Expedited Ethics Review Form for Student Projects

Form to be completed and discussed with your tutor for submission to the ethics committee as appropriate

Multisite Research Ethics Review: Problems and Potential Solutions

Article

Report of the First Meeting of the Review Committee of the Caribbean Development and Co-operation Committee (CDCC)

Contiene el informe y las recomendaciones de la primera reunion del Comite Examinador del CDCC, encargado de evaluar, valorar y redefinir los programas y prioridades del CDCC.

Informe de la Segunda Reunión del Comité Examinador del Comité de Desarrollo y Cooperación del Caribe (CDCC), Puerto España, 20 febrero 1986 = Report of the Second Meeting of the Review Committee of the Caribbean Development and Co-operation Committee (CDCC), Port-of-Spain, 20 February 1986 = Rapport de la Deuxième Réunion du Comité d'Examen du CDCC, Port-of-Spain, 20 février 1986

Informe de la reunion que tuvo por objetivo principal examinar las actividades de los organismos especializados y otros organos en relacion con el programa de trabajo del CDCC en lo que concierne a la coordinacion del programa.

Preliminary report of the Scientific Assessment and Strategy Team : report of the Interagency Floodplain Management Review Committee to the Administration Floodplain Management Task Force.

S/N 040-000-00650-8 (GPO)

Sharing the challenge : floodplain management into the 21st century : report of the Interagency Floodplain Management Review Committee to the Administration Floodplain Management Task Force.

Mode of access: Internet.

Current report re Report of the Special Review Committee of the Board of Directors of Gulf Oil Corporation : pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Property tax review & analysis requested by House Tax Policy Review Committee

This Powerpoint presentation gives statistics on property taxes throughout the state.

Does research into sensitive areas do harm? Experiences of research participation after a child’s diagnosis with Ewing’s Sarcoma

Objective: To investigate family members’ experiences of involvement in a previous study (conducted August 1995 to June 1997) following their child’s diagnosis with Ewing’s sarcoma. Design: Retrospective survey, conducted between 1 November and 30 November 1997, using a postal questionnaire. Participants: Eighty-one of 97 families who had previously completed an in-depth interview as part of a national case–control study of Ewing’s sarcoma. Main outcome measures: Participants’ views on how participation in the previous study had affected them and what motivated them to participate. Results: Most study participants indicated that taking part in the previous study had been a positive experience. Most (n = 79 [97.5%]) believed their involvement would benefit others and were glad to have participated, despite expecting and finding some parts of the interview to be painful. Parents whose child was still alive at the time of the interview recalled participation as more painful than those whose child had died before the interview. Parents who had completed the interview less than a year before our study recalled it as being more painful than those who had completed it more than a year before. Conclusions: That people suffering bereavement are generally eager to participate in research and may indeed find it a positive experience is useful information for members of ethics review boards and other “gatekeepers”, who frequently need to determine whether studies into sensitive areas should be approved. Such information may also help members of the community to make an informed decision regarding participation in such research.

Ethics Committee Student Project Expedited Review Checklist

checklist for fast track review of student project by ECS ethics committee

Ethical review in creative industries and other practice-based research

The processes used in Australian universities for reviewing the ethics of research projects are based on the traditions of research and practice from the medical and health sciences. The national guidelines for ethical conduct in research are heavily based on presumptions that the researcher–participant relationship is similar to a doctor–patient relationship. The National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council and Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee have made a laudable effort to fix this problem by releasing the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research in 2007, to replace the 1999 National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans. The new statement better encompasses the needs of the humanities, social sciences and creative industries. However, this paper argues that the revised National Statement and ethical review processes within universities still do not fully encompass the definitions of ‘research’ and the requirements, traditions, codes of practice and standards of the humanities, social sciences and creative industries. The paper argues that scholars within these disciplines often lack the language to articulate their modes of practice and risk management strategies to university-level ethics committees. As a consequence, scholars from these disciplines may find their research is delayed or stymied. The paper focuses on creative industries researchers, and explores the issues that they face in managing the ethical review process, particularly when engaging in practice-based research. Although the focus is on the creative industries, the issues are relevant to most fields in the humanities and social sciences.

Misunderstanding or Misdirection?: Whistleblower Protection in Queensland

In his report into corruption in Queensland, Fitzgerald listed whistleblower protection as a necessary part of a strong governance regime. "What is required is an accessible, independent body to which disclosures can be made, confidentially (at least in the first instance) and in any event free from fear of reprisals." It was one of the reforms studied by the Electoral and Administrative Review Committee, the report of which resulted in the Whistleblowers Protection Act 1994 (WPA). The need for whistleblower protection was supported by all sides of Parliament. The Premier, Wayne Goss, in his Second Reading Speech on the Public Sector Ethics Bill , said that that Act and the WPA would form a package with the former outlining required behaviour and the WPA encouraging staff to report wrongdoing. The WPA was subsequently passed and has remained virtually unamended for over a decade. Such consistency is either an indication of skilled drafting and effectiveness or the fact that the Act has been neglected. It is the hypothesis of this paper that the latter is the case. This hypothesis will be tested by examining the sincerity and diligence with which the Act has been treated during, and following, its passage.

Competition policy review : draft recommendations on competition laws

On 4 December 2013, the Prime Minister and the Minister for Small Business announced a “root and branch” review of Australia’s competition policy. The Minister for Small Business released the final Terms of Reference for the competition policy review on 27 March 2014, following consultation with the States and Territories, and announced the Review Panel headed by Professor Ian Harper. Under the terms of reference the Competition Policy Review Committee (the Harper Committee) is required to focus on three broad areas: •examining what can be done to create more competition in service areas such as health, education and intellectual property; •considering whether the structure and powers of the competition institutions (the ACCC , the NCC, the Tribunal and the AER) remain appropriate; and •examining the effectiveness of the competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and laying down a broad framework through which the law can be streamlined and reformed over time.