La dinámica sindical en el subterráneo de Buenos Aires en un contexto de diversidad sindical : un análisis a partir de las paritarias de 2012

Después de haber mantenido una conflictiva relación durante varios años con la conducción de su gremio, la Unión Tranviarios Automotor (UTA), una fracción mayoritaria de los trabajadores del subterráneo de Buenos Aires decidió –hacia 2008– escindirse del mismo y conformar un nuevo sindicato, la Asociación Gremial de Trabajadores del Subterráneo y el Premetro (AGTSyP). De esta manera, se configuró en este espacio de trabajo una situación original de diversidad sindical. Sobre la diversidad sindical existen diversos posicionamientos. Probablemente, la lectura más difundida sobre el tema es la que sostiene que la presencia de más de un gremio en un determinado ámbito laboral debilita a la fuerza sindical frente al Estado y los empresarios. Sin embargo, existen otras interpretaciones que argumentan que, si bien la misma es deseable, no genera necesariamente el debilitamiento del Trabajo frente al Capital y el Estado. En el presente artículo nos proponemos analizar la dinámica sindical del subterráneo de Buenos Aires en un contexto de diversidad sindical, interrogándonos especialmente sobre los efectos que esta situación tiene para la fuerza de trabajo. En esta dirección, analizaremos el extenso conflicto relativo a las paritarias de 2012.

Destellos de un nuevo sujeto : Los conflictos obreros en los saladeros y el nacimiento de la clase obrera entrerriana (1854-1868)

El objetivo del trabajo es demostrar la existencia de conflictos obreros en Entre Ríos, a partir de las luchas salariales en los saladeros entre 1854 y 1868. Colateralmente, cuestionamos las fechas de génesis del movimiento obrero argentino. La reconstrucción de las luchas se realizó con una gran variedad de fuentes: crónicas de viajeros, documentación oficial y, principalmente, el análisis epistolar de los establecimientos saladeriles de Justo José de Urquiza. A partir de la evidencia empírica, que muestra los enfrentamientos entre los trabajadores y patrones, sostenemos la existencia de un proletariado en formación. Se analizarán las estrategias de luchas y los mecanismos patronales para superar las situaciones planteadas

Destellos de un nuevo sujeto : Los conflictos obreros en los saladeros y el nacimiento de la clase obrera entrerriana (1854-1868)

El objetivo del trabajo es demostrar la existencia de conflictos obreros en Entre Ríos, a partir de las luchas salariales en los saladeros entre 1854 y 1868. Colateralmente, cuestionamos las fechas de génesis del movimiento obrero argentino. La reconstrucción de las luchas se realizó con una gran variedad de fuentes: crónicas de viajeros, documentación oficial y, principalmente, el análisis epistolar de los establecimientos saladeriles de Justo José de Urquiza. A partir de la evidencia empírica, que muestra los enfrentamientos entre los trabajadores y patrones, sostenemos la existencia de un proletariado en formación. Se analizarán las estrategias de luchas y los mecanismos patronales para superar las situaciones planteadas

Destellos de un nuevo sujeto : Los conflictos obreros en los saladeros y el nacimiento de la clase obrera entrerriana (1854-1868)

El objetivo del trabajo es demostrar la existencia de conflictos obreros en Entre Ríos, a partir de las luchas salariales en los saladeros entre 1854 y 1868. Colateralmente, cuestionamos las fechas de génesis del movimiento obrero argentino. La reconstrucción de las luchas se realizó con una gran variedad de fuentes: crónicas de viajeros, documentación oficial y, principalmente, el análisis epistolar de los establecimientos saladeriles de Justo José de Urquiza. A partir de la evidencia empírica, que muestra los enfrentamientos entre los trabajadores y patrones, sostenemos la existencia de un proletariado en formación. Se analizarán las estrategias de luchas y los mecanismos patronales para superar las situaciones planteadas

Destellos de un nuevo sujeto : Los conflictos obreros en los saladeros y el nacimiento de la clase obrera entrerriana (1854-1868)

El objetivo del trabajo es demostrar la existencia de conflictos obreros en Entre Ríos, a partir de las luchas salariales en los saladeros entre 1854 y 1868. Colateralmente, cuestionamos las fechas de génesis del movimiento obrero argentino. La reconstrucción de las luchas se realizó con una gran variedad de fuentes: crónicas de viajeros, documentación oficial y, principalmente, el análisis epistolar de los establecimientos saladeriles de Justo José de Urquiza. A partir de la evidencia empírica, que muestra los enfrentamientos entre los trabajadores y patrones, sostenemos la existencia de un proletariado en formación. Se analizarán las estrategias de luchas y los mecanismos patronales para superar las situaciones planteadas

Problems and policies of dispute settlement and wage stabilization during World War II.

Mode of access: Internet.

Arbitration of dispute between the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. and Switchmen's Union of North America : NMB case A-3849 : history of the 40-hour week, wage and rules movement, 1948 to 1951.

Cover title.

Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential

This paper presents the results of a structural equation model (SEM) for describing and quantifying the fundamental factors that affect contract disputes between owners and contractors in the construction industry. Through this example, the potential impact of SEM analysis in construction engineering and management research is illustrated. The purpose of the specific model developed in this research is to explain how and why contract related construction problems occur. This study builds upon earlier work, which developed a disputes potential index, and the likelihood of construction disputes was modeled using logistic regression. In this earlier study, questionnaires were completed on 159 construction projects, which measured both qualitative and quantitative aspects of contract disputes, management ability, financial planning, risk allocation, and project scope definition for both owners and contractors. The SEM approach offers several advantages over the previously employed logistic regression methodology. The final set of structural equations provides insight into the interaction of the variables that was not apparent in the original logistic regression modeling methodology.

Alternative dispute resolution : are apology and forgiveness simply two sides of the one coin?

Alternative dispute resolution (a.d.r.) processes are entrenched in western style legal systems. Forms of dispute resolution are utilised within schools and health systems; built in to commercial contracts; found in workplaces, clubs and organisations; and accepted in general day-to-day community disputes. The a.d.r. literature includes references to ‘apology’, but is largely silent on ‘forgiveness’. Where an apology is offered as part of a dispute resolution process, practice suggests that formalised ‘forgiveness’ rarely follows. Mediators may agree there is a meaningful place for apology in dispute resolution processes, but are most unlikely to support a view that forgiveness, as a conscious act, has an equivalent place. Yet, if forgiveness is not limited to the ‘pardoning of an offence’, but includes a ‘giving up of resentment’, or the relinquishing of a grudge, then forgiveness may play an underestimated role in dispute management. In the context of some day-to-day dispute management practice, this paper questions whether forgiveness should follow an apology; and concludes that meaningful resolutions can be reached without any formal element of ‘forgiveness’ or absolution. However, dispute management practitioners need to be aware of the latent role other aspects of forgiveness may play for the disputing parties.

Ending the life of the act/omission dispute: Causation in withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining measures

My aim in this paper is to challenge the increasingly common view in the literature that the law on end of life decision making is in disarray and is in need of urgent reform. My argument is that this assessment of the law is based on assumptions about the relationship between the identity of the defendant and their conduct, and about the nature of causation, which, on examination, prove to be indefensible. I then provide a clarification of the relationship between causation and omissions which proves that the current legal position does not need modification, at least on the grounds that are commonly advanced for the converse view. This enables me, in conclusion, to clarify important conceptual and moral differences between withholding, refusing and withdrawing life-sustaining measures on the one hand, and assisted suicide and euthanasia, on the other.

An evaluation of the sustainability of agreements reached through mediations conducted by the dispute resolution centres of the Department of Justice and Attorney General, Queensland between 1999 to 2003

In 1990 the Dispute Resolution Centres Act, 1990 (Qld) (the Act) was passed by the Queensland Parliament. In the second reading speech for the Dispute Resolution Centres Bill on May 1990 the Hon Dean Wells stated that the proposed legislation would make mediation services available “in a non-coercive, voluntary forum where, with the help of trained mediators, the disputants will be assisted towards their own solutions to their disputes, thereby ensuring that the result is acceptable to the parties” (Hansard, 1990, 1718). It was recognised at that time that a method for resolving disputes was necessary for which “the conventional court system is not always equipped to provide lasting resolution” (Hansard, 1990, 1717). In particular, the lasting resolution of “disputes between people in continuing relationships” was seen as made possible through the new legislation; for example, “domestic disputes, disputes between employees, and neighbourhood disputes relating to such issues as overhanging tree branches, dividing fences, barking dogs, smoke, noise and other nuisances are occurring continually in the community” (Hansard, 1990, 1717). The key features of the proposed form of mediation in the Act were articulated as follows: “attendance of both parties at mediation sessions is voluntary; a party may withdraw at any time; mediation sessions will be conducted with as little formality and technicality as possible; the rules of evidence will not apply; any agreement reached is not enforceable in any court; although it could be made so if the parties chose to proceed that way; and the provisions of the Act do not affect any rights or remedies that a party to a dispute has apart from the Act” (Hansard, 1990, 1718). Since the introduction of the Act, the Alternative Dispute Resolution Branch of the Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney General has offered mediation services through, first the Community Justice Program (CJP), and then the Dispute Resolution Centres (DRCs) for a range of family, neighbourhood, workplace and community disputes. These services have mirrored those available through similar government agencies in other states such as the Community Justice Centres of NSW and the Victorian Dispute Resolution Centres. Since 1990, mediation has become one of the fastest growing forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Sourdin has commented that "In addition to the growth in court-based and community-based dispute resolution schemes, ADR has been institutionalised and has grown within Australia and overseas” (2005, 14). In Australia, in particular, the development of ADR service provision “has been assisted by the creation and growth of professional organisations such as the Leading Edge Alternative Dispute Resolvers (LEADR), the Australian Commercial Dispute Centres (ACDC), Australian Disputes Resolution Association (ADRA), Conflict Resolution Network, and the Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia (IAMA)” (Sourdin, 2005, 14). The increased emphasis on the use of ADR within education contexts (particularly secondary and tertiary contexts) has “also led to an increasing acceptance and understanding of (ADR) processes” (Sourdin, 2005, 14). Proponents of the mediation process, in particular, argue that much of its success derives from the inherent flexibility and creativity of the agreements reached through the mediation process and that it is a relatively low cost option in many cases (Menkel-Meadow, 1997, 417). It is also accepted that one of the main reasons for the success of mediation can be attributed to the high level of participation by the parties involved and thus creating a sense of ownership of, and commitment to, the terms of the agreement (Boulle, 2005, 65). These characteristics are associated with some of the core values of mediation, particularly as practised in community-based models as found at the DRCs. These core values include voluntary participation, party self-determination and party empowerment (Boulle, 2005, 65). For this reason mediation is argued as being an effective approach to resolving disputes, that creates a lasting resolution of the issues. Evaluation of the mediation process, particularly in the context of the growth of ADR, has been an important aspect of the development of the process (Sourdin, 2008). Writing in 2005 for example, Boulle, states that “although there is a constant refrain for more research into mediation practice, there has been a not insignificant amount of mediation measurement, both in Australia and overseas” (Boulle, 2005, 575). The positive claims of mediation have been supported to a significant degree by evaluations of the efficiency and effectiveness of the process. A common indicator of the effectiveness of mediation is the settlement rate achieved. High settlement rates for mediated disputes have been found for Australia (Altobelli, 2003) and internationally (Alexander, 2003). Boulle notes that mediation agreement rates claimed by service providers range from 55% to 92% (Boulle, 2005, 590). The annual reports for the Alternative Dispute Resolution Branch of the Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney-General considered prior to the commencement of this study indicated generally achievement of an approximate settlement figure of 86% by the Queensland Dispute Resolution Centres. More recently, the 2008-2009 annual report states that of the 2291 civil dispute mediated in 2007-2008, 86% reached an agreement. Further, of the 2693 civil disputes mediated in 2008-2009, 73% reached an agreement. These results are noted in the report as indicating “the effectiveness of mediation in resolving disputes” and as reflecting “the high level of agreement achieved for voluntary mediations” (Annual Report, 2008-2009, online). Whilst the settlement rates for the DRCs are strong, parties are rarely contacted for long term follow-up to assess whether agreements reached during mediation lasted to the satisfaction of each party. It has certainly been the case that the Dispute Resolution Centres of Queensland have not been resourced to conduct long-term follow-up assessments of mediation agreements. As Wade notes, "it is very difficult to compare "success" rates” and whilst “politicians want the comparison studies (they) usually do not want the delay and expense of accurate studies" (1998, 114). To date, therefore, it is fair to say that the efficiency of the mediation process has been evaluated but not necessarily its effectiveness. Rather, the practice at the Queensland DRCs has been to evaluate the quality of mediation service provision and of the practice of the mediation process. This has occurred, for example, through follow-up surveys of parties' satisfaction rates with the mediation service. In most other respects it is fair to say that the Centres have relied on the high settlement rates of the mediation process as a sign of the effectiveness of mediation (Annual Reports 1991 - 2010). Research of the mediation literature conducted for the purpose of this thesis has also indicated that there is little evaluative literature that provides an in-depth analysis and assessment of the longevity of mediated agreements. Instead evaluative studies of mediation tend to assess how mediation is conducted, or compare mediation with other conflict resolution options, or assess the agreement rate of mediations, including parties' levels of satisfaction with the service provision of the dispute resolution service provider (Boulle, 2005, Chapter 16).

Lawyers' role options in family dispute resolution

Both family lawyers and family dispute resolution practitioners are“gatekeepers” to the family law system.In this article the authors explore,with reference to recent research, the characteristics shown to be present in successful collaborative relationships between these two groups of professionals. They then apply Rundle’s spectrum of contributions that lawyers can make to mediation to the family law context and explore the various role options for family lawyers in family dispute resolution.