Characterizations of juvenile stages of some semaeostome Scyphozoa (Cnidaria), with recognition of a new family (Phacellophoridae)

Phacellophora camtschatica has long been assigned to the semaeostome scyphozoan family Ulmaridae. Early stages (scyphistomae, strobilae, ephyrae, postephyrae, and young medusae) of the species were compared with those of several other semaeostomes currently assigned to Ulmaridae, Pelagiidae, and Cyaneidae. Juveniles of P. camtschatica did not strictly conform with characters of those of any of these families, and appeared intermediate between Cyaneidae and Ulmaridae. A new family, Phacellophoridae, is proposed to accommodate P. camtschatica.

Ecologia da polinização de Passiflora suberosa Linnaeus (Passifloraceae)

Passiflora suberosa Linnaeus (Passifloraceae), uma espécie de maracujá nativa no Rio Grande do Sul, é estudada em relação à biologia reprodutiva e ao processo de polinização. As avaliações são realizadas em populações cultivadas de P. suberosa presentes em áreas urbanas no Munícipio de Porto Alegre, RS. Aspectos concernentes à biologia floral foram avaliadas em uma população do Campus do Vale(UFRGS). A observação e coleta dos visitantes florais foi realizada em um jardim residencial, no bairro Passo da Areia. Avalia-se o sistema reprodutivo de P. suberosa em condições de campo através de três tratamentos: xenogamia, autogamia espontânea e autogamia manual. Um grupo de flores é marcado e deixado em condições naturais(controle) para se observar a formação de frutos. O padrão de produção e o volume de néctor produzido foram observados em flores isoladas e amostradas a cada duas horas das 8 as 18 horas. O efeito provocado pela remoção intermitente de néctar foi avaliado nas mesmas flores. A quantidade diária de néctar produzida foi avaliada utilizando-se um novo conjunto de flores a cada amostragem Para verificar o padrão de disponibilização diária de pólen, amostrou-se flores isoladas a cada 30 minutos, das 7 às 14 horas. Similarmente, flores não isoladas foram avaliadas para determinar quanto tempo o pólen permanece disponível na presença dos visitantes florais.A receptividade do estigma foi testada in vivo, por meio de polinização manual em flores emasculadas, das 8 até às 18 horas. Os visitantes florais foram monitorados de dezembro de 2001 a novembro de 2002.Observações seguidas de coleta foram realizadas a cada quinze dias, no período entre as 8 e as 14 horas. Nessas ocasiões, as flores abertas foram contadas e registrava-se a posição das pétalas, anteras e estigmas. Os visitantes florais foram observados em relação a hora da visita, contato com anteras e/ou estigmas, partes do corpo que contava as estruturas reprodutivas, presença de pólen no corpo e taxa de visita Os grãos de pólen aderidos no dorso dos insetos foram montados em lâminas microscópicas e analisadas em laboratório. Os resotados indicam que P. suberosa é autocompatível, entretanto a autofecundação espontânea não parece ser freqüente devido a posição das anteras e estigmas na flor. O polén não é disponibilizado de forma gradual, devido ao fato das cinco anteras de uma mesma flor tornarem-se deiscentes em tempos diferentes, desde a abertura da flor até o final da manhã, período em que todo o pólen está disponível. O número de flores com estigmas receptivos na população variou durante o dia, sendo o período entre 10 e 15 horas aquele em que se observou o maior número de flores receptivas. As flores P. suberosa já abriram com algum néctar disponível e continuaram produzindo. As 10 horas observou-se o volume máximo de néctar produzido durante o dia. As folhas foram visitadas principalmente por Polybia ignobilis, Pachodynerus guadulpensis, Polistes versicolor, Polistes cavapytiformis (Vespidae), por Augochloropsis sp. e Augochlorella ephyra (halictidae) e por Apis mellifera(Apidae). Ainda que todos os visitantes florais amostrados possam polinizar as flores, Polybia ignobilis, dado os seus atributos morfológicos, padrão comportamental de forrageio e a grande quantidade de pólen amostrada sobre a região dorsal do tórax, foi aquela que efetivamente contribuiu para a polinização da população de P. suberosa estudada.

Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in summer 1998 during the National Monitoring Programme

The dataset is based on samples collected in the summer of 1998 in the Western Black Sea in front of Bulgaria coast. The whole dataset is composed of 69 samples (from 22 stations of National Monitoring Grid) with data of mesozooplankton species composition abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 0-20, 0-50, 10-25, 25-50, 50-100 and from bottom up to the surface at depths depending on water column stratification and the thermocline depth. Zooplankton samples were collected with vertical closing Juday net,diameter - 36cm, mesh size 150 µm. Tows were performed from surface down to bottom meters depths in discrete layers. Samples were preserved by a 4% formaldehyde sea water buffered solution. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Mesozooplankton abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). Taxon-specific abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972).

Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in summer 2000 during the National Monitoring Programme

The dataset is based on samples collected in the summer of 2000 in the Western Black Sea in front of Bulgaria coast. The whole dataset is composed of 84 samples (from 31 stations of National Monitoring Grid) with data of mesozooplankton species composition abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 0-20, 0-50, 10-25, 25-50, 50-100 and from bottom up to the surface at depths depending on water column stratification and the thermocline depth. The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972).