguments molt clars, que a més porten una esperança de recuperació a la societat occidental; i b) la seva crítica a la Modernitat no és totalment destructiva sinó que més aviat es basa en una comprensió correcta i una recuperació adequada del sentit originari d'algunes de les fonts morals que defineixen la nostra cultura.
Resumo:
Cet ouvrage a pour objet de faire un point actualisé sur l'environnement légal et réglementaire de la recherche biomédicale. En effet, le médecin est un acteur fondamental dans l'organisation et la mise en oeuvre d'une recherche biomédicale. La loi du 20 décembre 1988 a redéfini son rôle exact ; elle l'a également mis en charge de nouvelles obligations : responsabilité déontologique, civile et pénale, obligations administratives et financières. Dans le cadre d'essais cliniques, l'accent est mis sur les relations patients/investigateurs. Cet ouvrage a donc pour but de fournir aux médecins les informations dont ils peuvent avoir besoin dans le cadre de leur intervention dans les recherches biomédicales.
Resumo:
This paper examines competition between generic and brand-name drugs in the regulated Spanish pharmaceutical market. A nested logit demand model is specified for the three most consumed therapeutic subgroups in Spain: statins (anticholesterol), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (antidepressants) and proton pump inhibitors (antiulcers). The model is estimated with instrumental variables from a panel of monthly prescription data from 1999 to 2005. The dataset distinguishes between three different levels of patients’ copayments within the prescriptions and the results show that the greater the level of insurance that the patient has (and therefore the lower the patient’s copayment), the lower the proportion of generic prescriptions made by physicians. It seems that the low level of copayment has delayed the penetration of generics into the Spanish market. Additionally, the estimation of the demand model suggests that the substitution rules and promotional efforts associated with the reference pricing system have increased generic market share, and that being among the first generic entrants has an additional positive effect.