Ventilación mecanica y uso de oxígeno en prematuros tratados con citrato de cafeina o aminofilina

Las consecuencias de la inmadurez orgánica junto con las dificultades en la adaptación a la vida extrauterina, traen consigo difíciles retos y altos costos, referidos en lo económico y en las vidas humanas dentro de las unidades de recién nacidos: cientos de neonatos fallecen por las complicaciones asociadas a la prematuridad. Las complicaciones respiratorias, ocupan el primer lugar de todos estos problemas y es un enorme reto el hallar estrategias que logren rápidamente la independencia y autonomía de la mecánica respiratoria del prematuro, lo que incluye el menor tiempo posible del uso de oxígeno, pues se sabe de las consecuencias negativas e irreversibles de la ventilación mecánica sobre la arquitectura pulmonar y el estado hemodinámico, así como la toxicidad del oxígeno sobre los pulmones mismos y la retina (displasia broncopulmonar y retinopatía).

Cafeina vs aminofilina para la apnea del prematuro: estudio randomizado

La apnea del prematuro es una patología frecuente que se presenta en el 85% de los recién nacidos menores de 34 semanas de edad gestacional y en el 95-100% de los menores de 28 semanas. Con respecto al peso al nacer, se manifiesta en el 92% de los de peso menor a 1250 gramos y en el 50% de los de peso menor a 1500 gramos. Desde 2003, se aprobó en Colombia el uso de citrato de cafeína para la prevención y el tratamiento de la apnea del prematuro, basados en la evidencia. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio de interención simple comparando el citrato de cafeína con la aminofilina para la prevención y manejo de la apnea en pretérminos menores de 35 semanas de edad. Resultados: Se incluyeron 118 recién nacidos pretérminos de los cuales 18,6% fueron menores de 28 semanas, 79,7% de 34 semanas y dos 1,7% mayores o iguales a 34,1 semanas. 56 neonatos recibieron citrato de cafeína. De éstos, 33,9% de forma profiláctica y 66,1%, terapéutica; 28 (23,7%) recibieron aminofilina y 34 (28,8%) no recibieron ninguno de los dos medicamentos. El citrato de cafeína mostró menos efectos secundarios comparado con aminofilina (p <0,01). Discusión: El citrato de cafeína, administrado en forma profiláctica o terapéutica, mostró resultados superiores, estadísticamente significativos, en comparación con aminofilina y con los controles sin tratamiento, para la prevención y el tratamiento de la apnea del prematuro, presentando, además, menores efectos secundarios.

Respostas endócrinas, metabólicas, cardíacas e hematológicas de eqüinos submetidos ao exercício intenso e à administração de cafeína, aminofilina e clembuterol

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Thermoanalytical study of purine derivatives compounds

Os métodos térmicos em análises estão sendo atualmente muito utilizados nas investigações cientificas. Neste trabalho a termogravimetria-análise térmica diferencial simultânea (TG-DTA), difratometria de raios X pelo método do pó, espectroscopia de absorção na região do infravermelho foram utilizadas para estudar os compostos derivados da purina. Sendo estes: aminofilina. teofilina, cafeína e ácido úrico. Os resultados forneceram informações com respeito à estabilidade térmica e decomposição térmica sobre esses compostos.

Biological and physicochemical stability of ceftazidime and aminophylline on glucose parenteral solution

Ceftazidime is a broad spectrum antibiotic administered mainly by the parenteral route, and it is especially effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The period of time in which serum levels exceed the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is an important pharmacodynamic parameter for its efficacy. One of the forms to extend this period is to administer the antibiotic by continuous infusion, after prior dilution in a Parenteral Solution (PS). The present work assessed the stability of ceftazidime in 5% glucose PS for 24 hours, combined or not with aminophylline, through High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). The physicochemical evaluation was accompanied by in vitro antimicrobial activity compared MIC test in the 24-hour period. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the microorganisms chosen for the MIC comparison. The HPLC analysis confirmed ceftazidime and aminophylline individual stability on PS, while the MIC values were slightly higher than the mean described in the literature. When both drugs were associated in the same PS, the ceftazidime concentration by HPLC decreased 25% after 24 hours. Not only did the MIC values show high loss of antibiotic activity within the same period, but also altered MIC values immediately after the preparation, which was not detected by HPLC. Our results indicate that this drug combination is not compatible, even if used right away, and that PS might not be the best vehicle for ceftazidime, emphasizing the importance of the MIC evaluation for drug interactions.

Biological and physicochemical stability of ceftazidime and aminophylline on glucose parenteral solution

Ceftazidime is a broad spectrum antibiotic administered mainly by the parenteral route, and it is especially effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The period of time in which serum levels exceed the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is an important pharmacodynamic parameter for its efficacy. One of the forms to extend this period is to administer the antibiotic by continuous infusion, after prior dilution in a Parenteral Solution (PS). The present work assessed the stability of ceftazidime in 5% glucose PS for 24 hours, combined or not with aminophylline, through High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). The physicochemical evaluation was accompanied by in vitro antimicrobial activity compared MIC test in the 24-hour period. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the microorganisms chosen for the MIC comparison. The HPLC analysis confirmed ceftazidime and aminophylline individual stability on PS, while the MIC values were slightly higher than the mean described in the literature. When both drugs were associated in the same PS, the ceftazidime concentration by HPLC decreased 25% after 24 hours. Not only did the MIC values show high loss of antibiotic activity within the same period, but also altered MIC values immediately after the preparation, which was not detected by HPLC. Our results indicate that this drug combination is not compatible, even if used right away, and that PS might not be the best vehicle for ceftazidime, emphasizing the importance of the MIC evaluation for drug interactions.