Annual report of the Wisconsin Central Railway Company.

Title from cover.

Indenture between The St. Catharines and Niagara Central Railway Company and Samuel DeVeaux Woodruff

Indenture of deed of land situate between The St. Catharines and Niagara Central Railway Company and Samuel DeVeaux Woodruff of St. Catharines regarding parts of Lots no. 12 and 13 30 in the 8th Concession of the Township of Grantham. This was registered at Merritton on Feb. 2, 1891 – instrument no. 1021, Aug. 16, 1890.

Plan for the reorganization of the Wisconsin Central Railroad Company, submitted to the bondholders, by vote of the stockholders, at their annual meeting, May 29, 1879.

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual report of the president and directors of the Northern Central Railway Company to the stockholders.

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual Report of the Iowa Central Railway Company

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual report

1909/10-1932 include reports for the Wisconsin Central Railway Company which was leased Apr. 1, 1909, and operated as the Chicago Division of the Soo Line System

Report to the President by the Emergency Board appointed February 8, 1945 under the provisions of the Railway Labor Act : to investigate and report in respect to the dispute between the Central of Georgia Railway Company and certain of its employees represented by the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen. February 24, 1945.

Signed: H. Nathan Swaim, chairman, Ridgley P. Melvin, Russell Wolfe.

The Milwaukee Street Railway Company to Central Trust Company of New York : mortgage or deed of trust.

Cover title.

Final hearing on railway valuation in Wisconsin for assessment for 1903 on September 13th, 1904 : Chicago & North Western Railway Company, Chicago Burlington & Quincy Railway Company, Chicago Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, Chicago St. Paul Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company.

Mode of access: Internet.

Report of Messrs. Johnson and Wood on a central line of railway into Scotland made by them to the directors of the Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Carlisle Railway Company.

Mode of access: Internet.

In Equity no. 169. In the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California : the Equitable Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Complainant, against Western Pacific Railway Company, Chester L. Hovey, as Receiver of Boca and Loyalton Railroad Company, and Mercantile Trust Company of San Francisco, as Trustee, Defendants, and Central Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Intervening Defendant and Cross-complainant.

[V.1.] Proceedings on Master's sale -- [v.2.] Decree of forclosure and sale -- [v.3.] Ancillary decree of foreclosure and sale.

The Mystery of Privity: Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada v Robinson (1915)

This article examines a little known decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada v Robinson (1915). The examination is historical and it provides a different insight into the understanding of privity of contract, a doctrine central to contract law. The examination reveals a process of trans-Atlantic legal migration in which English law was applied to resolve an Ontario case. The nature of the resolution is surprising because it appears to conflict with the better known decision of the House of Lords, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company, Limited v Selfridge and Company, Limited, which a similarly constituted panel delivered in the same week. This article argues that there was a greater malleability in the resolution of cases concerned with privity than was thought to have existed. It is also argued that the power of Canadian railway capitalism is a significant factor in understanding the legal resolution of the case. Finally, it the article considers the use of English and American precedents relevant to the case. The application of English precedents to the case led to a resolution not entirely befitting Canadian conditions.

Clippings - Road Allowances, Lock 2 Bridge, Toronto Railway Company, St. Davids' History

Clipping regarding the original road allowance which was part of Mr. Woodruff’s property, n.d. Clipping regarding the Lock 2 Bridge. This is a letter to the editor of the Journal from Calvin Phelps of Lockport, Nov. 13, 1889. Clipping entitled “Settled beyond a Dispute”: a letter to the Editor of the Star from J. G. Currie regarding the road allowance in the 5th Concession of Grantham, Nov. 16, 1889. Clipping entitled “That Old Road Allowance” which is a rebuttal to Mr. Currie’s letter, [1889] 2 newspaper clippings regarding: “Reg. vs. Toronto Railway Company���. These 2 articles are glued to a piece of paper. Beneath the newspaper articles is the name M. Chambers, Nov. 18, 1898. Notes regarding the clippings are enclosed with the articles. These notes and written on the back of “Pattison, Collier and Shaw Barristers, Solicitors, Etc.” stationary (notes are 2 pages, handwritten), Nov. 18, 1898. Clipping entitled “History on the Site: St. Davids’ Students Learn Lessons where Events Occurred” (2 copies), n.d.

Michigan Central Railway to S.D. Woodruff

Letter from the Michigan Central Railway to S.D. Woodruff regarding the construction of a fence, June 16, 1883.