Towards a structured understanding of caregivers’ safety behaviour in the domestic and driveway setting

Slow speed run-overs represent a major cause of injury and death among Australian children, with higher rates of incidents being reported in Queensland than in the remaining Australian states. Yet, little attention has been given to how caregivers develop their safety behaviour in and around the driveway setting. To address this gap, the current study aimed to develop a conceptual model of driveway child safety behaviours among caregivers of children aged five years or younger. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 caregivers (25 females/1 male, mean age, 33.24 year) from rural and metropolitan Queensland. To enable a comparison and validation of findings from the driveway, the study analysed both driveway and domestic safety behaviours. Domestic safety behaviours were categorised and validated against driveway safety behaviours, uncovering a process of risk appraisal and safety behaviour that was applicable in both settings (the Safety System Model). However, noteworthy differences between the domestic and driveway setting were uncovered. Unlike in the domestic setting, driveway risks were perceived as shifting according the presence of moving vehicles, which resulted in inconsistent safety behaviours. While the findings require further validation, they have implications for the design and implementation of driveway run-over interventions.

Developing guidelines for intervention to reduce risk of low-speed vehicle run-overs of young children

In Australia, research suggests that up to one quarter of child pedestrian hospitalisations result from driveway run-over incidents (Pinkney et al., 2006). In Queensland, these numbers equate to an average of four child fatalities and 81 children presenting at hospital emergency departments every year (The Commission for Children, Young People and Child Guardian). National comparison shows that these numbers represent a slightly higher per capita rate (23.5% of all deaths). To address this issue, the current research was undertaken with the aim to develop an educative intervention based on data collected from parents and caregivers of young children. Thus, the current project did not seek to use available intervention or educational material, but to develop a new evidence-based intervention specifically targeting driveway run-overs involving young children. To this end, general behavioural and environmental changes that caregivers had undertaken in order to reduce the risk of injury to any child in their care were investigated. Broadly, the first part of this report sought to: • develop a conceptual model of established domestic safety behaviours, and to investigate whether this model could be successfully applied to the driveway setting; • explore and compare sources of knowledge regarding domestic and driveway child safety; and • examine the theoretical implications of current domestic and driveway related behaviour and knowledge among caregivers. The aim of the second part of this research was to develop and test the efficacy of an intervention based on the findings in the first part of the research project. Specifically, it sought to: • develop an educational driveway intervention that is based on current safety behaviours in the domestic setting and informed by existing knowledge of driveway safety and behaviour change theory; and • evaluate its efficacy in a sample of parents and caregivers.

Australian domestic violence protection order legislation : a comparative quantitative content analysis of victim safety provisions

In Australia, protection orders are a key legal response to domestic violence, and are often viewed as a way of providing for victim safety. For instance, recently the joint Australian and New South Wales Law Reform Commissions recommended that a common core purpose of all state and territory domestic violence legislation should be ‘to ensure or maximise the safety and protection of persons who fear or experience family violence’ (2010:Recommendation 7-4). Drawing and building upon prior research in Australia and the United States (‘US’), this paper uses comparative quantitative content analysis to assess the victim safety focus of domestic violence protection order legislation in each Australian state and territory. The findings of this analysis show that the Northern Territory, South Australia and Victoria ‘stand out’ from the other jurisdictions, having the highest victim safety focus in their legislation. However, there remains sizeable scope for improvement in all Australian jurisdictions, in terms of the victim safety focus of their legislative provisions and the considerations of legislative inconsistency between jurisdictions.

Motor vehicle safety defect recall campaigns from January 1, 1971 to December 31, 1971; reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers.

Mode of access: Internet.

Motor vehicle safety defect recall campaigns reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers, January 1, 1972 to December 31, 1972.

Mode of access: Internet.

Motor vehicle safety defect recall campaigns reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. January 1, 1973 to December 31, 1973.

Mode of access: Internet.

Motor vehicle safety defect recall campaigns reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. January 1, 1974 to December 31, 1974.

Mode of access: Internet.

Motor vehicle safety defect recall campaigns reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. January 1, 1975 to December 31, 1975.

Mode of access: Internet.

Motor vehicle safety defect recall campaigns reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. January 1, 1976 to December 31, 1976.

Mode of access: Internet.

Safety related recall campaigns for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment, including tires, reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. January 1, 1979 to December 31, 1979.

Mode of access: Internet.

Safety related recall campaigns for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment, including tires, reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. January 1, 1980 to December 31, 1980.

Mode of access: Internet.

Safety related recall campaigns for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment, including tires, reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. Supplement - recall campaign completion status. January 1, 1980 to December 31, 1980.

Mode of access: Internet.

Safety related recall campaigns for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment, including tires, reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. January 1, 1981 to December 31, 1981.

Mode of access: Internet.

Safety related recall campaigns for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment, including tires, reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. January 1, 1983 to December 31, 1983.

Mode of access: Internet.

Safety related recall campaigns for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment, including tires, reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by domestic and foreign vehicle manufacturers. January 1, 1985 to December 31, 1985.

Mode of access: Internet.