Do romantic partners' responses to entry dyspareunia affect women's experience of pain? : the roles of catastrophizing and self-efficacy.

Introduction Entry dyspareunia is a sexual health concern which affects about 21% of women in the general population. Characterized by pain provoked during vaginal penetration, introital dyspareunia has been shown by controlled studies to have a negative impact on the psychological well-being, sexual function, sexual satisfaction, and quality of life of afflicted women. Many cognitive and affective variables may influence the experience of pain and associated psychosexual problems. However, the role of the partner's cognitive responses has been studied very little. Aim The aim of the present study was to examine the associations between partners' catastrophizing and their perceptions of women's self-efficacy at managing pain on one side and women's pain intensity, sexual function, and sexual satisfaction on the other. Methods One hundred seventy-nine heterosexual couples (mean age for women = 31, SD = 10.0; mean age for men = 33, SD = 10.6) in which the woman suffered from entry dyspareunia participated in the study. Both partners completed quantitative measures. Women completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Painful Intercourse Self-Efficacy Scale. Men completed the significant-other versions of these measures. Main Outcome Measures Dependent measures were women's responses to (i) the Pain Numeric Visual Analog Scale; (ii) the Female Sexual Function Index; and (iii) the Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction scale. Results Controlled for women's pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy, results indicate that higher levels of partner-perceived self-efficacy and lower levels of partner catastrophizing are associated with decreased pain intensity in women with entry dyspareunia, although only partner catastrophizing contributed unique variance. Partner-perceived self-efficacy and catastrophizing were not significantly associated with sexual function or satisfaction in women. Conclusions The findings suggest that partners' cognitive responses may influence the experience of entry dyspareunia for women, pointing toward the importance of considering the partner when treating this sexual health problem.

The relationship of adult attachment to emotion, catastrophizing, control, threshold and tolerance, in experimentally-induced pain

Although insecure attachment has been associated with a range of variables linked with problematic adjustment to chronic pain, the causal direction of these relationships remains unclear. Adult attachment style is, theoretically, developmentally antecedent to cognitions, emotions and behaviours (and might therefore be expected to contribute to maladjustment). It can also be argued, however, that the experience of chronic pain increases attachment insecurity. This project examined this issue by determining associations between adult attachment characteristics, collected prior to an acute (coldpressor) pain experience, and a range of emotional, cognitive, pain tolerance, intensity and threshold variables collected during and after the coldpressor task. A convenience sample of 58 participants with no history of chronic pain was recruited. Results demonstrated that attachment anxiety was associated with lower pain thresholds; more stress, depression, and catastrophizing; diminished perceptions of control over pain; and diminished ability to decrease pain. Conversely, secure attachment was linked with lower levels of depression and catastrophizing, and more control over pain. Of particular interest were findings that attachment style moderated the effects of pain intensity on the tendency to catastrophize, such that insecurely attached individuals were more likely to catastrophize when reporting high pain intensity. This is the first study to link attachment with perceptions of pain in a pain-free sample. These findings cast anxious attachment as a vulnerability factor for chronic pain following acute episodes of pain, while secure attachment may provide more resilience. (c) 2006 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Chronicity Factors Of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Critical Review Of The Literature.

Facial pain often persists long after any identifiable organic pathology has healed. Moreover, in a subgroup of patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD), no treatment is effective. Knowledge of factors associated with persistent pain in TMD could help identify personalized treatment approaches. Therefore, we conducted a critical review of the literature for the period from January 2000 to December 2013 to identify factors related to TMD development and persistence. The literature findings showed that chronic TMD is marked by psychological distress (somatization and depression, affective distress, fear of pain, fear of movement, and catastrophizing) and characteristics of pain amplification (hyperalgesia and allodynia). Furthermore, these factors seem to interact in TMD development. In addition, our review demonstrates that upregulation of the serotonergic pathway, sleep problems, and gene polymorphisms influence the chronicity of TMD. We conclude that psychological distress and pain amplification contribute to chronic TMD development, and that interactions among these factors complicate pain management. These findings emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary assistance in TMD treatment.

Alteration of cortical excitability in patients with fibromyalgia

We assessed cortical excitability and intracortical modulation systematically, by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, in patients with fibromyalgia. In total 46 female patients with fibromyalgia and 21 normal female subjects, matched for age, were included in this study. TMS was applied to the hand motor area of both hemispheres and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded for the first interosseous muscle of the contralateral hand. Single-pulse stimulation was used for measurements of the rest motor threshold (RMT) and suprathreshold MEP. Paired-pulse stimulation was used to assess short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Putative correlations were sought between changes in electrophysiological parameters and major clinical features of fibromyalgia, such as pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression and catastrophizing. The RMT on both sides was significantly increased in patients with fibromyalgia and suprathreshold MEP was significantly decreased bilaterally. However, these alterations, suggesting a global decrease in corticospinal excitability, were not correlated with clinical features. Patients with fibromyalgia also had lower ICF and SICI on both sides, than controls, these lower values being correlated with fatigue, catastrophizing and depression. These neurophysiological alterations were not linked to medication, as similar changes were observed in patients with or without psychotropic treatment. In conclusion, fibromyalgia is associated with deficits in intracortical modulation involving both GABAergic and glutamatergic mechanisms, possibly related to certain aspects of the pathophysiology of this chronic pain syndrome. Our data add to the growing body of evidence for objective and quantifiable changes in brain function in fibromyalgia. (C) 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Influência de um programa de exercícios específicos em estudantes de violino

Introdução: A elevada prevalência de problemas musculosqueléticos relacionados com a performance musical (PMRPM) em estudantes universitários de música, sobretudo violinistas, justifica uma abordagem preventiva junto destes, nomeadamente, através do exercício. Este deve ser específico e baseado nos padrões de movimento durante a performance musical do violinista. Objetivos: verificar a influência de um programa de exercícios específicos (PEE) nos sintomas relacionados com a prática musical, na incapacidade funcional e na autoperceção da performance física e musical, em estudantes universitários de violino. Métodos: estudo quase-experimental baseado num estudo piloto com 24 estudantes para pesquisa da sintomatologia, e 4 para análise cinemática e cinética do gesto técnico. No estudo principal participaram 22 violinistas divididos equitativamente, e por disponibilidade, entre grupo experimental (GE) e grupo de controlo (GC). O GE realizou o PEE bissemanalmente, durante 8 semanas. No momento inicial e após 8 semanas, os participantes preencheram: Questionário de Performance (incluiu Escala Visual Analógica), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Oswestry Disability Index versão 2.0, Pain Catastrophizing Scale e Escala de Borg Modificada. Resultados: do estudo piloto constatou-se que os sintomas mais frequentes, dor e fadiga, localizavam-se na cintura escapular, ombros e coluna lombar; os ombros aparentavam maior risco de PMRPM; era necessário aumentar a endurance dos mobilizadores dos membros superiores (principalmente deltóide) e relaxar os estabilizadores da coluna cervical (sobretudo trapézio superior). No final do PEE, o GE apresentou significativamente melhores pontuações do que o GC na percentagem de violinistas com “dor na coluna lombar esquerda” (p=0,007), frequência da dor (U=8,5; W=29,5; p=0,016), número de locais com sintomas (U=18; W=84; p=0,003) e amplificação (U=26; W=92; p=0,021). Conclusão: Um PEE pode produzir efeitos positivos na diminuição dos sintomas relacionados com a prática musical e incapacidade funcional, e na melhoria de alguns parâmetros da performance física autoreportada, em estudantes universitários de violino.

Dor crónica lombar : incapacidade auto-reportada em trabalhadores das IPSS de Arronches e sua relação com factores psicossociais e intensidade da dor

RESUMO: Vários estudos realizados sugerem que os factores psicossociais (nível de satisfação laboral; nível educacional; a catastrofização da dor e crenças de medoevitamento)têm um importante papel como factores associados ao desenvolvimento de cronicidade da DL (Krismer & van Tulder, 2007; Kwon et al., 2006; Leclerc et al., 2009; Pincus, Santos, Breen, Burton e Underwood., 2008.) Objectivo: Analisar a associação entre as variáveis catastrofização da dor, crenças de medo-evitamento da dor e intensidade da dor com a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada, numa amostra de indivíduos com DCL. Metodologia: A população alvo foi constituída por 160 funcionários da Santa Casa da Misericórdia e Centro de Bem Estar Social de Arronches. Integraram a amostra 133 funcionários que se disponibilizaram a responder aos diferentes instrumentos de avaliação utilizados (“Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire”(RMQ); “ Questionário de Caracterização e Levantamento de Factores de Risco e Impacto associado à DCL”; “Pain Catastrophing Scale” (PCS) e o “Fear- Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire” (FABQ). A recolha de dados realizou-se entre Agosto e Novembro de 2010. Resultados: Neste estudo, verificou-se que 39,1 % dos indivíduos referiam DCL não específica. Relativamente à incapacidade funcional autoreportada, obteve-se um score médio 5,87 no RMQ. Obteve-se um valor de rs=0,425,p<0,01, para a associação entre a catastrofização da dor e incapacidade. Relativamente à associação entre crenças de medo-evitamento, sub-escala actividade física e incapacidade, foi obtido o valor de rs= 0,074 e para a associação entre as crenças de medo-evitamento, sub-escala trabalho e incapacidade, verificou-se rs=0,422, p<0,01. No que respeita à associação entre percepção da intensidade dor actual e a incapacidade, obteve-se um valor rs= 0,177 e a associação entre a dor percepcionada em 2009 e incapacidade, aferiu um resultado de rs=0,291, p<0,05. Conclusão: Concluímos que existe uma associação moderada entre catastrofização da dor e a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada, e também entre crenças de medo-evitamento relativamente ao trabalho e a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada. Relativamente à associação entre a dor percepcionada em 2009 e a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada a associação é baixa. Não sendo encontrada associação entre crenças de medo-evitamento relativamente à actividade física e a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada, nem para a associação entre percepção da intensidade da dor actual e a incapacidade. Esta pesquisa contribuiu assim, para dar a conhecer factores relevantes avaliar em indivíduos com DCL, podendo a sua modificação contribuir para a prevenir maiores níveis de incapacidade funcional ou melhorar a efectividade do tratamento utilizado. --------------------ABSTRACT: Several studies suggest that psychosocial factors (level of job satisfaction, education level, and the pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs) have an important role as factors associated with development of chronicity LBP (Krisma & van Tulder, 2007 ; Kwon et al., 2006, Leclerc et al. 2009; Pincus, Santos, Breen, Burton and Underwood., 2008.) Objective: To assess the association between the variables of pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain, intensity pain and self-reported functional disability in a sample of people with chronic LBP. Methodology: The study consisted of 160 employees of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia and Centro de Bem Estar Social of Arronches. Integrated sample of 133 employees who agreed to respond to different assessment tools used (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), "Questionnaire Survey of Characterization and Risk Factors and Impact associated with the DCL," "Pain Catastrophing Scale(PCS) and "Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Data collection took place between August and November 2010. Results: In this study, it was found that 39.1% of subjects reported no specific chronic LBP. For the self-reported functional disability, we obtained a medium score of 5.87 on the RMQ. We obtained a value of rs = 0.425, p <0.01, for the association between catastrophizing in pain and disability. Regarding the association between fear-avoidance beliefs, sub-scale physical activity and disability, was obtained a value of rs = 0.074 and for the association between fear-avoidance beliefs, sub-scale work and disability, there was rs = 0.422, p <0.01. Regarding the association between perceived pain intensity and pain disability present we obtained a value rs = 0.177 association between pain and perceived disability in 2009 and measured an outcome of rs = 0.291, p <0.05.Conclusion: That there is a moderate association between catastrophizing and pain self-reported functional disability, and also between fear-avoidance beliefs in relation to employment and self-reported functional disability. Regarding the association between pain and perceived disability in 2009 self-reported the association is low. Not being an association between earavoidance beliefs for physical activity and self-reported functional disability, or for the association between perception of current pain intensity and disability. This research contributed so, to disclose relevant factors evaluate in individuals with chronic LBP, its modification may help to prevent higher levels of functional disability or improve the effectiveness of treatment used.

Relação entre a catastrofização da dor, percepção da intensidade da dor e incapacidade funcional em utentes com cdor crónica cervical

RESUMO: Introdução/Objectivo: A influência dos factores psicossociais, e nomeadamente da catastrofização da dor, na percepção da intensidade da dor e na incapacidade funcional, auto-reportada por indivíduos com dor crónica cervical (DCC), tem sido alvo de estudo em vários países, evidenciando o constructo multidimensional da DCC. Neste sentido, esta investigação pretende estudar se a catastrofização da dor, é uma variável preditiva relativamente à percepção da intensidade da dor, e à incapacidade funcional. Secundariamente procurou-se averiguar se as relações encontradas se mantêm estáveis antes e após exposição a uma intervenção em fisioterapia. Metodologia: Neste estudo participaram 40 indivíduos com DCC de origem músculo-esquelética e causa não traumática, que foram expostos a uma intervenção em fisioterapia no Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação do Alcoitão e na Clinica AlcaisFisio, que cumpriram os critérios de inclusão e aceitarem participar livremente no mesmo. A recolha de dados realizou-se em dois momentos distintos, antes e após exposição à intervenção em fisioterapia. A catastrofização da dor foi avaliada por meio da Escala de Catastrofização da Dor (PCS), a intensidade da dor pela Escala Numérica da Dor (END), sendo realizada a medição da incapacidade funcional através do Neck Disability Index versão Portuguesa (NDI-PT). A análise estatística incluiu duas fases: fase descritiva e fase inferencial. Foram desenvolvidos modelos de regressão linear com vista a testar o poder preditivo da catastrofização da dor sobre a intensidade da dor e a incapacidade funcional. O nível de significância para o qual os valores se consideraram satisfatórios foi de p<0,05. O tratamento dos dados foi realizado no software PASW versão 18. Resultados: Observou-se que existe uma relação moderada, positiva e significativa, nos dois momentos de avaliação, entre a catastrofização da dor e a percepção da intensidade da dor (p<0,001), apresentando um poder preditivo de 27,9% e 46,7%, das pontuações da intensidade da dor, antes e após exposição à intervenção em fisioterapia, espectivamente. Observou-se que a catastrofização da dor tem uma relação forte, positiva e significativa com a incapacidade funcional, nos dois momentos de avaliação (p<0,001), predizendo 51,8% e 61,8%, das pontuações da incapacidade funcional, antes e após exposição à intervenção em fisioterapia, respectivamente. Conclusão: A catastrofização da dor é um factor psicossocial que apresenta relação moderada com a percepção da intensidade da dor, e forte com a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada por indivíduos com DCC de origem músculo-esquelética e causa não traumática, antes e após exposição à intervenção em fisioterapia. Os resultados do estudo sugerem, assim, uma importante influência da catastrofização da dor sobre a percepção da intensidade da dor e a incapacidade funcional em indivíduos com DCC, realçando o constructo multidimensional da DCC. ------------ABSTRACT: Background and Purpose: The influence of psychosocial factors, particularly, the pain catastrophizing, on pain intensity and functional disability in individuals with chronic neck pain (CNP) has been report among recent research literature. The first aim of this research was to verify the predictive value of pain catastrophizing on pain intensity and patient’s functional disability. Secondly it aimed to verify the stability of these relations before and after a physiotherapy treatment. Methodology: A sample of 40 subjects with CNP of musculoskeletal and non-traumatic causes was recruited from the patient’s list of two private clinics in Lisbon district following verification of the inclusion criteria. All participants agree to participate in the study and signed a consent form. Data was collected immediately before and after a period of physiotherapy treatment. Pain catastrophizing was assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-PT), patient perception of pain intensity was measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and functional disability was measured through the Neck Disability Index (NDI-PT). Data was analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics. Linear regression models were developed in order to test the predictive power of pain catastrophizing on pain intensity and functional disability. The minimal level of significance established was p<0,05. Data analysis was performed using the software PASW version 18. Results: A positive moderate relationship between pain catastrophizing and pain intensity was founded in both moments, before and after physiotherapy intervention, of data collection (p<0,001) with a predictive power of 27,9% and 46,7%, respectively. A positive strong relationship between pain catastrophizing and functional disability was founded in both moments, before and after physiotherapy intervention, of data collection (p<0,001), with a predictive power of 51,8% and 61,8%, respectively. Conclusion: Pain catastrophizing is a psychosocial factor that is correlated moderately with the perception of pain intensity and strongly with self-reported functionaldisability for individuals with CNP musculoskeletal origin and non-traumatic causes,before and after a physiotherapy intervention. The results of this study suggest that pain catastrophizing has an important influence on the report levels of pain intensity and functional disability in CNP patients. These results also emphasize the multidimensional nature of chronic neck pain.

Dor crónica lombar : incapacidada auto-reportada em trabalhadores de saúde e sua relação com variáveis psicossociais e intensidade da dor

RESUMO: A dor crónica lombar, é uma condição de saúde cuja prevalência tem aumentado nas últimas décadas. É uma condição que pode ser bastante incapacitante para o indivíduo e por consequência, ter importante impacto social e económico na sociedade. É um fenómeno complexo, multifactorial e pouco estudado na população portuguesa. Objectivo: Estudar a associação entre a catastrofização da dor, crenças de medo evitamento da dor, intensidade da dor e a incapacidade funcional auto reportada em indivíduos com dor crónica lombar. Metodologia: Estudo observacional analítico de corte transversal, com uma amostra de 38 indivíduos com dor crónica lombar, seleccionados a partir de uma população de 186 trabalhadores de uma unidade local de saúde. A recolha de dados foi realizada através de 4 instrumentos de avaliação: Questionário de caracterização e levantamento de factores de risco e impacto associados à dor crónica lombar; Questionário de incapacidade de Roland e Morris; Escala de catastrofização da dor; e Questionário de crenças de medo evitamento da dor. A análise dos dados foi feita através de estatística descritiva pela distribuição de frequências e medidas de tendência central para análise da prevalência e caracterização da amostra e por estatística inferencial para estudar as relações entre variáveis através do teste de correlação não paramétrico de Spearman. Resultados: A variável catastrofização da dor obteve um valor de correlação com a incapacidade auto-reportada de rs=0,473, para p<0,01; a variável crença de medo evitamento da dor relacionada com o trabalho obteve um valor de correlação com a incapacidade auto-reportada de rs=0,462 para p<0,01, a percepção da intensidade actual de dor e a intensidade percepcionada no ano anterior, obtiveram valores de correlação com a incapacidade auto-reportada de rs=0,327 e rs= 0,359 respectivamente para valor de p<0,05. Conclusão: As variáveis psicossociais catastrofização da dor e crença de medo evitamento da dor relacionada com o trabalho, influenciam de forma moderada a incapacidade em indivíduos com dor crónica lombar. A associação entre a intensidade da dor e a incapacidade parece ter um papel menos importante demonstrando associações baixas.--------------------------ABSTRACT: Chronic low back pain is a health condition whose prevalence has increased in recent decades. It is a condition that can be quite disabling for the individual and therefore have important social and economic impact on society. It is a complex phenomenon, multifactorial and poorly studied in the Portuguese population. Objective: To study the association between pain catastrophizing, fear avoidance beliefs, pain, pain intensity and self-reported functional disability in individuals with chronic low back pain. Methods: Observational analytical cross sectional study of a sample of 38 individuals with chronic low back pain, selected from a population of 186 workers at a local health unit. Data collection was performed through four assessment instruments: questionnaire characterization, evaluation of risk factors and impact associated to chronic low back pain, questionnaire Roland and Morris disability, pain catastrophizing scale and fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics for the distribution of frequencies and measures of central tendency to analyze the prevalence and characteristics of the sample and inferential statistics to study the relationships between variables by testing for Spearman nonparametric correlation. Results: The pain catastrophizing variable had a correlation value rs= 0,473, p<0,01 with the self-reported disability, the variable of fear avoidance belief of pain related to the work achived a correlation value with the self-reported disability, rs = 0.462 p <0.01, current pain intensity and in the previous year obtained values of correlation with self-reported disability rs = 0.327 and rs = 0.359 respectively for values of p <0.05 .Conclusion: The psychosocial variables of pain catastrophizing and fear avoidance belief of pain related to the work had a moderate association with disability in individuals with chronic low back pain. The association between pain intensity and disability seems to have a less important role demonstrating low associations.

Differential predictors of acute post-surgical pain intensity after abdominal hysterectomy and major joint arthroplasty

Author's personal copy

Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of instruments to measure neck pain disability

BACKGROUND. The NDI, COM and NPQ are evaluation instruments for disability due to NP. There was no Spanish version of NDI or COM for which psychometric characteristics were known. The objectives of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the Spanish version of the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire (NDI), and the Core Outcome Measure (COM), to validate its use in Spanish speaking patients with non-specific neck pain (NP), and to compare their psychometric characteristics with those of the Spanish version of the Northwick Pain Questionnaire (NPQ). METHODS. Translation/re-translation of the English versions of the NDI and the COM was done blindly and independently by a multidisciplinary team. The study was done in 9 primary care Centers and 12 specialty services from 9 regions in Spain, with 221 acute, subacute and chronic patients who visited their physician for NP: 54 in the pilot phase and 167 in the validation phase. Neck pain (VAS), referred pain (VAS), disability (NDI, COM and NPQ), catastrophizing (CSQ) and quality of life (SF-12) were measured on their first visit and 14 days later. Patients' self-assessment was used as the external criterion for pain and disability. In the pilot phase, patients' understanding of each item in the NDI and COM was assessed, and on day 1 test-retest reliability was estimated by giving a second NDI and COM in which the name of the questionnaires and the order of the items had been changed. RESULTS. Comprehensibility of NDI and COM were good. Minutes needed to fill out the questionnaires [median, (P25, P75)]: NDI. 4 (2.2, 10.0), COM: 2.1 (1.0, 4.9). Reliability: [ICC, (95%CI)]: NDI: 0.88 (0.80, 0.93). COM: 0.85 (0.75,0.91). Sensitivity to change: Effect size for patients having worsened, not changed and improved between days 1 and 15, according to the external criterion for disability: NDI: -0.24, 0.15, 0.66; NPQ: -0.14, 0.06, 0.67; COM: 0.05, 0.19, 0.92. Validity: Results of NDI, NPQ and COM were consistent with the external criterion for disability, whereas only those from NDI were consistent with the one for pain. Correlations with VAS, CSQ and SF-12 were similar for NDI and NPQ (absolute values between 0.36 and 0.50 on day 1, between 0.38 and 0.70 on day 15), and slightly lower for COM (between 0.36 and 0.48 on day 1, and between 0.33 and 0.61 on day 15). Correlation between NDI and NPQ: r = 0.84 on day 1, r = 0.91 on day 15. Correlation between COM and NPQ: r = 0.63 on day 1, r = 0.71 on day 15. CONCLUSION. Although most psychometric characteristics of NDI, NPQ and COM are similar, those from the latter one are worse and its use may lead to patients' evolution seeming more positive than it actually is. NDI seems to be the best instrument for measuring NP-related disability, since its results are the most consistent with patient's assessment of their own clinical status and evolution. It takes two more minutes to answer the NDI than to answer the COM, but it can be reliably filled out by the patient without assistance. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Register NCT00349544.

Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of instruments to measure neck pain disability

Background: The NDI, COM and NPQ are evaluation instruments for disability due to NP. There was no Spanish version of NDI or COM for which psychometric characteristics were known. The objectives of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the Spanish version of the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire (NDI), and the Core Outcome Measure (COM), to validate its use in Spanish speaking patients with non-specific neck pain (NP), and to compare their psychometric characteristics with those of the Spanish version of the Northwick Pain Questionnaire (NPQ).Methods: Translation/re-translation of the English versions of the NDI and the COM was done blindly and independently by a multidisciplinary team. The study was done in 9 primary care Centers and 12 specialty services from 9 regions in Spain, with 221 acute, subacute and chronic patients who visited their physician for NP: 54 in the pilot phase and 167 in the validation phase. Neck pain (VAS), referred pain (VAS), disability (NDI, COM and NPQ), catastrophizing (CSQ) and quality of life (SF-12) were measured on their first visit and 14 days later. Patients' self-assessment was used as the external criterion for pain and disability. In the pilot phase, patients' understanding of each item in the NDI and COM was assessed, and on day 1 test-retest reliability was estimated by giving a second NDI and COM in which the name of the questionnaires and the order of the items had been changed.Results: Comprehensibility of NDI and COM were good. Minutes needed to fill out the questionnaires [median, (P25, P75)]: NDI. 4 (2.2, 10.0), COM: 2.1 (1.0, 4.9). Reliability: [ICC, (95%CI)]: NDI: 0.88 (0.80, 0.93). COM: 0.85 (0.75,0.91). Sensitivity to change: Effect size for patients having worsened, not changed and improved between days 1 and 15, according to the external criterion for disability: NDI: -0.24, 0.15, 0.66; NPQ: -0.14, 0.06, 0.67; COM: 0.05, 0.19, 0.92. Validity: Results of NDI, NPQ and COM were consistent with the external criterion for disability, whereas only those from NDI were consistent with the one for pain. Correlations with VAS, CSQ and SF-12 were similar for NDI and NPQ (absolute values between 0.36 and 0.50 on day 1, between 0.38 and 0.70 on day 15), and slightly lower for COM (between 0.36 and 0.48 on day 1, and between 0.33 and 0.61 on day 15). Correlation between NDI and NPQ: r = 0.84 on day 1, r = 0.91 on day 15. Correlation between COM and NPQ: r = 0.63 on day 1, r = 0.71 on day 15.Conclusion: Although most psychometric characteristics of NDI, NPQ and COM are similar, those from the latter one are worse and its use may lead to patients' evolution seeming more positive than it actually is. NDI seems to be the best instrument for measuring NP-related disability, since its results are the most consistent with patient's assessment of their own clinical status and evolution. It takes two more minutes to answer the NDI than to answer the COM, but it can be reliably filled out by the patient without assistance.

Differential effects of two virtual reality interventions: distraction versus pain control

There is evidence that virtual reality (VR) pain distraction is effective at improving pain-related outcomes. However, more research is needed to investigate VR environments with other pain-related goals. The main aim of this study was to compare the differential effects of two VR environments on a set of pain-related and cognitive variables during a cold pressor experiment. One of these environments aimed to distract attention away from pain (VRD), whereas the other was designed to enhance pain control (VRC). Participants were 77 psychology students, who were randomly assigned to one of the following three conditions during the cold pressor experiment: (a) VRD, (b) VRC, or (c) Non-VR (control condition). Data were collected regarding both pain-related variables (intensity, tolerance, threshold, time perception, and pain sensitivity range) and cognitive variables (self-efficacy and catastrophizing). Results showed that in comparison with the control condition, the VRC intervention significantly increased pain tolerance, the pain sensitivity range, and the degree of time underestimation. It also increased self-efficacy in tolerating pain and led to a reduction in reported helplessness. The VRD intervention significantly increased the pain threshold and pain tolerance in comparison with the control condition, but it did not affect any of the cognitive variables. Overall, the intervention designed to enhance control seems to have a greater effect on the cognitive variables assessed. Although these results need to be replicated in further studies, the findings suggest that the VRC intervention has considerable potential in terms of increasing self-efficacy and modifying the negative thoughts that commonly accompany pain problems.

A phenomenological approach to understanding the psychological response to chronic low back pain

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a complex health problem of psychological manifestations not fully understood. Using interpretive phenomenological analysis, 11 semi-structured interviews were conducted to help understand the meaning of the lived experience of CLBP; focusing on the psychological response to pain and the role of depression, catastrophizing, fear-avoidance behavior, anxiety and somatization. Participants characterized CLBP as persistent tolerable low back pain (TLBP) interrupted by periods of intolerable low back pain (ILBP). ILBP contributed to recurring bouts of helplessness, depression, frustration with the medical system and increased fear based on the perceived consequences of anticipated recurrences, all of which were mediated by the uncertainty of such pain. During times of TLBP all participants pursued a permanent pain consciousness as they felt susceptible to experience a recurrence. As CLBP progressed, participants felt they were living with a weakness, became isolated from those without CLBP and integrated pain into their self-concept.

La communication de la douleur et de l'incapacité au sein des couples dont l'un des partenaires souffre de douleur persistante

Au cours des dernières années, il a été démontré que la façon dont la douleur est communiquée, par l’entremise de comportements de douleur, est associée à l’incapacité auto-rapportée et à la trajectoire de chronicité des individus souffrant de douleur persistante. Cependant, très peu de recherches ont investigué le lien entre la perception de la douleur dans le couple et la trajectoire de chronicité des individus souffrant de douleur persistante. Dans le cadre de cette thèse, trois études ont été réalisées afin de mieux comprendre les facteurs impliqués dans la communication de la douleur au sein de couples dont l’un des partenaires souffrait de douleur persistante. Une première étude a été réalisée afin de valider une version francophone du « Pain Disability Index (PDI) », un questionnaire développé pour évaluer l’incapacité reliée à la douleur persistante. Comme attendu, les résultats indiquent que cette version du PDI reproduit la structure factorielle de la version originale du PDI et présente une bonne fidélité et validité. Une autre étude a été réalisée auprès de couples dont l’un des partenaires souffre de douleur persistante afin d’évaluer les corrélats de la justesse empathique, d’explorer la relation entre la justesse empathique reliée à la douleur et différentes variables associées à l’adaptation du patient et du conjoint et enfin d’explorer la relation entre la justesse empathique reliée à la douleur et des variables relationnelles. Les résultats suggèrent que de façon générale, la justesse empathique est associée à des résultats négatifs chez les patients souffrant de douleur persistante et ne semble pas un corrélat important de la satisfaction conjugale. Enfin, une dernière étude a été réalisée afin de comprendre l’influence de la concordance des pensées catastrophiques dans le couple sur l’émission de comportements de douleur et sur la perception de la douleur et de l’incapacité lors d’une tâche physiquement exigeante. Il a été trouvé que les participants ayant un niveau élevé de pensées catastrophiques, qui étaient en relation avec un conjoint ayant un faible niveau de pensées catastrophiques, ont émis plus de comportements de douleur que tous les autres groupes. Ces résultats suggèrent que les personnes souffrant de douleur persistante ayant un niveau élevé de pensées catastrophiques peuvent avoir besoin d’augmenter le « volume » de la communication de la douleur afin de compenser pour la tendance des conjoints ayant un faible niveau de pensées catastrophiques à sous-estimer les signaux de douleur. En résumé, puisque l’émission de comportements de douleur est associée à l’incapacité auto-rapportée des individus souffrant de douleur persistante, il est possible que toute situation qui contribue à une augmentation des comportements de douleur, contribuera également à un niveau d’incapacité plus élevé. Ainsi, d’un point de vue clinique, les interventions qui amènent le conjoint à faire de l’écoute active et à valider la personne souffrante, pourraient réduire la présence des comportements de douleur et potentiellement avoir un impact sur le niveau d’incapacité des personnes souffrant de douleur persistante.

La douleur chez les adolescents et les jeunes adultes : interaction entre les styles d'attachement et la fonction sociale du catastrophisme

Thèse numérisée par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal