How I Got Pregnant

Travail créatif / Creative Work

Complicaciones postoperatorias tempranas de la colporrafia anterior por técnica tradicional versus técnica de sitio específico

El prolapso del piso pélvico es una entidad frecuente, especialmente en pacientes postmenopáusicas y en su gran mayoría requiere tratamiento quirúrgico. En este estudio comparamos la aparición de complicaciones postoperatorias tempranas entre la colporrafia anterior con técnica clásica (TC) versus la colporrafia anterior con técnica de sitio especifico (CSE). Se realizó un estudio observacional analítico, retrospectivo, de dos cohortes de pacientes que requirieron colporrafia anterior entre agosto de 2009 hasta junio de 2012. Las características de cada grupo fueron homogéneas y comparables. El desenlace de mayor frecuencia fue dehiscencia de la línea de sutura, sin embargo, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las dos técnicas. La aparición de reprolapso temprano y el diagnóstico de abscesos o hematomas presentaron frecuencias que carecen de diferencia significativa. No hubo complicaciones tempranas graves tales como sangrado intraoperatoria mayor o lesiones vesicouretrales. Los resultados sugieren que las dos técnicas tienen una incidencia baja de complicaciones postoperatorias tempranas y por lo tanto parecen ser seguros dentro del manejo quirúrgico del prolapso del componente anterior del piso pélvico.

Infecciones urinarias en gestantes y adherencia a guía de manejo en primer nivel – Colmedica. Bogotá D.C., 2007

Las Infecciones Urinarias son causa de frecuente morbilidad, afecta a amplios sectores de la población, conllevan la utilización de antibióticos, afectan más a las mujeres, siendo un significativo problema de salud debido a su incidencia durante el embarazo que es del l0%1, diagnosticándose en la primera visita del control prenatal. Aproximadamente el 15% de las mujeres, tendrán una infección urinaria en alguna época durante su vida, con riesgos a largo plazo y calidad de vida. Amerita la detección temprana, el tratamiento oportuno y eficaz, el estudio y seguimiento posteriores.

Representaciones sociales de la medicina complementaria y alternativa (MCA) para el cáncer en estudiantes universitarios de carreras de ciencias de la salud

Se realizó un estudio cualitativo exploratorio con estudiantes de carreras de Ciencias de la Salud con el objetivo de comprender las representaciones sociales que tienen acerca de la Medicina Complementaria y Alternativa (MCA) para el cáncer. Se desarrollaron grupos focales y la información obtenida fue analizada a través del Análisis Temático e interpretada con base en la Teoría de las Representaciones Sociales. Se encontraron diversas representaciones sociales asociadas con la definición, los objetivos, los tratamientos, la eficacia, las fuentes de información y el origen de la MCA. En conclusión se evidenció una alta tendencia a la aceptación y a la manifestación de una actitud positiva, aunque ambivalente frente a la MCA, además de un desconocimiento por la diferenciación conceptual entre este tipo de Medicina y la Medicina Popular. La cultura y las creencias sociales predominan en las representaciones sociales que tienen los estudiantes de la MCA para el cáncer, pese a su formación académica.

Health beliefs and attitudes of HPV among Hispanic parents as predictors of intention to use the HPV vaccine

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted disease in the United States. Although HPV prevalence is high in the United States, there are a limited number of research studies that focus on Hispanics, who have higher incidence rates of cervical cancer than their non-Hispanic counterparts. The HPV vaccine introduced in 2006 may offer a feasible solution to the issues surrounding high prevalence of HPV. Due to the high prevalence of HPV infection among adolescents and young adults it has been suggested that HPV vaccination begin prior to onset sexual activity and focus on non-sexually active adolescents and pre-adolescents. Consequently, it has become increasingly important to assess knowledge and awareness of HPV in order to develop effective intervention strategies. This pilot study evaluated the knowledge and health beliefs of Hispanic parents regarding HPV and the HPV vaccine using a newly developed questionnaire based on the constructs of the Health Belief Model. The sample was recruited from an ob-gyn office in El Paso, Texas. Descriptive data show that the majority of the sample was female (94.1%), Hispanic (76.5%), Catholic (64.7%), and had at least a high school education (55.9%). Chi-square analysis revealed that the following variables differed amongst parents who intended to vaccinate their child against HPV and those who did not: religion (p=0.038), perceived severity item "HPV infections are easily treated" (p=0.052), perceived benefits item "It is better to vaccinate a child against an STI before they become sexually active" (p=0.014) and perceived barriers item "The HPV vaccine may have serious side effects that could harm my child" (p=0.004). Univariate logistic regression indicated that religion (OR = 4.8, CI: 1.04, 21.8) and "The HPV vaccine may have serious side effects that could harm my child" (OR = 15.9, CI: 1.73, 145.8) were significant predictors of parental intention to vaccinate. Multivariate logistic regression, using backwards elimination, indicated that religion (OR = 7.7, CI: 1.25, 47.8) and "The HPV vaccine may have serious side effects that may harm my child" (OR = 7.6, CI: 1.15, 50.2) were the best predictive variables for parental intention to vaccinate. ^

Planning, implementation, and evaluation of an HIV -screening program for pregnant women

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an HIV-screening program at a private health-care institution where the providers were trained to counsel pregnant women about the HIV-antibody test according to the latest recommendations made by the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) and the Texas legislature. A before-and-after study design was selected for the study. The participants were OB/GYN nurses who attended an educational program and the patients they counseled about the HIV test. Training improved the nurses' overall knowledge about the content of the program and nurses were more likely to offer the HIV test to all pregnant women regardless of their risk of infection. Still, contrary to what was predicted, the nurses did not give more information to increase the knowledge pregnant women had about HIV infection, transmission, and available treatments. Consequently, many women were not given the chance to correctly assess their risk during the counseling session and there was no evidence that knowledge would reduce the propensity of many women to deny being at risk for HIV. On the other hand, pregnant women who received prenatal care after the implementation of the HIV-screening program were more likely to be tested than women who received prenatal care before its implementation (96% vs. 48%); in turn, the likelihood that more high-risk women would be tested for HIV also increased (94% vs. 60%). There was no evidence that mandatory testing with right of refusal would deter women from being tested for HIV. When the moment comes for a woman to make her decision, other concerns are more important to her than whether the option to be tested is mandatory or not. The majority of pregnant women indicated that their main reasons for being tested were: (a) the recommendation of their health-care provider; and (b) concern about the risks to their babies. Recommending that all pregnant women be tested regardless of their risk of infection, together with making the HIV test readily available to all women, are probably the two best ways of increasing the patients' participation in an HIV-screening program for pregnant women. ^

Guide to deliveries in Illinois hospitals /

Gynecological hospitalizations report will be published later.