Drug administration guides in dysphagia

Aim: The aim of this evaluation was to evaluate the use of Individualised Medication Administration Guides (IMAGs) for patients with dysphagia on one stroke ward over a 6month period. Background: Patients with dysphagia (PWD) are more likely to suffer an administration error than patients without swallowing difficulties. To both standardise and improve medicines administration to patients with dysphagia I-MAGs were introduced on one stroke ward over a 6 month period. Methods: A software package supported with data on current national guidelines on the administration of medicines to PWD was designed by a specialised pharmacist in dysphagia to enable him to create individualised medication administration guides for patients with dysphagia which stated how each medicine should be optimally prepared and administered. On completion of the pilot service a questionnaire was given to all nurses, pharmacist and speech and language therapists who had experienced the I-MAGs. All the professionals received the same questionnaire but questions relevant only to their practice were added to the nurse’s questionnaire. Results: Of 26 Healthcare professionals (HCPs) approached, 19 returned completed questionnaires. Higher variability was found in the 13 responses from the nurse respondents than in the ones from the 3 pharmacist and the 3 SALTs. 8 (61%) of the nurses felt more confident in their practice when I-MAGs were in place. 10 (76%) of the nurses admitted that the guides could sometimes increase the time of the administration, but saw that it made practice safer. All the pharmacists considered the recommendations in the guides useful and all the respondents with the exception of one nurse (12:13) would like this service to continue. Conclusion: I-MAGs were well received on the ward and they support individualised care for patients with dysphagia. But the guides needed additional pharmacist input and greater nursing time. Research to determine the cost effectiveness of I-MAGs is needed.

Novel methods of drug administration for the treatment and care of older patients

The number of older people globally is increasing, contributing to a growing burden of morbidity and mortality. With this shift in population demographic, comes a new challenge in terms of appropriate healthcare for the over 65 years age group. As medication is the principal therapeutic intervention, it is essential that it be fully optimised, to meet the needs of this heterogeneous population. The most common routes of drug administration are oral and injectable, which may display some limitations for older people, in cases of dysphagia or frailty for example. This review considers alternative methods of drug delivery to the norm, specifically discussing the nasal, pulmonary and transdermal routes, as well as novel orally disintegrating tablets. The changing physiology as ageing occurs must be considered in the development of novel drug delivery devices. This review considers the various aspects of ageing that will influence future drug formulation design and development.

Drug Administration: rules and regulations for health care practitioners

These narrated slides explain the roles, responsibilites and practicalities in administering drugs. Although it has been developed with student nurses and midwives in mind it will be of use to students of all health care professions.

Reversed phase HPLC determination of zidovudine in rat plasma and its pharmacokinetics after a single intranasal dose administration

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

SUFENTANIL INTRANASAL COME MEDICACAO PRE-ANESTESICA EM CRIANCAS

Background and objectives: Among the different routes used for the administration of preoperative medication, the intranasal route offers the advantage of a rapid systemic absorption as well as the avoidance of painful intramuscular and intravenous injections. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of sufentanil as a preoperative medication for the reduction of anxiety in pediatric patients in addition to its effects on the children's behaviour during the induction of anesthesia. Methods - Thirty patients whose ages ranged from 1 to 9 years old, physical status ASA 1, submitted to elective surgeries participated in the study and received sufentanil (2 μg.kg-1) by the intranasal route as preoperative medication. Using the modified Doughty index, the anxiety level was evaluated at 3 moments: To upon arrival of the child with parents: T5 and T10, five and ten minutes after the administration of the drug respectively. Behaviour during the induction of anesthesia was also evaluated. Induction of anesthesia was performed thiopental or ketamine. Results - The level of anxiety was not lower ten minutes after the administration of sufentanil and no improvement in the quality of the anesthetic induction was observed. Conclusions - Intranasal sufentanil in the doses used in this study did not prove to be efficient in the reduction of the anxiety level nor did it improve the quality of the induction of anesthesia when the period between the drug administration and separation from the parents was only ten minutes.

A comparative evaluation of open loop and closed loop drug administration strategies in the treatment of AIDS.

In recent years, many researchers in the field of biomedical sciences have made successful use of mathematical models to study, in a quantitative way, a multitude of phenomena such as those found in disease dynamics, control of physiological systems, optimization of drug therapy, economics of the preventive medicine and many other applications. The availability of good dynamic models have been providing means for simulation and design of novel control strategies in the context of biological events. This work concerns a particular model related to HIV infection dynamics which is used to allow a comparative evaluation of schemes for treatment of AIDS patients. The mathematical model adopted in this work was proposed by Nowak & Bangham, 1996 and describes the dynamics of viral concentration in terms of interaction with CD4 cells and the cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which are responsible for the defense of the organism. Two conceptually distinct techniques for drug therapy are analyzed: Open Loop Treatment, where a priori fixed dosage is prescribed and Closed Loop Treatment, where the doses are adjusted according to results obtained by laboratory analysis. Simulation results show that the Closed Loop Scheme can achieve improved quality of the treatment in terms of reduction in the viral load and quantity of administered drugs, but with the inconvenience related to the necessity of frequent and periodic laboratory analysis.

US Food and Drug Administration approval of generic versions of complex biologics: implications for the practicing physician using low molecular weight heparins

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have shown equivalent or superior efficacy and safety to unfractionated heparin as antithrombotic therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Each approved LMWH is a pleotropic biological agent with a unique chemical, biochemical, biophysical and biological profile and displays different pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. As a result, LMWHs are neither equipotent in preclinical assays nor equivalent in terms of their clinical efficacy and safety. Previously, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cautioned against using various LMWHs interchangeably, however recently, the FDA approved generic versions of LMWH that have not been tested in large clinical trials. This paper highlights the bio-chemical and pharmacological differences between the LMWH preparations that may result in different clinical outcomes, and also reviews the implications and challenges physicians face when generic versions of the original/innovator agents are approved for clinical use.