Greetings: 50 years of Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission–Radiation Effects Research Foundation studies

The Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission was established in Hiroshima in 1947 and in Nagasaki in 1948 under the auspices of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences to initiate a long-term and comprehensive epidemiological and genetic study of the atomic bomb survivors. It was replaced in 1975 by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation which is a nonprofit Japanese foundation binationally managed and supported with equal funding by the governments of Japan and the United States. Thanks to the cooperation of the survivors and the contributions of a multitude of scientists, these studies flourish to this day in what must be the most successful long-term research collaboration between the two countries. Although these studies are necessarily limited to the effects of acute, whole-body, mixed gamma-neutron radiation from the atom bombs, their comprehensiveness and duration make them the most definitive descriptions of the late effects of radiation in humans. For this reason, the entire world relies heavily on these data to set radiation standards. As vital as the study results are, they still represent primarily the effects of radiation on older survivors. Another decade or two should correct this deficiency and allow us to measure definitively the human risk of heritable mutation from radiation. We look to the worldwide radiation and risk community as well as to the survivors who have contributed so much to what has been done already to accomplish this goal.

The Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission in retrospect

For 50 years, the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC) and its successor, the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF), have conducted epidemiological and genetic studies of the survivors of the atomic bombs and of their children. This research program has provided the primary basis for radiation health standards. Both ABCC (1947–1975) and RERF (1975 to date) have been a joint enterprise of the United States (through the National Academy of Sciences) and of Japan. ABCC began in devastated, occupied Japan. Its mission had to be defined and refined. Early research revealed the urgent need for long term study. In 1946, a Directive of President Truman enjoined the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences to develop the program. By 1950, ABCC staff exceeded 1,000, and clinical and genetic studies were underway. Budgetary difficulties and other problems almost forced closure in 1953. In 1955, the Francis Report led to a unified epidemiological study. Much progress was made in the next decade, but changing times required founding of a binational nonprofit organization (RERF) with equal participation by Japan and the United States. New programs have been developed and existing ones have been extended in what is the longest continuing health survey ever undertaken.

Statistical analysis of the medical effects of the atomic bombs : from the report of the Joint Commission for the Investigation of the Effects of the Atomic Bomb in Japan /

Supplement to National nuclear energy ser., Div. 8, v. 8.

Hematological investigation of the atomic bomb sufferers in Hiroshima and Nagasaki City /

"Kyoto University."

Public reaction to the atomic bomb and world affairs; a nation-wide survey of attitudes and information.

Cover title.

The atomic bomb,

"Special edition."

Atomic energy in war and peace,

Mode of access: Internet.

Atomic warfare defense. Final draft. Rev. 1 July 1956.

Loose-leaf.

Desolació i pèrdua d'identitat : anàlisi de Pluja Negra i Flors d'Estiu

La bomba atòmica "representa la perfección del hombre por su parte 'malvada'. Ya no podemos ser más malvados, inteligentes y defensivos" (Sloterdijk, P.; 2003. p. 218 ). Aquesta és la reflexió de Peter Sloterdijk sobre la humanitat que ha provocat aquesta barbàrie, sent conscient que aquesta no pot ser més maligna ni provocar més dolor, després de destruir conscientment una ciutat sencera junt amb els seus habitants innocents. Però com es van sentir els hibakusha, supervivents de l'atac nuclear, i a què van quedar reduïts els ciutadans d'Hiroshima i de Nagasaki, havent patit aquesta maldat en la pròpia pell? Després d'aquesta tragèdia, molts d'aquells que van sobreviure van decidir explicar la seva experiència, donant lloc al conegut com genbaku bungaku o literatura de les bombes atòmiques. En aquest estudi hem escollit dues de les obres més importants del gènere per tal d'analitzar com aquesta vivència va afectar a les seves víctimes. En primer lloc, hem analitzat Flors d'Estiu, de Tamiki Hara, primer relat en ser publicat que, en poc més de vint pàgines, descriu l'infern viscut pel propi autor i com aquesta visió de l'apocalipsi i el sofriment absolut el va marca per sempre més. En segon lloc, hem analitzat Pluja Negra, escrita per Mabusi Ibuse, autor que, tot i no haver sigut testimoni directe de la tragèdia, va aconseguir copsar el sentiment dels hibakusha, escribint una de les millors novel·les del gènere. Per tal d'estudiar les obres hem seguit un camí del general al particular. Analitzant el context històric, ens hem pogut fer una idea de què va significar la postguerra, des de la política sota la guia nord-americana a la reconstrucció econòmica i també una societat que, perdent-ho gairebé tot, va haver de tornar a començar. Després, hem volgut endinsar-nos en la literatura del període, analitzant, junt amb el propi genbaku bungaku, dos dels gèneres més importants, el burai ha o escola decadent, i el nikutai bunaku o literatura de la carn. Finalment, hem analitzat les pròpies obres, veient com els textos es veuen impregnats de tristesa i confusió. Després de veure com tota la seva vida s'esmicolava en qüestió de segons, els protagonistes d'aquests dos textos queden totalment desolats, veient com ho han perdut tot, des de la seva identitat fins la seva esperança en la pròpia humanitat.

La représentation du Japon d'après-guerre dans le kaiju eiga

Mémoire numérisé par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal

Texto-coisa, poema-objeto: a políedrica p(r)oesia de Murilo Mendes e Francis Ponge

Pós-graduação em Estudos Literários - FCLAR

Information bias and lifetime mortality risks of radiation-induced cancer

Additive and multiplicative models of relative risk were used to measure the effect of cancer misclassification and DS86 random errors on lifetime risk projections in the Life Span Study (LSS) of Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors. The true number of cancer deaths in each stratum of the cancer mortality cross-classification was estimated using sufficient statistics from the EM algorithm. Average survivor doses in the strata were corrected for DS86 random error ($\sigma$ = 0.45) by use of reduction factors. Poisson regression was used to model the corrected and uncorrected mortality rates with covariates for age at-time-of-bombing, age at-time-of-death and gender. Excess risks were in good agreement with risks in RERF Report 11 (Part 2) and the BEIR-V report. Bias due to DS86 random error typically ranged from $-$15% to $-$30% for both sexes, and all sites and models. The total bias, including diagnostic misclassification, of excess risk of nonleukemia for exposure to 1 Sv from age 18 to 65 under the non-constant relative projection model was $-$37.1% for males and $-$23.3% for females. Total excess risks of leukemia under the relative projection model were biased $-$27.1% for males and $-$43.4% for females. Thus, nonleukemia risks for 1 Sv from ages 18 to 85 (DRREF = 2) increased from 1.91%/Sv to 2.68%/Sv among males and from 3.23%/Sv to 4.02%/Sv among females. Leukemia excess risks increased from 0.87%/Sv to 1.10%/Sv among males and from 0.73%/Sv to 1.04%/Sv among females. Bias was dependent on the gender, site, correction method, exposure profile and projection model considered. Future studies that use LSS data for U.S. nuclear workers may be downwardly biased if lifetime risk projections are not adjusted for random and systematic errors. (Supported by U.S. NRC Grant NRC-04-091-02.) ^