INTRAVASCULAR ANTI-IGE CHALLENGE IN PERFUSED LUNGS - MEDIATOR RELEASE AND VASCULAR PRESSOR-RESPONSE

Intravascular application of goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin E (IgE) was used to stimulate parenchymal mast cells in situ in perfused rabbit lungs. Sustained pulmonary arterial pressure rise was evoked in the absence of lung vascular permeability increase and lung edema formation. Early prostaglandin (PG) D2 and histamine release into the perfusate was documented, accompanied by more sustained liberation of cysteinyl leukotrienes (LT), LTB4, and PGI2. The quantities of these inflammatory mediators displayed the following order: histamine > cysteinyl-LT > PGI2 > LTB4 > PGD2. Pressor response and inflammatory mediator release revealed corresponding bell-shaped dose dependencies. Cyclooxygenase inhibition (acetylsalicylic acid) suppressed prostanoid generation, increased LT release, and did not substantially affect pressor response and histamine liberation. BW755 C, a cyclo- and lipoxygenase inhibitor, blocked the release of cysteinyl-LT and markedly reduced the liberation of the other inflammatory mediators as well as the pressor response. The H-1-antagonist clemastine caused a moderate reduction of the anti-IgE-provoked pressure rise. We conclude that intravascular anti-IgE challenge in intact lungs provokes the release of an inflammatory mediator profile compatible with in situ lung parenchymal mast cell activation. Pulmonary hypertension represents the predominant vascular response, presumably mediated by cysteinyl-LT and, to a minor extent, histamine liberation.

Pharmacological prevention of serious anaphylactic reactions due to iodinated contrast media: systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy of pharmacological prevention of serious reactions to iodinated contrast media. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search (multiple databases, bibliographies, all languages, to October 2005) for randomised comparisons of pretreatment with placebo or no treatment (control) in patients receiving iodinated contrast media. Review methods Trial quality was assessed by all investigators. Information on trial design, population, interventions, and outcomes was abstracted by one investigator and cross checked by the others. Data were combined by using Peto odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Nine trials (1975-96, 10 011 adults) tested H1 antihistamines, corticosteroids, and an H1-H2 combination. No trial included exclusively patients with a history of allergic reactions. Many outcomes were not allergy related, and only a few were potentially life threatening. No reports on death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, irreversible neurological deficit, or prolonged hospital stays were found. In two trials, 3/778 (0.4%) patients who received oral methylprednisolone 2x32 mg or intravenous prednisolone 250 mg had laryngeal oedema compared with 11/769 (1.4%) controls (odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.88). In two trials, 7/3093 (0.2%) patients who received oral methylprednisolone 2x32 mg had a composite outcome (including shock, bronchospasm, and laryngospasm) compared with 20/2178 (0.9%) controls (odds ratio 0.28, 0.13 to 0.60). In one trial, 1/196 (0.5%) patients who received intravenous clemastine 0.03 mg/kg and cimetidine 2-5 mg/kg had angio-oedema compared with 8/194 (4.1%) controls (odds ratio 0.20, 0.05 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Life threatening anaphylactic reactions due to iodinated contrast media are rare. In unselected patients, the usefulness of premedication is doubtful, as a large number of patients need to receive premedication to prevent one potentially serious reaction. Data supporting the use of premedication in patients with a history of allergic reactions are lacking. Physicians who are dealing with these patients should not rely on the efficacy of premedication.