Simplified curve and switch work; a collection of valuable points for the supervisor and foreman and for college instruction,

Mode of access: Internet.

The mine foreman's handbook of practical and theoretical information on the opening, ventilating, and working of collieries /

Mode of access: Internet.

A questionnaire study of foreman job responsibilities.

Cover title.

The railway foreman and his job, especially prepared for the education and training of railway foremen by the staff of the American Technical Society in cooperation with a group of railway executives.

Mode of access: Internet.

Front line cost administration; a factual approach to industrial engineering methods which explain and promote the use of cost administration tactics to the front line administrator, the foreman.

Mode of access: Internet.

How to prepare a foreman's policy manual,

On spine: Policy manual.

Closure of the Challinor Centre II: An extended report on 95 individuals after 12 months of community living

As part of an institutional closure programme, 95 individuals with an intellectual disability were relocated to community-based group homes. Each individual was assessed 6 months prior to the relocation and then again after 1, 6, and 12 months of community living. Assessments involved ratings of adaptive and maladaptive behaviour, choice-making, and life circumstances. The group means comparing institution to community ratings showed improvements in adaptive functioning but no significant change in maladaptive behaviour. There were also improvements in life circumstances and increased opportunities for choice-making following relocation to the community. These outcomes suggest that relocation to the community was associated with a more active and normalised lifestyle than experienced in the institutional setting.

Development of a fuzzy qualitative risk assessment model applied to construction industry

Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Doutor em Engenharia Industrial

Light receptor action is critical for maintaining plant biomass at warm ambient temperatures.

The ability to withstand environmental temperature variation is essential for plant survival. Former studies in Arabidopsis revealed that light signalling pathways had a potentially unique role in shielding plant growth and development from seasonal and daily fluctuations in temperature. In this paper we describe the molecular circuitry through which the light receptors cry1 and phyB buffer the impact of warm ambient temperatures. We show that the light signalling component HFR1 acts to minimise the potentially devastating effects of elevated temperature on plant physiology. Light is known to stabilise levels of HFR1 protein by suppressing proteasome-mediated destruction of HFR1. We demonstrate that light-dependent accumulation and activity of HFR1 are highly temperature dependent. The increased potency of HFR1 at warmer temperatures provides an important restraint on PIF4 that drives elongation growth. We show that warm ambient temperatures promote the accumulation of phosphorylated PIF4. However, repression of PIF4 activity by phyB and cry1 (via HFR1) is critical for controlling growth and maintaining physiology as temperatures rise. Loss of this light-mediated restraint has severe consequences for adult plants which have greatly reduced biomass.

The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the neuromodulation appropriateness consensus committee.

INTRODUCTION: The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) of the International Neuromodulation Society (INS) evaluated evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of neurostimulation to treat chronic pain, chronic critical limb ischemia, and refractory angina and recommended appropriate clinical applications. METHODS: The NACC used literature reviews, expert opinion, clinical experience, and individual research. Authors consulted the Practice Parameters for the Use of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain (2006), systematic reviews (1984 to 2013), and prospective and randomized controlled trials (2005 to 2013) identified through PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Neurostimulation is relatively safe because of its minimally invasive and reversible characteristics. Comparison with medical management is difficult, as patients considered for neurostimulation have failed conservative management. Unlike alternative therapies, neurostimulation is not associated with medication-related side effects and has enduring effect. Device-related complications are not uncommon; however, the incidence is becoming less frequent as technology progresses and surgical skills improve. Randomized controlled studies support the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in treating failed back surgery syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome. Similar studies of neurostimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain, postamputation pain, postherpetic neuralgia, and other causes of nerve injury are needed. International guidelines recommend spinal cord stimulation to treat refractory angina; other indications, such as congestive heart failure, are being investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate neurostimulation is safe and effective in some chronic pain conditions. Technological refinements and clinical evidence will continue to expand its use. The NACC seeks to facilitate the efficacy and safety of neurostimulation.

The appropriate use of neurostimulation: avoidance and treatment of complications of neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of chronic pain.

INTRODUCTION: The International Neuromodulation Society (INS) has determined that there is a need for guidance regarding safety and risk reduction for implantable neurostimulation devices. The INS convened an international committee of experts in the field to explore the evidence and clinical experience regarding safety, risks, and steps to risk reduction to improve outcomes. METHODS: The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) reviewed the world literature in English by searching MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar to evaluate the evidence for ways to reduce risks of neurostimulation therapies. This evidence, obtained from the relevant literature, and clinical experience obtained from the convened consensus panel were used to make final recommendations on improving safety and reducing risks. RESULTS: The NACC determined that the ability to reduce risk associated with the use of neurostimulation devices is a valuable goal and possible with best practice. The NACC has recommended several practice modifications that will lead to improved care. The NACC also sets out the minimum training standards necessary to become an implanting physician. CONCLUSIONS: The NACC has identified the possibility of improving patient care and safety through practice modification. We recommend that all implanting physicians review this guidance and consider adapting their practice accordingly.

Mechanism of HFR1 function in adaptive growth responses in "Arabidopsis thaliana"

AbstractPlants are sessile organisms, which have evolved an astonishing ability to sense changes in their environment. Depending on the surrounding conditions, such as changes in light and temperature, plants modulate the activity of important transcriptional regulators. The shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) is one important mechanism for shade-intolerant plants to adapt their growth in high vegetative density. In shaded conditions plants sense a diminished red/far-red ratio via the phytochrome system and respond with morphological changes such as elongation growth of stems and petioles. The Phytochrome Interacting Factors 4 and 5 (PIF4 and PIF5) are positive regulators of the SAS and required for a full response (Lorrain et al, 2008). They regulate the SAS by inducing the expression of shade avoidance marker genes such as PIL1, ATHB2, XTR7 and HFR1 (Hornitschek et al, 2009; Lorrain et al, 2008).I investigated the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of the SAS by HFR1 (long Hypocotyl in FR light). Although HFR1 is a PIF-related bHLH transcription factor, we discovered that HFR1 is a non-DNA binding protein. Moreover, we revealed that HFR1 inhibits an exaggerated SAS by forming non-DNA binding heterodimers with PIF4 and PIF5 (Hornitschek et al, 2009). This negative feedback loop is an important mechanism to limit elongation growth also in elevated temperatures. HFR1 accumulation and activity are highly temperature-dependent and the increased activity of HFR1 at warmer temperatures also provides an important restraint on PIF4-driven elongation growth (Foreman et al, 2011).Finally we performed a genome-wide analysis to determine how PIF4 and PIF5 regulate growth in response to shade. We identified potential PIF5- target genes, which represent many well-known shade-responsive genes. Our analysis of gene expression also revealed a role of PIF4 and PIF5 in simulated sun possibly via the regulation of auxin sensitivity.RésuméLes plantes sont des organismes sessiles ayant développé une capacité surprenante à détecter des changements dans leur environnement. En fonction des conditions extérieures, telles que les variations de lumière ou de température, elles adaptent l'activité d'importants régulateurs transcriptionnels. Le syndrome d'évitement de l'ombre (SAS), est un mécanisme important pour les plantes intolérantes à l'ombre leur permettant d'adapter leur croissance lorsqu'elles se développent dans des conditions de végétations très denses. Dans ces conditions, les plantes détectent une réduction de la quantité relative de lumière rouge par rapport à la lumière rouge-lointain (rapport R/FR). Ce changement, perçu via le système des phytochromes, induit des modifications morphologiques telle qu'une élongation des tiges et des pétioles. Les protéines PIF4 et PIF5 (Phytochrome Interacting Factors) sont des régulateurs positifs du SAS et sont nécessaires pour une réponse complète (Lorrain et al, 2008). Ces facteurs de transcription régulent le SAS en induisant l'expression de gènes marqueurs de cette réponse tels que PIL1, ATHB2, XTR7 et HFR1 (Hornitschek et al, 2009; Lorrain et al, 2008).J'ai étudié les mécanismes moléculaires sous-jacents à la régulation du SAS par HFR1 (long Hypocotyl in FR light). HFR1 est un facteur de transcription type bHLH de la famille des PIF, quoique nous ayons découvert que HFR1 est une protéine ne se liant pas à Γ ADN. Nous avons montré que HFR1 inhibe un SAS exagéré en formant des heterodimères avec PIF4 et PIF5 (Hornitschek et al, 2009). Nous avons également montré que cette boucle de régulation négative est également un mécanisme important pour limiter la croissance de l'élongation dans des conditions de fortes températures. De plus l'accumulation et l'activité de HFR1 augmentent avec la température ce qui permet d'inhiber plus fortement l'effet activateur de PIF4 sur la croissance.Enfin, nous avons effectué une analyse génomique à large échelle afin de déterminer comment PIF4 et PIF5 régulent la croissance en réponse à l'ombre. Nous avons identifié les gènes cibles potentiels de PIF5, correspondant en partie à des gènes connus dans la réponse de l'évitement de l'ombre. Notre analyse de l'expression des gènes a également révélé un rôle important de PIF4 et PIF5 dans des conditions de croissance en plein soleil, probablement via la régulation de la sensibilité à l'auxine.