Outcome Analysis of Immediate and Delayed Conservative Breast Surgery Reconstruction With Mastopexy and Reduction Mammaplasty Techniques

Background: Bilateral mammaplasty or mastopexy is frequently used for oncoplastic objectives. However, little information has been available regarding outcome following immediate and delayed reconstruction. Method: Patients were divided into Group I (immediate reconstruction) and Group II (delayed reconstruction). Retrospective review was performed to compare complications, length of hospital stay, revision surgeries, and satisfaction. The associations between the complications with potential risk factors (timing, age, body mass index, smoking, and comorbid medical conditions) were analyzed. Results: There were a total of 144 patients with a mean follow-up of 47 months. Of the 106 patients in Group I, complications occurred in 24 (22.6%), skin necrosis was observed in 7.5%, fat necrosis in 5.6%, and 6.6% patients developed local recurrence. Mean period of hospitalization was 1.89 days. Of the 38 patients of the Group II, complications occurred in 12 (31.5%), skin necrosis was observed in 7 (18.4%), fat necrosis in 4 (10.5%), and 5.2% patients developed local recurrence. Mean period of hospitalization was 1.35 days. Increased length of hospital stay greater than 1 day (P < 0.001) and the number of revision surgeries (P = 0.043) were associated with the timing of the reconstruction. In univariate analysis, no difference between groups was found with respect to complication incidence (P = 0.275); however, after adjusting for other risk factors, the probability of complications tend to be higher for Group II (OR = 2.65; 95% confidence interval - 1.01-7.00; P = 0.049). Conclusions: On the basis of the results of our study, the probability of complications tends to be higher for delayed reconstructions, and it is demonstrated that obesity and smoking are risk factors for complications. Ultimately, these data may facilitate the provision of individualized risk information for shared medical decision-making.

Impacto de dos técnicas quirúrgicas sobre la recaída local de carcinoma de mama en pacientes de una clínica de Bogotá D.C.

Introducción: El carcinoma de mama es el tumor maligno más frecuente entre las mujeres y representa una significativa mortalidad en los países en vías de desarrollo. Según datos del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología en el 2010 se reportaron 672 nuevos casos de cáncer de mama, lo que representó el 18% de todos los tumores malignos en mujeres. Durante las últimas 3 décadas las técnicas quirúrgicas para el tratamiento del cáncer de mama han presentado un cambio significativo y proponen disminución de procedimientos agresivos y radicales, intervenciones como: mastectomía radical modificada, cirugía conservadora y la disección de ganglio centinela son ejemplos claros de esta evolución asociado al incremento de la reconstrucción mamaria inmediata. Metodología: Estudio observacional tipo cohorte retrospectivo en el cual se revisó una base de datos de pacientes con cáncer de mama de las cuales 632 fueron sometidas a mastectomía radical con preservación de piel y complejo areola-pezón y mastectomía radical con preservación de piel sin preservación del complejo areola-pezón, los dos procedimientos asociados a reconstrucción mamaria inmediata y se comparó la frecuencia de recaída local entre los dos grupos. Resultados: De las 632 pacientes estudiadas al 30.5% se les realizo preservación del complejo areola pezón. Las mujeres a quienes se les realizó preservación del complejo areola pezón presentaron menor sobrevida a la recaída local a 10 años (80.51%) comparado con las mujeres a quienes no se les preservó el complejo areola pezón (87.40%), sin embargo no se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa para determinar que las probabilidades de sobrevida sean diferentes. Discusión: No se evidenció diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los 2 procedimientos quirúrgicos (con y sin preservación del complejo areola pezón) en relación a la recaída local, estudios retrospectivos no han evidenciado una mayor tasa de recaídas locales en pacientes a quienes se les preserva el complejo areola-pezón, sin embargo hacen falta estudios prospectivos y aleatorizados que puedan otorgar un mayor sustento científico que garantice la seguridad de la preservación del complejo areola-pezón.

Mastopexia após perda ponderal maciça: suspensão dérmica, remodelação do parênquima e aumento com tecido autógeno

INTRODUÇÃO: Pacientes com perda ponderal significativa podem apresentar mamas com ptose acentuada, perda de projeção do polo superior e excesso de tecido na porção toracolateral. Rubin & Khachi descreveram técnica de mastopexia com suspensão dérmica e remodelação do parênquima associada a aumento com tecido autógeno, tratando a deformidade mamária e o excesso toracolateral em um só estágio. Neste trabalho, é ilustrada essa técnica cirúrgica e demonstradas sua reprodutibilidade e suas complicações. MÉTODO: Foram operadas 14 pacientes com deformidade graus 2 e 3 pela Escala de Pittsburgh, no Hospital Estadual de Sapopemba (São Paulo, SP, Brasil), no período de dezembro de 2008 a dezembro de 2009, utilizando a técnica referida. Foram analisados os seguintes dados: tipos de deformidade das mamas, translocação do complexo areolopapilar (CAP), dimensões dos retalhos, tempo cirúrgico, tempo de permanência do dreno e incidência de complicações. RESULTADOS: A média de idade das pacientes foi de 41,21 + 7,67 anos e o índice de massa corporal médio foi de 29,30 + 2,77. O tempo de seguimento das pacientes variou de 3 meses a 18 meses, com média de 8 meses. Dentre as 14 pacientes operadas, 4 (28,6%) apresentavam deformidade grau 3 e 10 (71,4%), grau 2. A média de translocação do CAP foi de 6,38 cm. As dimensões médias do retalho foram de 25,21 cm x 6,92 cm. O tempo cirúrgico médio foi de 188,57 minutos. Os drenos permaneceram, em média, por 6,21 dias. Foram observadas as seguintes complicações: epiteliose de CAP, deiscência na junção do T, hematoma pequeno e linfedema toracolateral. CONCLUSÕES: A mastopexia com suspensão dérmica, remodelação do parênquima e aumento com tecido autólogo é uma técnica reprodutível, rápida e com baixo índice de complicações.

[Surgical therapy of gynecomastia]

Nowadays surgical intervention is an essential part of the treatment of idiopathic gynecomastia. Choosing the right method is crucial and is based on the current status in the clinical and histological evaluation. Before finalizing the process of choosing a specific method a prior interdisciplinary evaluation of the patient is necessary to ascertain clear indications for a surgical intervention. Liposuction is one of the methods which have become popular in recent years. The advantages are the possible combination with traditional techniques, such as subcutaneous mastectomy or periareolar mastopexy. The main indication is for gynecomastia stage IIa/b and is justifiable due to the reduction in surgical complications and scarring. Furthermore this technique provides an excellent aesthetical outcome for the patient. A total of 162 patients suffering from gynecomastia stages I-III (according to Simon) were surgically treated between 2000 and 2010 and these cases were retrospectively evaluated. The results showed a decline in the use of a T-shaped incision in combination with subcutaneous mastectomy with periareolar tightening compared to an increase in the use of subcutaneous mastectomy in combination with liposuction. The excised tissue should always be sent for histological examination to make sure no malignant cells were present.

The Hall-Findlay mammaplasty pattern for skin-sparing mastectomy. Case report

We present an application of the Hall-Findlay mammaplasty skin pattern for skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). This is a simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty. Vertical reduction mammaplasty is the procedure advised for patients with moderator or large ptotic breasts, who wish to have a simultaneous contra-lateral breast reduction/mastopexy at the time of SSM for cancer or prophylactic mastectomy. It is particularly suitable for breast reconstruction with autologous tissue in the form of free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM), deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and extended latissimus dorsi (ELD) flaps.