Investigations on maar-diatreme volcanoes by inversion of magnetic and gravity data from the Eifel area, Germany

A study of maar-diatreme volcanoes has been perfomed by inversion of gravity and magnetic data. The geophysical inverse problem has been solved by means of the damped nonlinear least-squares method. To ensure stability and convergence of the solution of the inverse problem, a mathematical tool, consisting in data weighting and model scaling, has been worked out. Theoretical gravity and magnetic modeling of maar-diatreme volcanoes has been conducted in order to get information, which is used for a simple rough qualitative and/or quantitative interpretation. The information also serves as a priori information to design models for the inversion and/or to assist the interpretation of inversion results. The results of theoretical modeling have been used to roughly estimate the heights and the dip angles of the walls of eight Eifel maar-diatremes — each taken as a whole. Inversemodeling has been conducted for the Schönfeld Maar (magnetics) and the Hausten-Morswiesen Maar (gravity and magnetics). The geometrical parameters of these maars, as well as the density and magnetic properties of the rocks filling them, have been estimated. For a reliable interpretation of the inversion results, beside the knowledge from theoretical modeling, it was resorted to other tools such like field transformations and spectral analysis for complementary information. Geologic models, based on thesynthesis of the respective interpretation results, are presented for the two maars mentioned above. The results gave more insight into the genesis, physics and posteruptive development of the maar-diatreme volcanoes. A classification of the maar-diatreme volcanoes into three main types has been elaborated. Relatively high magnetic anomalies are indicative of scoria cones embeded within maar-diatremes if they are not caused by a strong remanent component of the magnetization. Smaller (weaker) secondary gravity and magnetic anomalies on the background of the main anomaly of a maar-diatreme — especially in the boundary areas — are indicative for subsidence processes, which probably occurred in the late sedimentation phase of the posteruptive development. Contrary to postulates referring to kimberlite pipes, there exists no generalized systematics between diameter and height nor between geophysical anomaly and the dimensions of the maar-diatreme volcanoes. Although both maar-diatreme volcanoes and kimberlite pipes are products of phreatomagmatism, they probably formed in different thermodynamic and hydrogeological environments. In the case of kimberlite pipes, large amounts of magma and groundwater, certainly supplied by deep and large reservoirs, interacted under high pressure and temperature conditions. This led to a long period phreatomagmatic process and hence to the formation of large structures. Concerning the maar-diatreme and tuff-ring-diatreme volcanoes, the phreatomagmatic process takes place due to an interaction between magma from small and shallow magma chambers (probably segregated magmas) and small amounts of near-surface groundwater under low pressure and temperature conditions. This leads to shorter time eruptions and consequently to structures of smaller size in comparison with kimberlite pipes. Nevertheless, the results show that the diameter to height ratio for 50% of the studied maar-diatremes is around 1, whereby the dip angle of the diatreme walls is similar to that of the kimberlite pipes and lies between 70 and 85°. Note that these numerical characteristics, especially the dip angle, hold for the maars the diatremes of which — estimated by modeling — have the shape of a truncated cone. This indicates that the diatreme can not be completely resolved by inversion.

The origin of a large (>3km) maar volcano by coalescence of multiple shallow craters: Lake Purrumbete maar, southeastern Australia

Lake Purrumbete maar is located in the intraplate, monogenetic Newer Volcanics Province in southeastern Australia. The extremely large crater of 3000. m in diameter formed on an intersection of two fault lines and comprises at least three coalesced vents. The evolution of these vents is controlled by the interaction of the tectonic setting and the properties of both hard and soft rock aquifers. Lithics in the maar deposits originate from country rock formations less than 300. m deep, indicating that the large size of the crater cannot only be the result of the downwards migration of the explosion foci in a single vent. Vertical crater walls and primary inward dipping beds evidence that the original size of the crater has been largely preserved. Detailed mapping of the facies distributions, the direction of transport of base surges and pyroclastic flows, and the distribution of ballistic block fields, form the basis for the reconstruction of the complex eruption history,which is characterised by alternations of the eruption style between relatively dry and wet phreatomagmatic conditions, and migration of the vent location along tectonic structures. Three temporally separated eruption phases are recognised, each starting at the same crater located directly at the intersection of two local fault lines. Activity then moved quickly to different locations. A significant volcanic hiatus between two of the three phases shows that the magmatic system was reactivated. The enlargement of especially the main crater by both lateral and vertical growth led to the interception of the individual craters and the formation of the large circular crater. Lake Purrumbete maar is an excellent example of how complicated the evolution of large, seemingly simple, circular maar volcanoes can be, and raises the question if these systems are actually monogenetic.

Difficulties in distinguishing coherent from fragmental kimberlite: A case study of the Muskox pipe (Northern Slave Province, Nunavut, Canada)

Kimberlite drill core from the Muskox pipe (Northern Slave Province, Nunavut, Canada) highlights the difficulties in distinguishing coherent from fragmental kimberlite and assessing the volcanological implications of the apparent gradational contact between the two facies. Using field log data, petrography, and several methods to quantify crystal and xenolith sizes and abundances, the pipe is divided into two main facies, dark-coloured massive kimberlite (DMK) and light-coloured fragmental kimberlite (LFK). DMK is massive and homogeneous, containing country-rock lithic clasts (~ 10%) and olivine macrocrysts (~ 15%) set in a dark, typically well crystallised, interstitial medium containing abundant microphenocrysts of olivine (~ 15%), opaques and locally monticellite, all of which are enclosed by mostly serpentine. In general, LFK is also massive and structureless, containing ~ 20% country-rock lithic clasts and ~ 12% olivine macrocrysts. These framework components are supported in a matrix of serpentinized olivine microphenocrysts (10%), microlites of clinopyroxene, and phlogopite, all of which are enclosed by serpentine. The contact between DMK and LFK facies is rarely sharp, and more commonly is gradational (from 5 cm to ~ 10 m). The contact divides the pipe roughly in half and is sub-vertical with an irregular shape, locally placing DMK facies both above and below the fragmental rocks. Most features of DMK are consistent with a fragmental origin, particularly the crystal- and xenolith-rich nature (~ 55-65%), but there are some similarities with rocks described as coherent kimberlite in the literature. We discuss possible origins of gradational contacts and consider the significance for understanding the origin of the DMK facies, with an emphasis on the complications of alteration overprinting of primary textures.

Some major problems with existing models and terminology associated with kimberlite pipes from a volcanological perspective, and some suggestions

Five significant problems hinder advances in understanding of the volcanology of kimberlites: (1) kimberlite geology is very model driven; (2) a highly genetic terminology drives deposit or facies interpretation; (3) the effects of alteration on preserved depositional textures have been grossly underestimated; (4) the level of understanding of the physical process significance of preserved textures is limited; and, (5) some inferred processes and deposits are not based on actual, modern volcanological processes. These issues need to be addressed in order to advance understanding of kimberlite volcanological pipe forming processes and deposits. The traditional, steep-sided southern African pipe model (Class I) consists of a steep tapering pipe with a deep root zone, a middle diatreme zone and an upper crater zone (if preserved). Each zone is thought to be dominated by distinctive facies, respectively: hypabyssal kimberlite (HK, descriptively called here massive coherent porphyritic kimberlite), tuffisitic kimberlite breccia (TKB, descriptively here called massive, poorly sorted lapilli tuff) and crater zone facies, which include variably bedded pyroclastic kimberlite and resedimented and reworked volcaniclastic kimberlite (RVK). Porphyritic coherent kimberlite may, however, also be emplaced at different levels in the pipe, as later stage intrusions, as well as dykes in the surrounding country rock. The relationship between HK and TKB is not always clear. Sub-terranean fluidisation as an emplacement process is a largely unsubstantiated hypothesis; modern in-vent volcanological processes should initially be considered to explain observed deposits. Crater zone volcaniclastic deposits can occur within the diatreme zone of some pipes, indicating that the pipe was largely empty at the end of the eruption, and subsequently began to fill-in largely through resedimentation and sourcing of pyroclastic deposits from nearby vents. Classes II and III Canadian kimberlite models have a more factual, descriptive basis, but are still inadequately documented given the recency of their discovery. The diversity amongst kimberlite bodies suggests that a three-model classification is an over-simplification. Every kimberlite is altered to varying degrees, which is an intrinsic consequence of the ultrabasic composition of kimberlite and the in-vent context; few preserve original textures. The effects of syn- to post-emplacement alteration on original textures have not been adequately considered to date, and should be back-stripped to identify original textural elements and configurations. Applying sedimentological textural configurations as a guide to emplacement processes would be useful. The traditional terminology has many connotations about spatial position in pipe and of process. Perhaps the traditional terminology can be retained in the industrial situation as a general lithofacies-mining terminological scheme because it is so entrenched. However, for research purposes a more descriptive lithofacies terminology should be adopted to facilitate detailed understanding of deposit characteristics, important variations in these, and the process origins. For example every deposit of TKB is different in componentry, texture, or depositional structure. However, because so many deposits in many different pipes are called TKB, there is an implication that they are all similar and that similar processes were involved, which is far from clear.

Pristine Early Eocene Wood Buried Deeply in Kimberlite from Northern Canada

We report exceptional preservation of fossil wood buried deeply in a kimberlite pipe that intruded northwestern Canada's Slave Province 53.3±0.6 million years ago (Ma), revealed during excavation of diamond source rock. The wood originated from forest surrounding the eruption zone and collapsed into the diatreme before resettling in volcaniclastic kimberlite to depths >300 m, where it was mummified in a sterile environment. Anatomy of the unpermineralized wood permits conclusive identification to the genus Metasequoia (Cupressaceae). The wood yields genuine cellulose and occluded amber, both of which have been characterized spectroscopically and isotopically. From cellulose d O and d H measurements, we infer that Early Eocene paleoclimates in the western Canadian subarctic were 12-17°C warmer and four times wetter than present. Canadian kimberlites offer Lagerstätte-quality preservation of wood from a region with limited alternate sources of paleobotanical information. © 2012 Wolfe et al.

Petrographie und Geochemie des Eckfelder Maares und von Hillscheid und die Einbindung in den Hocheifelvulkanismus

Tertiäre Vulkanite aus dem Eckfelder Maar, dem Hillscheider Diatrem und dem Hillscheid Basalt (Schlot) wurden petrologisch und geochemisch untersucht. Bis auf tonige Klasten aus dem Bohrkern des Eckfelder Maares handelt es sich bei allen weiteren Proben um undifferenzierte basische Vulkanite. Die tonigen Klasten aus dem Bohrkern müssen der ehemaligen Landoberfläche vor der Eruption des Eckfelder Maares zugerechnet werden, in dessen Krater sie während der Eruption hineingefallen sind. Bis auf die Proben des Hillscheid Basaltes sind die Proben alteriert. Die Alteration zeigt sich an der Bildung von Zeolithen und Calcitmineralisationen, die primär und sekundär gebildete Hohlräume aufgefüllt haben oder an einer vertonten Grundmasse der Proben, die daneben Mineraleinschlüsse (Spinell) und kantige Fremdgesteinsbruchstücke enthalten können. Bei den Proben mit vertonter Grundmasse handelt es sich um Palagonite, Umwandlungsprodukte aus Sideromelan (basaltischem Glas). Geochemische Analysen an Grundmassepräparaten der alterierten bis vertonten Proben zeigen, dass außer den immobilen Elementen Ti, Nb, Zr, Y alle weiteren Elemente teilweise bis vollständig abgereichert worden sind. Eine Ausnahme bildet Barium (Ba), welches z.T. in beträchtlichen Mengen in Zeolithen (Harmotom) angereichert wurde. Bei den Proben aus dem Eckfelder Maar kann die Alteration bis Vertonung der Proben alleine mit der Palagonitisierung und Verwitterung erklärt werden. Es gibt keine Hinweise auf Materialzufuhr und damit für sich anschließende hydrothermale Prozesse. Die Proben des Hillscheider Diatrem sind wesentlich geringer alteriert (glasige Grundmasse). Neuste Erkenntnisse aus einer Bohrung im Sommer 1999 im vermuteten Zentrum des Hillscheider Diatrems beschränken das Diatrem maximal auf einen kleineren Bereich im Nordosten der bisherigen Lokation. Bei der Bohrung stieß man nach 20 Meter auf Anstehendes. Im Hangschutt darüber fand man Blöcke des Hillscheid Basaltes. Eine geringere Größe der Lokation zusammen mit der geringen Alteration könnten auf deren Entstehung mit einer initialen Maarphase gefolgt von Schlackentätigkeit hinweisen. Die Schlacken könnten die ersten Ablagerungen vor Verwitterung geschützt haben. Allerdings gibt es keine Funde die eine Schlackentätigkeit belegen. Beim sogenannten 'Hillscheider Diatrem' könnte es sich aber auch um Hangschutt aus der Randbreccie des Hillscheider Basaltes handeln. Zusammen mit Bruchstücken aus dem Schlot des Hillscheid Basaltes wären die Palagonite des sogenannten 'Hillscheider Diatrem' erst in jüngster Zeit im Bereich einer Uferböschung zur Ablagerung gekommen. Dies würde allerdings das sogenannte 'Hillscheider Diatrem' in seiner Existenz in Frage stellen. Vergleiche der Proben des Hillscheid Basaltes mit basischen Hocheifelvulkaniten deuten auf kogenetische Beziehung aller Proben untereinander und ordnen die Proben des Hillscheid Basaltes geochemisch dem Hocheifelvulkanismus zu. REE- und weitere Spurenelementgehalte und auch deren Elementverhältnisse weisen für alle tertiären Eifelvulkanite gemeinsam auf Mantelschmelzen aus dem Bereich eines Granatperidotits mit niedrigen Aufschmelzgraden um ein Prozent hin. Vergleich der Elementverhältnisse hochinkompatibler Elemente im Bezug auf die Bildung mafischer Schmelzen mit primitivem Mantel deuten darauf hin, dass der Mantel im Bereich der Hocheifel verarmt ist an K, Rb, Sr und angereichert an Ba und eventuell an Nb. Ursachen für diese von typisch primären Mantelzusammensetzung abweichenden Verhältnisse könnten durch Mischungen von Mantelschmelzen mit lithosphärischem Mantel (K-Anomalie) und durch Anreicherungen mit fluiden Phasen (Ba-Anomalie) oder auch Schmelzen aus einem tieferliegenden Plume (Kelberger Hoch) verursacht worden sein. Englischer Zusammenfassung: