Cloud computing for healthcare research information sharing

With the widespread application of healthcare Information and Communication Technology (ICT), constructing a stable and sustainable data sharing circumstance has attracted rapidly growing attention in both academic research area and healthcare industry. Cloud computing is one of long dreamed visions of Healthcare Cloud (HC), which matches the need of healthcare information sharing directly to various health providers over the Internet, regardless of their location and the amount of data. In this paper, we discuss important research tool related to health information sharing and integration in HC and investigate the arising challenges and issues. We describe many potential solutions to provide more opportunities to implement EHR cloud. As well, we introduce the development of a HC related collaborative healthcare research example, thus illustrating the prospective of applying Cloud Computing in the health information science research.

Developing an intervention to equip nurses for acute life threatening events (ALTEs) in hospital:a phenomenological approach to healthcare research

Objectives: To understand staff's experiences of acute life threatening events (ALTEs) in a pediatric hospital setting. These data will inform an intervention to equip nurses with clinical and emotional skills for dealing with ALTEs. Method: A mixed design was used in the broader research program; this paper focuses on phenomenon-focused interviews analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Results: Emerging themes included staff's relationships with patients and the impact of personhood on their ability to perform competently in an emergency. More experienced nurses described "automatic" competence generated through increased exposure to ALTEs and were able to recognize "fumbling and shaking" as a normal stress response. Designating a role was significant to staff experience of effectiveness. Key to nurses' learning experience was reflection and identifying experiences as "teachable moments." Findings were considered alongside existing theories of self-efficacy, reflective thought, and advocacy inquiry to create an experiential learning intervention involving a series of clinical and role-related scenarios. Conclusion: The phenomenological work facilitated an in-depth reading of experience. It accentuated the importance of exposure to ALTEs giving nurses experiential knowledge to prepare them for the impact of these events. Challenges included bracketing the personhood of child patients, shifting focus to clinical tasks during the pressured demands of managing an ALTE, normalizing the physiological stress response, and the need for a forum and structure for reflection and learning. An intervention will be designed to provide experiential learning and encourage nurses to realize and benefit from their embodied knowledge.

Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting

Background: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), developed by Saaty in the late 1970s, is one of the methods for multi-criteria decision making. The AHP disaggregates a complex decision problem into different hierarchical levels. The weight for each criterion and alternative are judged in pairwise comparisons and priorities are calculated by the Eigenvector method. The slowly increasing application of the AHP was the motivation for this study to explore the current state of its methodology in the healthcare context. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted by searching the Pubmed and Web of Science databases for articles with the following keywords in their titles or abstracts: "Analytic Hierarchy Process," "Analytical Hierarchy Process," "multi-criteria decision analysis," "multiple criteria decision," "stated preference," and "pairwise comparison." In addition, we developed reporting criteria to indicate whether the authors reported important aspects and evaluated the resulting studies' reporting. Results: The systematic review resulted in 121 articles. The number of studies applying AHP has increased since 2005. Most studies were from Asia (almost 30 %), followed by the US (25.6 %). On average, the studies used 19.64 criteria throughout their hierarchical levels. Furthermore, we restricted a detailed analysis to those articles published within the last 5 years (n = 69). The mean of participants in these studies were 109, whereas we identified major differences in how the surveys were conducted. The evaluation of reporting showed that the mean of reported elements was about 6.75 out of 10. Thus, 12 out of 69 studies reported less than half of the criteria. Conclusion: The AHP has been applied inconsistently in healthcare research. A minority of studies described all the relevant aspects. Thus, the statements in this review may be biased, as they are restricted to the information available in the papers. Hence, further research is required to discover who should be interviewed and how, how inconsistent answers should be dealt with, and how the outcome and stability of the results should be presented. In addition, we need new insights to determine which target group can best handle the challenges of the AHP. © 2015 Schmidt et al.

General practitioners learning qualitative research: A case study of postgraduate education

Background Qualitative research is increasingly being recognised as a vital aspect of primary healthcare research. Teaching and learning how to conduct qualitative research is especially important for general practitioners and other clinicians in the professional educational setting. This article examines a case study of postgraduate professional education in qualitative research for clinicians, for the purpose of enabling a robust discussion around teaching and learning in medicine and the health sciences. Method A series of three workshops was delivered for primary healthcare academics. The workshops were evaluated using a quantitative survey and qualitative free-text responses to enable descriptive analyses. Results Participants found qualitative philosophy and theory the most difficult areas to engage with, and learning qualitative coding and analysis was considered the easiest to learn. Discussion Key elements for successful teaching were identified, including the use of adult learning principles, the value of an experienced facilitator and an awareness of the impact of clinical subcultures on learning.

Self-reported access to and quality of healthcare for diabetes : Do the severely obese experience equal access?

Background: Given reported pejorative views that health professionals have about patients who are severely obese, we examined the self-reported views of the quality and availability of diabetes care from the perspective of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), stratified by body mass index (BMI). Methods: 1795 respondents to the Diabetes MILES - Australia national survey had T2DM. Of these, 530 (30%) were severely obese (BMI ≥35 kg/m2) and these participants were matched with 530 controls (BMI <35 kg/m2). Data regarding participants' self-reported interactions with health practitioners and services were compared. Results: Over 70% of participants reported that their general practitioner was the professional they relied on most for diabetes care. There were no betweengroup differences in patient-reported availability of health services, quality of interaction with health practitioners, resources and support for selfmanagement, or access to almost all diabetes services. Discussion: Participants who were severely obese did not generally report greater difficulty in accessing diabetes care.

Considering the ways in which anti-oppressive practice principles can inform health research

All research that investigates therapeutic practice should be conducted with the aim to develop and support good procedures of inquiry. An anti-oppressive practice approach within health research provides a way to systematically examine research procedures and motivations to increase the potential that the resultant research will yield ethical and just results. In this paper two music therapy researchers consider how anti-oppressive practices can address real life problems and be applicable to real life situations; from questions of participation, to developing the research question, recruitment, consent, and further steps of the research process. The goal of this paper is to examine issues arising when considering anti-oppressive practices and healthcare research practices from the perspective of the authors’ experience of music therapy research.

Can we do better? Researchers' experiences with ethical review boards on projects with later life as a focus

The goal of this study was to describe researchers' experiences in submitting ethical proposals focused on older adult populations, including studies with persons with dementia, to ethical review boards. Ethical approval was granted for an online survey. Researchers were recruited via listservs and snowballing techniques. Participants included 157 persons (73% female) from Australia and the United States, with a mean age of 46 (±13). Six main issues were encountered by researchers who participated in this survey. In descending order, these included questions regarding: informed consent and information requirements (61.1%), participants' vulnerability, particularly for those with cognitive impairments (58.6%), participant burden (44.6%), data access (29.3%), adverse effects of data collection/intervention (26.8%), and study methodology (25.5%). An inductive content analysis of responses revealed a range of encounters with ethical review panels spanning positive, negative, and neutral experiences. Concerns voiced about ethical review boards included committees being overly focused on legal risk, as well as not always hearing the voice of older research participants, both potential and actual. Respondents noted inability to move forward on studies, as well as loss of researchers and participant groups from gerontological and clinical research as a result of negative interactions with ethics committees. Positive interactions with the committees reinforced researchers' need to carefully construct their research approaches with persons with dementia in particular. Suggested guidelines for committees when dealing with ethics applications involving older adults include self-reflecting on potential biases and stereotypes, and seeking further clarification and information from gerontological researchers before arriving at decisions.

Iniciativas internacionais de segurança do paciente: contribuições para o refinamento dos sistemas de proteção

Trata-se da temática Segurança do Paciente, que teve como objeto as iniciativas sobre segurança do paciente estabelecidas por organizações internacionais de segurança. O objetivo proposto pelo estudo foi analisar tais iniciativas estabelecidas por organizações internacionais de segurança. Para compor este estudo identificaram-se as principais organizações de segurança, atarvés de uma revisão bibliográfica de literatura realizada com base em fontes eletrônicas primárias, considerando-se as organizações pioneiras na abordagem do tema Segurança do Paciente que fomentam prioritariamente a segurança do paciente e que divulgaram amplamente esta temática no período de 2002 a 2012. Foram encontradas na plataforma Google referências a mais de 100 instituições no mundo que abordam este tema. No entanto somente sete atenderam a todos os critérios de seleção, havendo predomínio de organizações americanas (seis). A organização mais antiga é o Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1946), e a mais recente é a World Alliance for Patient Safety (2004). Quanto à natureza jurídica, duas são governamentais (CDC e AHRQ), quatro são não governamentais (The Joint Commission, IHI, WHO Alliance e ISMP) e uma organização independente (NCCMERP). Totalizaram-se 103 iniciativas de segurança do paciente no contexto hospitalar. A organização que mais publicou iniciativas para a segurança do paciente no contexto hospitalar foi o ISMP com 20 iniciativas, totalizando 19% das iniciativas exploradas. As iniciativas relacionadas à terapia medicamentosa, higienização das mãos, controle de infecções e cirurgias seguras foram as mais abordadas. Conclui-se que ao atentar para as iniciativas internacionais de Segurança do Paciente o profissional de saúde poderá contextualizar-se, aprimorando seu conhecimento técnico científico, além de pôr em prática o que as principais organizações mundiais voltadas para a Segurança do Paciente preconizam para a realização de um cuidado mais seguro.

Variation in pediatric traumatic brain injury outcomes in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the degree of variation, by state of hospitalization, in outcomes associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a pediatric population. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients admitted to a hospital with a TBI. SETTING: Hospitals from states in the United States that voluntarily participate in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric (age ≤ 19 y) patients hospitalized for TBI (N=71,476) in the United States during 2001, 2004, 2007, and 2010. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was proportion of patients discharged to rehabilitation after an acute care hospitalization among alive discharges. The secondary outcome was inpatient mortality. RESULTS: The relative risk of discharge to inpatient rehabilitation varied by as much as 3-fold among the states, and the relative risk of inpatient mortality varied by as much as nearly 2-fold. In the United States, approximately 1981 patients could be discharged to inpatient rehabilitation care if the observed variation in outcomes was eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant variation between states in both rehabilitation discharge and inpatient mortality after adjusting for variables known to affect each outcome. Future efforts should be focused on identifying the cause of this state-to-state variation, its relationship to patient outcome, and standardizing treatment across the United States.

Pain in care home residents with dementia: an exploration of frequency, prescribing and relatives' perspectives

Objectives: This study aims to determine pain frequency amongst care home residents with dementia, to investigate variables associated with pain, to explore analgesic use among residents and to seek residents' relatives' views on provision of care and management of pain by the care home. Methods: Structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with residents, nursing staff and relatives from nine dementia care homes in Northern Ireland, between May 2010 and March 2012. Demographic information was collected from participants, neuropsychiatric tests were used to assess residents' cognitive functioning, medication use was determined from care home records and residents' pain was assessed using a verbal descriptor scale. Relatives' views were sought on care provision and management of pain. Results: Forty-two residents, 16 nurses/care assistants and 35 relatives participated; the participation rate of residents was low (27.6%). Most residents were suffering moderate-severe dementia, and some residents (26.2%) were unable to provide a self-report of pain. A significantly higher proportion of relatives (57.1%) deemed residents to be experiencing pain at the time of the interview, compared with residents (23.8%, p = 0.005) and nurses/care assistants (42.9%, p = 0.035). Most residents (88.1%) were prescribed with analgesia; non-opioid analgesics were most commonly prescribed. High proportions of residents were prescribed with psychoactive medications. Antipsychotic drug use was associated with presence of pain (p = 0.046). Conclusions: This study has reinforced the challenge of assessing and managing pain in this resident population and highlighted issues to be addressed by long-term care providers and clinicians. Participation of people with dementia, and their families, in healthcare research needs to be improved.

Tools for Assessing Outcomes in Studies of Chronic Cough: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the 2006 American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) cough guidelines, a variety of tools has been developed or further refined for assessing cough. The purpose of the present committee was to evaluate instruments used by investigators performing clinical research on chronic cough. The specific aims were to (1) assess the performance of tools designed to measure cough frequency, severity, and impact in adults, adolescents, and children with chronic cough and (2) make recommendations or suggestions related to these findings.

METHODS: By following the CHEST methodologic guidelines, the CHEST Expert Cough Panel based its recommendations and suggestions on a recently published comparative effectiveness review commissioned by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, a corresponding summary published in CHEST, and an updated systematic review through November 2013. Recommendations or suggestions based on these data were discussed, graded, and voted on during a meeting of the Expert Cough Panel.

RESULTS: We recommend for adults, adolescents (≥ 14 years of age), and children complaining of chronic cough that validated and reliable health-related quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires be used as the measurement of choice to assess the impact of cough, such as the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and the Cough-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire in adult and adolescent patients and the Parent Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire in children. We recommend acoustic cough counting to assess cough frequency but not cough severity. Limited data exist regarding the performance of visual analog scales, numeric rating scales, and tussigenic challenges.

CONCLUSIONS: Validated and reliable cough-specific health-related QoL questionnaires are recommended as the measurement of choice to assess the impact of cough on patients. How they compare is yet to be determined. When used, the reporting of cough severity by visual analog or numeric rating scales should be standardized. Previously validated QoL questionnaires or other cough assessments should not be modified unless the new version has been shown to be reliable and valid. Finally, in research settings, tussigenic challenges play a role in understanding mechanisms of cough.

La nanosanté : perspective et enjeux sociologiques de l'application des nanotechnologies à la médecine.

Considérée comme le futur de la pratique médicale, la nanomédecine est l’application des nanotechnologies aux soins de santé. Plus qu’un nouveau domaine d’application technologique, la nanomédecine est porteuse d’un nouveau paradigme biomédical qui promeut une conception technoscientifique de la santé. Ce nouveau paradigme regroupe sous le préfixe nano l’ensemble des grandes tendances actuelles de la recherche en santé : la médecine prédictive, la médecine personnalisée et la médecine régénératrice. Centré sur le développement d’innovations visant au contrôle technique des éléments et des processus biologiques fondamentaux, ce nouveau paradigme se développe largement grâce au soutien des gouvernements et aux promesses économiques qu’il soulève. Il se construit à la croisée du scientifique, du politique et de l’économique. Interroger la nanomédecine revient alors à examiner plus largement la forme et les conditions du sens des innovations biomédicales et à soulever les implications de la « technoscientifisation » des soins de santé. L’objectif de cette thèse est de rendre compte de la spécificité et des enjeux sociaux, culturels et politico-économiques caractéristiques du modèle biomédical technoscientifique porté par la nanomédecine à partir de sa conceptualisation sous la forme d’un idéaltype : la nanosanté. Si la nanomédecine renvoie de manière générale aux applications techniques de la nanotechnologie au domaine biomédical, la nanosanté renvoie aux diverses dimensions sociologiques constitutives de ces technologies et à leurs effets sur la santé et la société. Notre modèle de la nanosanté s’organise autour de trois dimensions : la transversalité, l’amélioration et la globalisation. Compte tenu de sa nature synthétique, ce modèle tridimensionnel permet iii d’aborder de front plusieurs questionnements cruciaux soulevés par le développement de la nanomédecine. Il permet d’éclairer le rapport contemporain à la santé et ses implications sur l’identité ; de mettre en lumière la centralité des technosciences dans la conception du progrès médical et social ; de mieux saisir les nouvelles formes globales de pouvoir sur la vie et les nouvelles formes d’inégalité et d’exploitation caractéristiques d’une société qui accorde une valeur grandissante à l’adaptabilité technique de l’humain et à l’économisation de la santé et du corps ; mais aussi de mieux comprendre le sens et les répercussions de l’engagement scientifique, politique et économique dans les innovations moléculaires et cellulaires.

Búsqueda de caso y diagnóstico temprano en sujetos con sospecha de la EPOC

La enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica es una patología comúnmente sub-diagnosticada. A la fecha no existe ninguna revisión sistemática publicada que evalué la búsqueda de caso (sujetos mayores de 40 años con factores de riesgo sin síntomas) y el diagnóstico temprano (factor de riesgo y síntomas) de la enfermedad. Métodos: Se condujo una revisión sistemática en tres bases de datos (Pubmed, CINAHL, EMBASE) para identificar estudios observacionales que reportaran la prevalencia de la EPOC en diferentes poblaciones expuestas a factores de riesgo (búsqueda de caso) o con factores de riesgo y síntomas (diagnóstico temprano), posteriormente con dichos estudios se calculó una prevalencia ponderada para cada grupo y esta se comparó con la prevalencia reportada en la población general en estudios locales. Así mismo se identificaron estudios para determinar la precisión de estrategias de búsqueda de caso (cuestionarios y el pico flujo espiratorio portátil PiKo 6®) usando la espirometría como patrón de oro para el diagnóstico de la EPOC. Dos autores seleccionaron de forma independiente los estudios que cumplían con los criterios de inclusión y exclusión y se evaluó la calidad metodológica por medio de la estrategia GRADE. El número necesario a tamizar (1/ prevalencia) para diagnosticar un caso de EPOC con espirometría fue calculado para los dos grupos de interés y comparado con el valor conocido de la prevalencia nacional. A los cuestionarios y estudios de Piko 6® se les evaluó las características operativas (VPP, VPN) y se calcularon las probabilidades pos test negativas y positivas teniendo en cuenta la prevalencia ponderada. Resultados Para la estrategia de búsqueda de caso, once estudios cumplieron los criterios de inclusión y la prevalencia ponderada en este grupo fue de 22% con un número necesario a tamizar (NNS) con espirometría de 5, comparado con un NNS de 11 obtenido de la prevalencia de la EPOC en Colombia 8.9% ( IC 95% 8.2-9.7). Posterior a la evaluación critica de varios cuestionarios y estudios de piko 6®, seleccionamos el cuestionario desarrollado por Mullernová y cols y el estudio de Frith y cols respectivamente. El cuestionario validado mostro una probabilidad postest positiva del 56% y postest negativa del 3% con un NNS de 2; para piko 6® los valores correspondientes fueron de 44%, 7% y 2 respectivamente. Para el diagnóstico temprano la prevalencia ponderada fue del 33.9% con un NNS de 3. Conclusiones El número necesario a tamizar para la estrategia de búsqueda de caso con cuestionarios y piko 6® es substancialmente menor que el número necesario a tamizar en la población general. El uso de cuestionarios o de piko 6® disminuye a 2 el NNS en el grupo de búsqueda de caso y a 3 para el grupo de diagnóstico temprano.