Report of the Department of Conservation and Development.

Includes the report of the Division of Reclamation, 1921/1922-1923/1924; and: the Division of Columbia Basin Survey, 1921/1922.

Biennial report of the Department of Conservation and Development of the State of North Carolina [serial].

Title from cover.

Preparing for and adapting to climate change impacts: Next steps for the Washington state department of National Resources Aquatic Resources Program

In response to a growing body of research on projected climate change impacts to Washington State���s coastal areas, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Aquatic Resources Program (the Program) initiated a climate change preparedness effort in 2009 via the development of a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (the Strategy)i. The Strategy answers the question “What are the next steps that the Program can take to begin preparing for and adapting to climate change impacts in Washington’s coastal areas?” by considering how projected climate change impacts may effect: (1) Washington’s state-owned aquatic landsii, (2) the Program’s management activities, and (3) DNR’s statutorily established guidelines for managing Washington’s state-owned aquatic lands for the benefit of the public. The Program manages Washington’s state-owned aquatic lands according to the guidelines set forth in Revised Code of Washington 79-105-030, which stipulates that DNR must manage state-owned aquatic lands in a manner which provides a balance of the following public benefits: (1) Encouraging direct public uses and access; (2) Fostering water-dependent uses; (3) Ensuring environmental protection; (4) Utilizing renewable resources. (RCW 79-105-030) The law also stipulates that generating revenue in a manner consistent with these four benefits is a public benefit (RCW 79-105-030). Many of the next steps identified in the Strategy build off of recommendations provided by earlier climate change preparation and adaptation efforts in Washington State, most notably those provided by the Preparation and Adaptation Working Group, which were convened by Washington State Executive Order 70-02 in 2007, and those made in the Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment (Climate Impacts Group, 2009). (PDF contains 4 pages)

Biennial report of the Department of Agriculture of the state of Washington to the Governor.

Issue for Sept. 30, 1932 has title: Tenth biennial report of the Department of Agriculture and fifth biennial report of the Department of Conservation and Development to the Governor.

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Albany, New York.

Mode of access: Internet.

The Michigan forest fire experiment station: what it is and what it is doing. Division of field administration, Michigan Department of conservation and Lake states forest experiment station, Forest service, United States Department of agriculture cooperating. 1932.

Mode of access: Internet.

Oregon laws relating to agriculture from Oregon revised statutes with 1955 amendments; administered by the State Department of Agriculture and including some agricultural laws not administered by the department but related to or associated with department responsibilities.

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual report - Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

Report year ends September 30.

Biennial report of the North Carolina State Department of Archives and History [serial].

Issues for 1946/1948- have title: Biennial report of the North Carolina Department of Archives and History.

Occupational mortality in Washington State, 1950-1971 /

Mode of access: Internet.

The Rocky Road of Social Sustainability : The Impact of Integrated Biodiversity Conservation and Development on the Local Realities in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar

The objective of this study is to examine the social impacts of the integrated conservation and development project (ICDP) aimed at biodiversity conservation and local socio-economic development in the Ranomafana National Park (RNP), Madagascar. Furthermore, the study explores social sustainability and justice of the ICDP in Ranomafana. This ethnographically informed impact study uses of various field methods. The research material used consists of observation, interviews (key-person and focus group), school children's writings, official statistics and project documents. Fieldwork was conducted in three phases in 2001, 2002 and 2004 in twelve villages around the park, as well as in neighbouring areas of Ranomafana. However, four of those twelve villages were chosen for closer study. This study consists of five independent articles and a concluding chapter. Social impacts were studied through reproductive health indicators as well as a life security approach. Equity and distribution of benefits and drawbacks of ICDP were analysed and the actors related to the conservation in Ranomafana were identified. The children and adolescents' environmental views were also examined. The reproductive health indicators studied showed a poor state of reproductive health in the park area. Moreover, the existing social capital in the villages seemed to be fragmented due to economic difficulties that were partly caused by the conservation regulations. The ICDP in Ranomafana did not pay attention to the heterogeneity of the affected communities even though the local beneficiaries of the ICDP varied according to their ethnicity, living place, wealth, social position and gender. In addition, various conservation actors (local people in various groups, local authorities, tourist business owners, conservation NGOs and scientists) contest their interests over the forest, conservation and its related activities. This study corroborates the same type of evidence and conclusions discussed in other similar cases elsewhere: so called social conservation programmes still cannot meet the needs of the people living near the protected areas; on the contrary, they even have a reverse impact on the people's lives. A fundamental misunderstood assumption in the conservation process in Ranomafana was to consider the local people as a problem for biodiversity conservation. Major reasons for the failure of the ICDP in Ranomafana include a lack of local institutions that would have been able to communicate as equals with the conservation NGOs as well as to transfer the tradition of the authoritarian governance in conservation management together with the over-appreciation of scientific biodiversity, and lack of will to understand the local people's rights to use the forest for their livelihoods.

A state monopoly of workmen's compensation insurance plus a political administration of same equals the ultimate bankruptcy of the whole scheme : the state of Washington after five years' practical experience has solved this problem; examinations by the Department of Auditor of State Bureau of Inspection and Supervision of Public Offices; startling disclosures and denunciations in the language and logic of the state examiners /

Mode of access: Internet.

Draft state action plan : as submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Program year 1996 covers April 1, 1996-May 31, 1997.

Draft state consolidated plan, action plan : as submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development /

Each vol. includes a 1-year action plan.

Draft State of Illinois consolidated plan : as submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Each issue includes first year of action plan (e.g., issue for 2000/2004 includes action plan for 2000).