Executive Power and the People: Does the President Care What You Think?

I sought to examine the relationship between public approval of the president and his subsequent behavior. Specifically, I looked at the relationship between public approval and signing statement usage along with their usage following the 2006 outcry against President Bush's use of them.

Strengthening executive-legislative consultation on foreign policy.

Item 1017-A, 1017-B (microfiche)

Veto power of president. Hearing before the Committee on the judiciary, House of Representatives. Sixty-third Congress, first session, on H.J. res. 15. September 9, 1913.

Includes list of revenue and appropriation bills vetoed by presidents of the United States, list of states in which veto power is not vested in the governor, etc., etc.

Statement by Herbert Brownell, Jr., attorney general of the United States before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on S. J. Res. 1 (83d Cong.) a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to the making of treaties and executive agreements, and S. J. Res. 43 (83d Cong.) a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to the legal effect of certain treaties.

Mode of access: Internet.

Speech of Mr. Barton, of Missouri, upon the power of the President to remove federal officers : and upon the restraining power and duty of the Senate over an abusive exercise of that power : and in reply to the arguments of several members of the majority.

At head of caption title: In the Senate of the United States, March 17, 1830. Executive session.

Speech on executive powers, delivered in the House of Representatives, Dec. 19, 1837.

Caption title.

Second speech of Robert Wickliffe, Jr. (of Fayette,) on the veto power : delivered in committee of the whole of the House of Representatives, January, 1842.

Mode of access: Internet.

Law and the executive in Britain : a comparative study /

Bibliographical footnotes.

The independence of the Executive,

First published 1900.

Relationship between Congress and the Executive in the formulation and implementation of foreign policy : hearings before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session.

Vol. called part 1, but no further parts.

Resenha de estudos sobre o executivo

Este artigo ?? uma resenha da literatura sobre o Executivo que discute o impacto dos sistemas parlamentarista e presidencialista na capacidade governamental de formular e implementar pol??ticas p??blicas. Ao longo do texto, busca-se identificar fatores que permitem ou bloqueiam o exerc??cio de uma fun????o coordenadora e unificadora de a????es, analisando a rela????o entre os poderes Executivo e Legislativo, a estrutura do poder Executivo e as rela????es entre o Executivo pol??tico e a burocracia. Os estudos sobre parlamentarismo enfocam: import??ncia dos partidos, papel dos ministros, extens??o do poder do primeiro ministro e papel coletivo do gabinete. J?? os trabalhos sobre presidencialismo v??o de pesquisas sobre o Congresso norte-americano, envolvendo infer??ncias estat??sticas e an??lises baseadas na teoria institucional a estudos de caso sobre a American Politics (presid??ncia e lideran??a). Apesar das diferen??as entre parlamentarismo e presidencialismo, a literatura indica que mecanismos institucionais de controle de agenda produzem os mesmos efeitos nos dois sistemas.

"Fugindo do perigo": a pol??tica de reforma administrativa na Argentina de Menem

O presente artigo analisa a pol??tica de reforma administrativa durante os primeiros anos da administra????o Menem, tendo como pano de fundo as medidas de ajuste defendidas pelas institui????es financeiras internacionais em busca da estabiliza????o econ??mica e da reforma do aparelho estatal. Enfoca particularmente a administra????o central do Poder Executivo constitu??da pelos minist??rios e seus ??rg??os descentralizados. Os autores abordam ao lado das medidas concretas adotadas, o jogo pol??tico entre os v??rios atores envolvidos, destacando a hipertrofia da a????o do Executivo como uma das caracter??sticas fundamentais da reforma argentina.

Three essays in Swiss corporate governance

This dissertation is a combination of three relatively independent chapters on the subject of corporate governance. Corporate governance is presently at the epicenter of the global financial crisis. The lack of regulation and the misalignment of objectives have greatly contributed to the major crisis we are now in. Most governance research has been conducted in the United States in a context of widely held corporations and great executive power. It does not reflect the variety of situations around the world and we question the validity of this model in other contexts. The aim of this dissertation is to look at other governance models, in particular the Swiss corporate governance not only from a practical point of view, but also from a multi-theoretical approach. Traditional corporate governance literature has focused on the Anglo-American model that mainly follows the agency theory (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) in a shareholder-manager context, and overlooked other approaches. We focus on three different aspects of corporate governance using three different theories. First, we look at the ownership type of various corporations, using the agency theory in a context where issues between shareholders predominate over the typical shareholder-manager relationship. Second, we explore the adoption process of several governance mechanisms that, due to changes in legislation, has taken place in Switzerland since 2002. We use the institutional theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983), in a context where the environmental pressures are particularly high. Finally, we spotlight the board of directors as a key element of the governance of publicly listed corporations. Particularly, we focus on the independence of the board of directors, using a combination of the agency and resource dependence theories (Pfeffer, 1972; Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978).

Political mobilisation and models of trade unionism : Southern Europe in comparative perspective

The relationship between union membership and political mobilization has been studied under many perspectives, but quantitative cross-national analyses have been hampered by the absence of international comparable survey data until the first round of the European Social Survey (ESS-2002) was made available. Using different national samples from this survey in four moments of time (2002, 2004 and 2006), our paper provides evidence of cross-country divergence in the empirical association between political mobilisation and trade union membership. Cross-national differences in union members’ political mobilization, we argue, can be explained by the existence of models of unionism that in turn differ with respect to two decisive factors: the institutionalisation of trade union activity and the opportunities left-wing parties have available for gaining access to executive power.