Conserved chromosomal clustering of genes governed by chromatin regulators in Drosophila

BACKGROUND: The trithorax group (trxG) and Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are responsible for the maintenance of stable transcriptional patterns of many developmental regulators. They bind to specific regions of DNA and direct the post-translational modifications of histones, playing a role in the dynamics of chromatin structure. RESULTS: We have performed genome-wide expression studies of trx and ash2 mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Using computational analysis of our microarray data, we have identified 25 clusters of genes potentially regulated by TRX. Most of these clusters consist of genes that encode structural proteins involved in cuticle formation. This organization appears to be a distinctive feature of the regulatory networks of TRX and other chromatin regulators, since we have observed the same arrangement in clusters after experiments performed with ASH2, as well as in experiments performed by others with NURF, dMyc, and ASH1. We have also found many of these clusters to be significantly conserved in D. simulans, D. yakuba, D. pseudoobscura and partially in Anopheles gambiae. CONCLUSION: The analysis of genes governed by chromatin regulators has led to the identification of clusters of functionally related genes conserved in other insect species, suggesting this chromosomal organization is biologically important. Moreover, our results indicate that TRX and other chromatin regulators may act globally on chromatin domains that contain transcriptionally co-regulated genes.

Conserved chromosomal clustering of genes governed by chromatin regulators in Drosophila

Background: The trithorax group (trxG) and Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are responsible for the maintenance of stable transcriptional patterns of many developmental regulators. They bind to specific regions of DNA and direct the post-translational modifications of histones, playing a role in the dynamics of chromatin structure.Results: We have performed genome-wide expression studies of trx and ash2 mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Using computational analysis of our microarray data, we have identified 25 clusters of genes potentially regulated by TRX. Most of these clusters consist of genes that encode structural proteins involved in cuticle formation. This organization appears to be a distinctive feature of the regulatory networks of TRX and other chromatin regulators, since we have observed the same arrangement in clusters after experiments performed with ASH2, as well as in experiments performed by others with NURF, dMyc, and ASH1. We have also found many of these clusters to be significantly conserved in D. simulans, D. yakuba, D. pseudoobscura and partially in Anopheles gambiae.Conclusion: The analysis of genes governed by chromatin regulators has led to the identification of clusters of functionally related genes conserved in other insect species, suggesting this chromosomal organization is biologically important. Moreover, our results indicate that TRX and other chromatin regulators may act globally on chromatin domains that contain transcriptionally co-regulated genes.

Insulin and TOR pathways regulate cellular and organismal growth through the myc oncogene in Drosophila

A large body of literature documents in both mice and Drosophila the involvement of Insulin pathway in growth regulation, probably due to its role in glucose and lipid import, nutrient storage, and translation of RNAs implicated in ribosome biogenesis (Vanhaesebroeck et al. 2001). Moreover several lines of evidence implicate this pathway as a causal factor in cancer (Sale, 2008; Zeng and Yee 2007; Hursting et al., 2007; Chan et al., 2008). With regards to Myc, studies in cell culture have implied this family of transcription factors as regulators of the cell cycle that are rapidly induced in response to growth factors. Myc is a potent oncogene, rearranged and overexpressed in a wide range of human tumors and necessary during development. Its conditional knock-out in mice results in reduction of body weight due to defect in cell proliferation (Trumpp et al. 2001). Evidence from in vivo studies in Drosophila and mammals suggests a critical function for myc in cell growth regulation (Iritani and Eisenman 1999; Johnston et al. 1999; Kim et al. 2000; de Alboran et al. 2001; Douglas et al. 2001). This role is supported by our analysis of Myc target genes in Drosophila, which include genes involved in RNA binding, processing, ribosome biogenesis and nucleolar function (Orain et al 2003, Bellosta et al., 2005, Hulf et al, 2005). The fact that Insulin signaling and Myc have both been associated with growth control suggests that they may interact with each other. However, genetic evidence suggesting that Insulin signaling regulates Myc in vivo is lacking. In this work we were able to show, for the first time, a direct modulation of dMyc in response to Insulin stimulation/silencing both in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggest that dMyc up-regulation in response to DILPs signaling occurs both at the mRNA and potein level. We believe dMyc protein accumulation after Insulin signaling activation is conditioned to AKT-dependent GSK3β/sgg inactivation. In fact, we were able to demonstate that dMyc protein stabilization through phosphorylation is a conserved feature between Drosophila and vertebrates and requires multiple events. The final phosphorylation step, that results in a non-stable form of dMyc protein, ready to be degraded by the proteasome, is performed by GSK3β/sgg kinase (Sears, 2004). At the same time we demonstrated that CKI family of protein kinase are required to prime dMyc phosphorylation. DILPs and TOR/Nutrient signalings are known to communicate at several levels (Neufeld, 2003). For this reason we further investigated TOR contribution to dMyc-dependent growth regulation. dMyc protein accumulates in S2 cells after aminoacid stimulation, while its mRNA does not seem to be affected upon TORC1 inhibition, suggesting that the Nutrient pathway regulates dMyc mostly post-transcriptionally. In support to this hypothesis, we observed a TORC1-dependent GSK3β/sgg inactivation, further confirming a synergic effect of DILPs and Nutrients on dMyc protein stability. On the other hand, our data show that Rheb but not S6K, both downstream of the TOR kinase, contributes to the dMyc-induced growth of the eye tissue, suggesting that Rheb controls growth independently of S6K.. Moreover, Rheb seems to be able to regulate organ size during development inducing cell death, a mechanism no longer occurring in absence of dmyc. These observations suggest that Rheb might control growth through a new pathway independent of TOR/S6K but still dependent on dMyc. In order to dissect the mechanism of dMyc regulation in response to these events, we analyzed the relative contribution of Rheb, TOR and S6K to dMyc expression, biochemically in S2 cells and in vivo in morphogenetic clones and we further confirmed an interplay between Rheb and Myc that seems to be indipendent from TOR. In this work we clarified the mechanisms that stabilize dMyc protein in vitro and in vivo and we observed for the first time dMyc responsiveness to DILPs and TOR. At the same time, we discovered a new branch of the Nutrient pathway that appears to drive growth through dMyc but indipendently from TOR. We believe our work shed light on the mechanisms cells use to grow or restrain growth in presence/absence of growth promoting cues and for this reason it contributes to understand the physiology of growth control.

Genetic analysis of tumour initiation and progression in a Drosophila model of epithelial cancer

Neoplastic overgrowth depends on the cooperation of several mutations ultimately leading to major rearrangements in cellular behaviour. The molecular crosstalk occurring between precancerous and normal cells strongly influences the early steps of the tumourigenic process as well as later stages of the disease. Precancerous cells are often removed by cell death from normal tissues but the mechanisms responsible for such fundamental safeguard processes remain in part elusive. To gain insight into these phenomena I took advantage of the clonal analysis methods available in Drosophila for studying the phenotypes due to loss of function of the neoplastic tumour suppressor lethal giant larvae (lgl). I found that lgl mutant cells growing in wild-type imaginal wing discs are subject to the phenomenon of cell competition and are eliminated by JNK-dependent cell death because they express very low levels of dMyc oncoprotein compared to those in the surrounding tissue. Indeed, in non-competitive backgrounds lgl mutant clones are able to overgrow and upregulate dMyc, overwhelming the neighbouring tissue and forming tumourous masses that display several cancer hallmarks. These phenotypes are completely abolished by reducing dMyc abundance within mutant cells while increasing it in lgl clones growing in a competitive context re-establishes their tumourigenic potential. Similarly, the neoplastic growth observed upon the oncogenic cooperation between lgl mutation and activated Ras/Raf/MAPK signalling was found to be characterised by and dependent on the ability of cancerous cells to upregulate dMyc with respect to the adjacent normal tissue, through both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms, thereby confirming its key role in lgl-induced tumourigenesis. These results provide first evidence that the dMyc oncoprotein is required in lgl mutant tissue to promote invasive overgrowth in developing and adult epithelial tissues and that dMyc abundance inside versus outside lgl mutant clones plays a key role in driving neoplastic overgrowth.

Cell competition time line: winners kill losers, which are extruded and engulfed by hemocytes

Cell competition is a mechanism that eliminates slow dividing cells from a growing population. It is believed that the genes wasp, psr, and draper are active in the cells that win the competition ("winner cells") and that they are essential in the winner cells for the induction of apoptosis and for the elimination of the "loser cells." Here, we show that lack of those genes in winner cells appears to be dispensable for cell-competition-induced apoptosis and during dmyc-induced supercompetition. Moreover, winner clones do not need those genes in order to preserve their growth advantage. Finally, we find that most of the clearance of the apoptotic debris is not performed by winners but by recruited hemocytes, which are required for the removal of the apoptotic corpses at the very end. Therefore, engulfment is a consequence-not a cause-of loser cells' death.

An Intergenic Regulatory Region Mediates Drosophila Myc -Induced Apoptosis and Blocks Tissue Hyperplasia

Induction of cell-autonomous apoptosis following oncogene-induced overproliferation is a major tumor-suppressive mechanism in vertebrates. However, the detailed mechanism mediating this process remains enigmatic. In this study, we demonstrate that dMyc-induced cell-autonomous apoptosis in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster relies on an intergenic sequence termed the IRER (irradiation-responsive enhancer region). The IRER mediates the expression of surrounding proapoptotic genes, and we use an in vivo reporter of the IRER chromatin state to gather evidence that epigenetic control of DNA accessibility within the IRER is an important determinant of the strength of this response to excess dMyc. In a previous work, we showed that the IRER also mediates P53-dependent induction of proapoptotic genes following DNA damage, and the chromatin conformation within IRER is regulated by polycomb group-mediated histone modifications. dMyc-induced apoptosis and the P53-mediated DNA damage response thus overlap in a requirement for the IRER. The epigenetic mechanisms controlling IRER accessibility appear to set thresholds for the P53- and dMyc-induced expression of apoptotic genes in vivo and may have a profound impact on cellular sensitivity to oncogene-induced stress.

Dissecting signaling pathways that control glia migration in the developing Drosophila retina

The function of a complex nervous system relies on an intricate interaction between neurons and glial cells. However, as glial cells are generally born distant from the place where they settle, molecular cues are important to direct their migration. Glial cell migration is important in both normal development and disease, thus current research in the laboratory has been focused on dissecting regulatory events underlying that crucial process. With this purpose, the Drosophila eye imaginal disc has been used as a model. In response to neuronal photoreceptor differentiation, glial cells migrate from the CNS into the eye disc where they act to correctly wrap axons. To ensure proper development, attractive and repulsive signals must coordinate glial cell migration. Importantly, one of these signals is Bnl, a Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) ligand expressed by retinal progenitor cells that was suggested to act as a non-autonomous negative regulator of excessive glial cell migration (overmigration) by binding and activating the Btl receptor expressed by glial cells. Through the experimental results described in chapter 3 we gained a detailed insight into the function of bnl in eye disc growth, photoreceptor development, and glia migration. Interestingly, we did not find a direct correlation between the defects on the ongoing photoreceptors and the glia overmigration phenotype; however, bnl knockdown caused apoptosis of eye progenitor cells what was strongly correlated with glia migration defects. Glia overmigration due to Bnl down-regulation in eye progenitor cells was rescued by inhibiting the pro-apoptotic genes or caspases activity, as well as, by depleting JNK or Dp53 function in retinal progenitor cells. Thus, we suggest a cross-talk between those developmental signals in the control of glia migration at a distance. Importantly, these results suggest that Bnl does not control glial migration in the eye disc exclusively through its ability to bind and activate its receptor Btl in glial cells. We also discuss possible biological roles for the glia overmigration in the bnl knockdown background. Previous results in the lab showed an interaction between dMyc, a master regulator of tissue growth, and Dpp, a Transforming Growth Factor-β important for retinal patterning and for accurate glia migration into the eye disc. Thus, we became interested in understanding putative relationships between Bnl and dMyc. In chapter 4, we show that they positively cooperate in order to ensure proper development of the eye disc. This work highlights the importance of the FGF signaling in eye disc development and reveals a signaling network where a range of extra- and intra-cellular signals cooperate to non-autonomously control glial cell migration. Therefore, such inter-relations could be important in other Drosophila cellular contexts, as well as in vertebrate tissue development.

Harnessing the power of Drosophila model to obtain new insights on MYC and ABCC1 cellular functions: from neuroblastoma to autism spectrum disorder

MYCN amplification is a genetic hallmark of the childhood tumour neuroblastoma. MYCN-MAX dimers activate the expression of genes promoting cell proliferation. Moreover, MYCN seems to transcriptionally repress cell differentiation even in absence of MAX. We adopted the Drosophila eye as model to investigate the effect of high MYC to MAX expression ratio on cells. We found that dMyc overexpression in eye cell precursors inhibits cell differentiation and induces the ectopic expression of Antennapedia (the wing Hox gene). The further increase of MYC/MAX ratio results in an eye-to-wing homeotic transformation. Notably, dMyc overexpression phenotype is suppressed by low levels of transcriptional co-repressors and MYCN associates to the promoter of Deformed (the eye Hox gene) in proximity to repressive sites. Hence, we envisage that, in presence of high MYC/MAX ratio, the “free MYC” might inhibit Deformed expression, leading in turn to the ectopic expression of Antennapedia. This suggests that MYCN might reinforce its oncogenic role by affecting the physiological homeotic program. Furthermore, poor neuroblastoma outcome associates with a high level of the MRP1 protein, encoded by the ABCC1 gene and known to promote drug efflux in cancer cells. Intriguingly, this correlation persists regardless of chemotherapy and ABCC1 overexpression enhances neuroblastoma cell motility. We found that Drosophila dMRP contributes to the adhesion between the dorsal and ventral epithelia of the wing by inhibiting the function of integrin receptors, well known regulators of cell adhesion and migration. Besides, integrins play a crucial role during synaptogenesis and ABCC1 locus is included in a copy number variable region of the human genome (16p13.11) involved in neuropsychiatric diseases. Interestingly, we found that the altered dMRP/MRP1 level affects nervous system development in Drosophila embryos. These preliminary findings point out novel ABCC1 functions possibly defining ABCC1 contribution to neuroblastoma and to the pathogenicity of 16p13.11 deletion/duplication