Nazis by Kraut: A playful application of moral self-licensing

Doing something moral gives one a license to do something immoral. This form of moral compen-sation is called “moral self-licensing”. Interestingly, the moral behavior can take place in another domain than the subsequent immoral behavior. For example, buying eco-friendly products gives one a license to steal. This article is based on the idea that a healthy diet has a moral dimension. As a consequence, consuming a healthy product should give one a license for immoral behavior. This research supports this hypothesis on a playful study. This study shows that drinking sauerkraut juice contributes to a stronger support of Nazi-esque right wing ideology than drinking either nothing or a less-healthy beverage (Nestea).

Self-licensing and financial rewards: is morality for sale?

This paper studies the impact of financially rewarding good deeds on self-licensing. We run a between-subjects experiment comprised of an adapted dictator game preceded by paid and unpaid pro-environmental tasks. We find that prefacing the dictator game with an unpaid good deed seems to establish a 'moral rectitude' which licenses subsequent selfish behaviour, whereas a paid good deed dampens this effect. Interestingly, the nature of the initial task has more of an effect on the binary option (give vs. not give) than on the amount donated.

Smug alert! Exploring self-licensing behaviour in a cheating game

We test experimentally a prediction of the ‘moral credit model’, in which committing a virtuous act creates moral credits that can license immoral behavior in a succeeding decision. We use a basic cheating experiment that was either preceded by a virtuous deed or not in a developing country context. We found that people who previously achieved a good deed cheat more. Gender and origin are also significant explicative variables for cheating.

They Say You are a Danger But You Are Not: Representations and Construction of the Moral Self in Narratives of 'Dangerous Individuals'

This article is based on an analysis of narratives of 26 offenders with mental health problems living in the United Kingdom. It explores the impact of an ascribed dangerous status and the construction of the self as moral and responsible in response to this label with reference to the literature on denial, deviance disavowal and other “techniques of neutralization” and Goffman's presentation of self. Two dominant strands are identified in relation to the construction of moral self-hood: “Not my fault” and “Good at heart” narratives. “Techniques of neutralization” are widely drawn on, particularly denial of responsibility in the “Not my fault” narratives that seek to explain anti-social behavior with reference to external forces such as a hostile environment inhibiting their ability to control their lives. In contrast, “Good at heart” narratives draw on the essentially good and moral nature of the inner-self. Both are used as evidence of sharing and adhering to moral norms in order to present an acceptable and credible self.

Moral cleansing and moral licenses: experimental evidence

Research on moral cleansing and moral self-licensing has introduced dynamic considerations in the theory of moral behavior. Past bad actions trigger negative feelings that make people more likely to engage in future moral behavior to offset them. Symmetrically, past good deeds favor a positive self-perception that creates licensing effects, leading people to engage in behavior that is less likely to be moral. In short, a deviation from a “normal state of being” is balanced with a subsequent action that compensates the prior behavior. We model the decision of an individual trying to reach the optimal level of moral self-worth over time and show that under certain conditions the optimal sequence of actions follows a regular pattern which combines good and bad actions. We conduct an economic experiment where subjects play a sequence of giving decisions (dictator games) to explore this phenomenon. We find that donation in the previous period affects present decisions and the sign is negative: participants’ behavior in every round is negatively correlated to what they did in the past. Hence donations over time seem to be the result of a regular pattern of self-regulation: moral licensing (being selfish after altruist) and cleansing (altruistic after selfish).

Self-licensing effects on food choices

Recalling an egoistic act nudges people to choose healthy over unhealthy food options. Conversely, participants preferred unhealthy over healthy food options when they recalled an altruistic deed. Consistent with this choice pattern participants were willing to pay more for healthy than for unhealthy options. This experiment extends the self-licensing literature.

Priming moral self-ambivalence heightens deliberative behaviour in self-ambivalent individuals

Background: Recent work on cognitive-behavioural models of obsessive-compulsive disorder has focused on the roles played by various aspects of self-perception. In particular, moral self-ambivalence has been found to be associated with obsessive-compulsive phenomena. Aims: In this study we used an experimental task to investigate whether artificially priming moral self-ambivalence would increase participants' deliberation on ethical problems, an index that might be analogous to obsessive-compulsive behaviour. Method: Non-clinical participants completed two online tasks designed to prime either moral self-ambivalence, general uncertainty, or neither. All participants then completed a task requiring them to consider solutions to moral dilemmas. We recorded the time participants took to respond to the dilemmas and the length of their responses; we then combined these variables to create a measure of deliberation. Results: Priming moral self-ambivalence led to increases in deliberation, but this was only significant among those participants who scored highly on a baseline measure of moral self-ambivalence. Priming general uncertainty had no significant effect upon deliberation. Conclusions: The results suggest that moral self-ambivalence may play a role in the maintenance of obsessive-compulsive behaviour. We propose that individuals who are morally self-ambivalent might respond to situations in which this ambivalence is made salient by exhibiting behaviour with obsessive-compulsive characteristics. These findings have implications for the incorporation of ideas about self-concept into theories of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Moral Masculinities: Ethical Self-fashionings of Professional Chinese Men in London

Through qualitative interviews and examination of textual sources, this essay investigates the gendered, class and cultural subjectivities of transnational, highly-educated Chinese men living and working in London. Narrative analysis of the interviews of two participants suggests that they exhibit hybrid “bricolage masculinities,” which incorporate elements from Western educational and corporate cultures, and also appropriate concepts and practices from the Confucian tradition of moral self-cultivation. A discussion of contemporary texts that support the revival of Confucian masculinities illuminates the discursive context in which the participants’ ethical self-fashionings take place. The study argues that the cosmopolitan yet culturally embedded masculinities of the participants are suggestive of how professional Chinese men, as they step onto the world stage, seek to insert themselves more advantageously into local and global power relations of gender, class and nation.

Completed egoism and intended altruism boost healthy food choices

Based on the self-licensing literature and goal theory, we expected and found that completed (im)moral actions lead to markedly different food choices (Studies 1 & 2) than intended (im)moral actions (Study 2). In Study 1, people more often chose healthy over unhealthy food options when they recalled a completed egoistic action than when they recalled a completed altruistic action. Study 2 confirmed this finding and furthermore showed that the self-licensing effect in food choices is moderated by the action stage (completed vs. intended) of the moral or immoral action. This article extends the existing self-licensing literature and opens up new perspectives for changing consumers’ food consumption behavior.

Quo vadis, Philosoph und Philosophin ?

Diese Arbeit sucht nach den Erwerbstätigkeiten und Kompetenzen deutscher Philosophie-Absolvent(inn)en und nach der Wahrheit ihrer angeblichen Arbeitslosenquote. Anhand von EU-Papieren werden Anknüpfungspunkte für kompetenzorientierte Philosophie-Lehre aufgezeigt. Es wird dargestellt, wie Philosoph(inn)en die Kompetenzdiskussion sowohl in Deutschland als auch – über die OECD – international beeinfluss(t)en und mit gestalt(et)en. Die notwendige Voraussetzung für Lernen und Kompetenzentwicklung ist die Plastizität unseres Gehirnes. Biographisch beginnt das Lernen in der Schule und findet sein vorläufiges Ende in der Arbeitswelt. Diese Arbeit versucht, den zwischen schul- und arbeitsweltorientierten Kompetenzforschern bestehenden Graben zu überwinden. Problemlösefähigkeit in internationalen Teams wird für die gelingende Zukunft unserer Welt als wesentliche fachübergreifende Kompetenz erachtet. Für den in Deutschland sehr einflussreichen Kompetenzforscher John Erpenbeck ist die Selbstorganisationsfähigkeit ein Ankerpunkt. Für den Entwickler der noch heute in Deutschland anerkannten Kompetenzbereiche (Sach-, Sozial- und Selbstkompetenz), Heinrich Roth, liegt die "Höchstform menschlicher Handlungsfähigkeit" in der moralischen Selbstbestimmung. Die Zukunft wird zeigen, inwieweit das Verständnis von Regeln, Werten und Normen bei den arbeitswissenschaftlichen Kompetenzforschern im Korsett einer jeweiligen Unternehmensphilosophie verbleibt, oder inwieweit die Selbstorganisationsfähigkeit im Sinne einer moralischen Selbstbestimmung des Einzelnen die Unternehmensphilosophie prägt. In literaturhistorischen Anhängen wird ein assoziatives Feld von Einzelinformationen dargeboten, die einen roten Faden im Sinne eines sich aufbauenden Argumentes vermissen lassen. Vordergründig wird nur ein loses Band von John Dewey und William James bis Heinrich Roth und die heutige Zeit hergestellt. Hintergründig will der Autor darauf hinweisen, dass es einen Unterschied macht, ob sich der Begriff "Selbstorganisationsfähigkeit" aus einer physikalischen oder einer biologischen Wurzel entwickelt. Der Autor sieht keinen zwingenden Grund für das Bestehen eines eigenständigen Studienganges "Philosophie". Allerdings kann er auch nicht erkennen, warum er abgeschafft werden sollte.

Do good deeds make bad people?

According to the so-called ‘self-licensing effect’, committing to a virtuous act in a preceding choice may lead to behave less virtuously in the succeeding decision. Consequently, well-intentioned policies can lead to overall counter-productive effects by licensing people to behave badly in related behaviors. On the other side, motivational crowding theory argues that constraining people to adopt a desirable behavior can backfire. We use of a classroom experiment to test whether a regulatory framework to incentivize individuals to adopt pro-environmental behavior generate similar spillovers in terms of licensing effect than a non-regulatory framework. We show that the way the good deed is caused doesn’t seem to influence the licensing effect. Nevertheless, we found that business- and environmental-orientated majors react adversely to the regulatory framework. We show that environmental-orientated students exhibit higher intrinsically motivations than business-orientated ones. Accordingly, we suggest that the licensing effect is more likely to arise when the preceding ‘virtuous’ act is freely chosen (respectively regulatory caused) for non-intrinsically (respectively intrinsically) motivated individuals.

La fábula del buen escritor y del escritor bueno : Monterroso por sí mismo

El presente trabajo se propone analizar algunos tópicos recurrentes en la crítica de la obra de Augusto Monterroso, en especial aquél que caracteriza al autor como un renovador de la fábula clásica y un subversor de sus contenidos morales. Nos interesa revisar esos discursos críticos a la luz de una lectura de los aspectos axiológicos de La oveja negra y demás fábulas y de las estrategias autorales desplegadas en otros textos por el propio autor

La fábula del buen escritor y del escritor bueno : Monterroso por sí mismo

El presente trabajo se propone analizar algunos tópicos recurrentes en la crítica de la obra de Augusto Monterroso, en especial aquél que caracteriza al autor como un renovador de la fábula clásica y un subversor de sus contenidos morales. Nos interesa revisar esos discursos críticos a la luz de una lectura de los aspectos axiológicos de La oveja negra y demás fábulas y de las estrategias autorales desplegadas en otros textos por el propio autor

La fábula del buen escritor y del escritor bueno : Monterroso por sí mismo

El presente trabajo se propone analizar algunos tópicos recurrentes en la crítica de la obra de Augusto Monterroso, en especial aquél que caracteriza al autor como un renovador de la fábula clásica y un subversor de sus contenidos morales. Nos interesa revisar esos discursos críticos a la luz de una lectura de los aspectos axiológicos de La oveja negra y demás fábulas y de las estrategias autorales desplegadas en otros textos por el propio autor

Integrity, attribution, and exploitation : contractual and normative moral rights protection in open licensing

Over the last twenty years, the use of open content licenses has become increasingly and surprisingly popular. The use of such licences challenges the traditional incentive-based model of exclusive rights under copyright. Instead of providing a means to charge for the use of particular works, what seems important is mitigating against potential personal harm to the author and, in some cases, preventing non-consensual commercial exploitation. It is interesting in this context to observe the primacy of what are essentially moral rights over the exclusionary economic rights. The core elements of common open content licences map somewhat closely to continental conceptions of the moral rights of authorship. Most obviously, almost all free software and free culture licences require attribution of authorship. More interestingly, there is a tension between social norms developed in free software communities and those that have emerged in the creative arts over integrity and commercial exploitation. For programmers interested in free software, licence terms that prohibit commercial use or modification are almost completely inconsistent with the ideological and utilitarian values that underpin the movement. For those in the creative industries, on the other hand, non-commercial terms and, to a lesser extent, terms that prohibit all but verbatim distribution continue to play an extremely important role in the sharing of copyright material. While prohibitions on commercial use often serve an economic imperative, there is also a certain personal interest for many creators in avoiding harmful exploitation of their expression – an interest that has sometimes been recognised as forming a component of the moral right of integrity. One particular continental moral right – the right of withdrawal – is present neither in Australian law or in any of the common open content licences. Despite some marked differences, both free software and free culture participants are using contractual methods to articulate the norms of permissible sharing. Legal enforcement is rare and often prohibitively expensive, and the various communities accordingly rely upon shared understandings of acceptable behaviour. The licences that are commonly used represent a formalised expression of these community norms and provide the theoretically enforceable legal baseline that lends them legitimacy. The core terms of these licences are designed primarily to alleviate risk in sharing and minimise transaction costs in sharing and using copyright expression. Importantly, however, the range of available licences reflect different optional balances in the norms of creating and sharing material. Generally, it is possible to see that, stemming particularly from the US, open content licences are fundamentally important in providing a set of normatively accepted copyright balances that reflect the interests sought to be protected through moral rights regimes. As the cost of creation, distribution, storage, and processing of expression continues to fall towards zero, there are increasing incentives to adopt open content licences to facilitate wide distribution and reuse of creative expression. Thinking of these protocols not only as reducing transaction costs but of setting normative principles of participation assists in conceptualising the role of open content licences and the continuing tensions that permeate modern copyright law.