Introduction to the special issue on employment discrimination against immigrants

Purpose - This editorial aims to introduce the special issue on employment discrimination against immigrants. Design/methodology/approach - The first part is a commentary on key issues in the study of employment discrimination against immigrants. The second part presents the five articles in the special issue. Findings - The papers in this special issue focus on a variety of issues associated with employment discrimination against immigrants. For example, they consider: discrimination based on accents; differences among justice perceptions among immigrants and non-immigrants; the effects of negative stereotypes on workplace outcomes; the treatment of Hispanic immigrants; and the reasons for the lack of research on Hispanic immigrants. Research limitations/implications - The author comments on key issues that researchers of employment discrimination against immigrants have to take into account. These issues include: the appreciation of the diversity among immigrants; an understanding of the complexity of employment discrimination research; openness to cross-disciplinary approaches; and the consideration of employment discrimination within the context of the immigrant experience. The five articles that make up the special issues vary in their nature (empirical, critical), methodologies (quantitative, qualitative), locations (United States, Germany, and Canada), and implications. Practical implications - The issues discussed in the papers have important implications for understanding and overcoming employment discrimination against immigrants. Originality/value - The Journal of Managerial Psychology invited this special issue to initiate psychological research on employment discrimination against immigrants. The intent is to draw the attention of organizational scholars to the large, yet under-studied immigrant segment of the workforce.

The skill paradox: Explaining and reducing employment discrimination against skilled immigrants

Using a social identity theory approach, we theorized that recruiters might be particularly biased against skilled immigrant applicants. We refer to this phenomenon as a skill paradox, according to which immigrants are more likely to be targets of employment discrimination the more skilled they are. Furthermore, building on the common ingroup identity model, we proposed that this paradox can be resolved through human resource management (HRM) strategies that promote inclusive hiring practices (e.g., by emphasizing fit with a diverse clientele). The results from a laboratory experiment were consistent with our predictions: Local recruiters preferred skilled local applicants over skilled immigrant applicants, but only when these applicants were qualified for a specific job. This bias against qualified and skilled immigrant applicants was attenuated when fit with a diverse clientele was emphasized, but not when fit with a homogeneous clientele was emphasized or when the hiring strategy was not explained. We discuss the implications of our findings for research on employment discrimination against skilled immigrants, including the role of inclusiveness for reducing discriminatory biases.

To eliminate employment discrimination : a sequel : the Federal civil rights enforcement effort--1977 : a report /

A sequel to v. 5 of its The Federal civil rights enforcement effort--1974.

Sex discrimination : employment discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the Equal Pay Act of 1963.

"May 1995."

Employment discrimination and how to deal with it : a manual for people concerned with helping former drug abusers /

Mode of access: Internet.

Religious discrimination : employment discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.

"January 2002 (Revised)."

Race & color discrimination : employment discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.

"January 2002 (Revised)."

Age discrimination : employment discrimination prohibited by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended.

"January 2002 (revised)."

National origin discrimination : employment discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended /

"January 2002 (Revised)."

Sex discrimination : employment discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the Equal Pay Act of 1963.

"January 2002 (Revised)."

Experimental Evidence that Retaliation Claims Are Unlike Other Employment Discrimination Claims

The type of discrimination claim that strikes fear in the hearts of all employers is the dreaded retaliation claim. While employers contend, and plaintiffs admit, that retaliation is different from other discrimination complaints, employee advocates have put forth legislation that would equalize retaliation with the other types of discrimination. This bill, Protecting Older Workers against Discrimination Act (POWADA), would expand the so-called mixed-motive jury instruction to age, and disability, as well as retaliation. Moreover, it would allow plaintiffs, not judges, to decide which types of instruction the jury would receive. In this article, the authors argue that retaliation claims should not receive the same treatment as other discrimination claims (including age and disability), because it’s easy for juries to believe that retaliation is a factor, regardless of other facts. Once a fact-finding jury checks the box to indicate that an employer’s motive might include retaliation, the employer will likely have to pay fees and costs, at minimum, regardless of the claim’s final resolution.

Why Does Employment Discrimination Persist against People with Mental Illness? Effects of Negative Stereotypes, Power, and Differential Discrimination

Mental illness affects a sizable minority of Americans at any given time, yet many people with mental illness (hereafter PWMI) remain unemployed or underemployed relative to the general population. Research has suggested that part of the reason for this is discrimination toward PWMI. This research investigated mechanisms that affect employment discrimination against PWMI. Drawing from theories on stigma and power, three studies assessed 1) the stereotyping of workers with mental illness as unfit for workplace success, 2) the impact of positive information on countering these negative stereotypes, and whether negatively-stereotyped conditions elicited discrimination; and 3) the effects of power on mental illness stigma components. I made a series of predictions related to theories on the Stereotype Content Model, illness attribution, the contact hypothesis, gender and mental health, and power. Studies tested predictions using, 1) an online vignette survey measuring attitudes, 2) an online survey measuring responses to fictitious applications for a middle management position, and 3) a laboratory experiment in which some participants were primed to feel powerful and some were not. Results of Study 1 demonstrated that PWMI were routinely stigmatized as incompetent, dangerous, and lacking valued employment attributes, relative to a control condition. This was especially evident for workers presented as having PTSD from wartime service and workers with schizophrenia, and when the worker was a woman. Study 2 showed that, although both war-related PTSD and schizophrenia evoke negative stereotypes, only schizophrenia evoked hiring discrimination. Finally, Study 3 found no effect of being primed to feel powerful on stigmatizing attitudes toward a person with symptoms of schizophrenia. Taken together, findings suggest that employment discrimination towards PWMI is driven by negative stereotypes; but, stereotypes might not lead to actual hiring discrimination for some labeled individuals.

Equal employment opportunity : EEOC Birmingham office closed discrimination charges without full investigation : report to Congressional requesters /

"B-226674"--P. [1].

The Law of Lending Discrimination, June 2010

The purpose of this article is two-fold. First, it provides an overview of the types of lending discrimination, discusses what laws apply to lending discrimination, and explains how to establish a prima facie case and pretext. This discussion will borrow concepts and case law from the areas of employment discrimination and the related issue of rental discrimination. Each of these areas share similar required elements as well as the need to establish pre-text. Second, this article provides an overview of predatory lending practices, applicable law, and potential remedies.

Programme d’accès à l’égalité : réactions managériales au cadre légal québécois pour combattre la discrimination

En 1985, la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne (L.R.Q., ch. C-12) du Québec était amendée afin d’inclure une nouvelle section consacrée aux programmes d’accès à l’égalité (PAE). Cet ajout résulte du constat d’une situation d’inégalité sur le marché du travail québécois pour les membres de certains groupes, en raison de motifs illicites de discrimination. Concrètement, on observe une certaine ségrégation professionnelle, de faibles revenus moyens et des conditions précaires d’emploi. L’objectif des PAE est de redresser la situation de groupes victimes de discrimination; pour réaliser cet objectif, ils autorisent la mise en œuvre de mesures spécifiques à l’intention de ces derniers. Plusieurs types de PAE ont été mis en place par les gouvernements québécois successifs afin d’élargir leur champ d’application. Parmi ces différents types de PAE, cette étude se concentre sur ceux associés à l’obligation contractuelle qui obligent toutes les organisations qui emploient 100 employés ou plus et qui obtiennent un contrat ou une subvention du gouvernement du Québec d’une valeur de 100 000 $ et plus, à développer et à mettre en œuvre un PAE. Il s’agit de la principale forme de PAE touchant les organisations privées. Quatre groupes cibles sont identifiés dans ces PAE : les femmes, les membres des minorités visibles, les Autochtones et les personnes handicapées. Parmi ceux-ci, compte tenu de la croissance importante de ce groupe et des situations souvent aiguës de discrimination qu’ils vivent sur le marché du travail québécois, l’attention sera portée sur le groupe des minorités visibles. Très peu de recherches ont été réalisées sur ces PAE en raison d’une obligation de confidentialité de résultats complète. Les rares études effectuées jusqu’à présent ont constaté des progrès très inégaux entre les employeurs : alors qu’un petit nombre d’organisations semblaient progresser rapidement dans l’atteinte de leurs objectifs, la vaste majorité stagnait ou encore progressait très lentement. Ce constat menait à s’interroger sur les facteurs, autres que le cadre juridique, qui peuvent expliquer le niveau de conformité aux objectifs. En se basant sur une analyse de contenu d’entrevues semi-dirigées menées auprès de gestionnaires responsables des PAE dans 31 organisations privées de la région de Montréal, plusieurs facteurs des environnements externes et internes des organisations, ont été identifiés pour expliquer les niveaux de conformité aux objectifs qualitatifs. Parmi les facteurs positivement reliés, on remarque l’engagement des membres de la haute direction en faveur des PAE, la mise en place d’un système d’imputabilité et la perception de certains bénéfices liés à la diversification des effectifs. Au contraire, la confusion entre l’égalité et l’équité, le fait de privilégier les mouvements internes de personnel et les biais des gestionnaires de première ligne semblent être négativement reliés à l’atteinte des objectifs qualitatifs. Ces résultats démontrent l’importance que prennent les facteurs liés à l’environnement interne, surtout lorsque le cadre juridique est peu contraignant et que les gestionnaires croient que les probabilités de sanctions sont faibles. En se basant sur ces résultats, une série de recommandations est proposée, afin d’améliorer les PAE, mais aussi afin d’améliorer la compréhension des gestionnaires des ressources humaines sur ce qu’est la discrimination en emploi et les moyens les plus appropriés pour la combattre.