A formal model of the Semantic Web Service Ontology (WSMO)

Semantic Web Service, one of the most significant research areas within the Semantic Web vision, has attracted increasing attention from both the research community and industry. The Web Service Modelling Ontology (WSMO) has been proposed as an enabling framework for the total/partial automation of the tasks (e.g., discovery, selection, composition, mediation, execution, monitoring, etc.) involved in both intra- and inter-enterprise integration of Web services. To support the standardisation and tool support of WSMO, a formal model of the language is highly desirable. As several variants of WSMO have been proposed by the WSMO community, which are still under development, the syntax and semantics of WSMO should be formally defined to facilitate easy reuse and future development. In this paper, we present a formal Object-Z formal model of WSMO, where different aspects of the language have been precisely defined within one unified framework. This model not only provides a formal unambiguous model which can be used to develop tools and facilitate future development, but as demonstrated in this paper, can be used to identify and eliminate errors present in existing documentation.

Adjusting WSMO API Reference Implementation to Support More Reliable Entity Persistence

* The research has been partially supported by INFRAWEBS - IST FP62003/IST/2.3.2.3 Research Project No. 511723 and “Technologies of the Information Society for Knowledge Processing and Management” - IIT-BAS Research Project No. 010061.

Sviluppo e verifica di un framework basato su logica computazionale per la selezione dinamica di web services tramite informazioni

La presenza sempre più massiccia di fornitori di servizi basati su web service ha portato in rilievo uno dei limiti di questo approccio, l’impossibilità di rendere automatizzabili i task di ricerca, invocazione e orchestrazione dei servizi. Il raggiungimento di questo obiettivo risulta impossibile a causa della mancanza di informazioni comprensibili ad una macchina attraverso le quali un agente software può effettuare delle scelte tra vari servizi esposti. Il fallimento della “ricerca intelligente” di un servizio pubblicato sta nella stessa modellazione dei servizi. I linguaggi attualmente disponibili permettono di modellare un servizio solo dal punto di vista sintattico. Definire le operazioni proposte, il tipo di parametri accettati e il tipo di output prodotto non è sufficiente a comprendere cosa il servizio può fare. I web services semantici consentono di superare questo limite fornendo uno stack semantico, il quale ha il compito di racchiudere le informazioni relative ai servizi, il loro funzionamento e gli obiettivi raggiungibili organizzando la conoscenza in ontologie. La formalizzazione dei modelli ontologici e la loro integrazione con i servizi esistenti è uno dei problemi più interessanti che ha catturato l’attenzione di numerosi studi di settore. Negli ultimi anni numerose sono state le soluzioni proposte. Tra queste si possono considerare due principali vie di sviluppo che hanno visto un’intensa attività sperimentale. Il primo scenario è volto a modellare in maniera formale la conoscenza legata ai servizi esposti, il secondo integra i servizi già esistenti con nuove strutture semantiche in modo da conservare le infrastrutture presenti. Entrambi i filoni hanno come scopo quello di fornire la conoscenza adatta a sistemi esperti che consentano di automatizzare la ricerca dei servizi in base ai desideri dei clienti, permettendo la loro composizione dinamica basata su un’interazione utile e indipendente dai protocolli che vincolano il trasporto delle informazioni.

FP6-ist INFRAWEBS European Research Project

Project Focus: The main INFRAWEBS project focus and objective is the development of an application-oriented software toolset for creating, maintaining and executing WSMO-based Semantic Web Services (SWS) within their whole life cycle. This next generation of tools and systems will enable software and service providers to build open and extensible development platforms for web service applications. These services will run on open standards and specifications, such as BPEL4WS, WSMO, WSMX, WSML, SPARQL, RDF, etc. In particular, they will be compliant with WSMO (Web Services Modelling Ontology), a W3C initiative in Semantic Web services.

INFRAWEBS Axiom Editor – A Graphical Ontology-Driven Tool for Creating Complex Logical Expressions

The current INFRAWEBS European research project aims at developing ICT framework enabling software and service providers to generate and establish open and extensible development platforms for Web Service applications. One of the concrete project objectives is developing a full-life-cycle software toolset for creating and maintaining Semantic Web Services (SWSs) supporting specific applications based on Web Service Modelling Ontology (WSMO) framework. According to WSMO, functional and behavioural descriptions of a SWS may be represented by means of complex logical expressions (axioms). The paper describes a specialized userfriendly tool for constructing and editing such axioms – INFRAWEBS Axiom Editor. After discussing the main design principles of the Editor, its functional architecture is briefly presented. The tool is implemented in Eclipse Graphical Environment Framework and Eclipse Rich Client Platform.

INFRAWEBS BPEL-Based Editor for Creating the Semantic Web Services Description

INFRAWEBS project [INFRAWEBS] considers usage of semantics for the complete lifecycle of Semantic Web processes, which represent complex interactions between Semantic Web Services. One of the main initiatives in the Semantic Web is WSMO framework, aiming at describing the various aspects related to Semantic Web Services in order to enable the automation of Web Service discovery, composition, interoperation and invocation. In the paper the conceptual architecture for BPEL-based INFRAWEBS editor is proposed that is intended to construct a part of WSMO descriptions of the Semantic Web Services. The semantic description of Web Services has to cover Data, Functional, Execution and QoS semantics. The representation of Functional semantics can be achieved by adding the service functionality to the process description. The architecture relies on a functional (operational) semantics of the Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (BPEL4WS) and uses abstract state machine (ASM) paradigm. This allows describing the dynamic properties of the process descriptions in terms of partially ordered transition rules and transforming them to WSMO framework.

A survey of semantic web services formalisms

The field of Semantic Web Services (SWS) has been recognized as one of the most promising areas of emergent research within the Semantic Web initiative, exhibiting an extensive commercial potential and attracting significant attention from both industry and the research community. Currently, there exist several different frameworks and languages for formally describing a Web Service: Web Ontology Language for Services (OWL-S), Web Service Modelling Ontology (WSMO) and Semantic Annotations for the Web Services Description Language (SAWSDL) are the most important approaches. To the inexperienced user, choosing the appropriate platform for a specific SWS application may prove to be challenging, given a lack of clear separation between the ideas promoted by the associated research communities. In this paper, we systematically compare OWL-S, WSMO and SAWSDL from various standpoints, namely, that of the service requester and provider as well as the broker-based view. The comparison is meant to help users to better understand the strengths and limitations of these different approaches to formalizing SWS, and to choose the most suitable solution for a given application. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

A survey of semantic web services formalisms

The field of Semantic Web Services (SWS) has been recognized as one of the most promising areas of emergent research within the Semantic Web (SW) initiative, exhibiting an extensive commercial potential, and attracting significant attention from both industry and the research community. Currently, there exist several different frameworks and languages for formally describing a Web Service: OWL-S (Web Ontology Language for Services), WSMO (Web Service Modeling Ontology) and SAWSDL (Semantic Annotations for the Web Services Description Language) are the most important approaches. To the inexperienced user, choosing the appropriate paradigm for a specific SWS application may prove to be challenging, given a lack of clear separation between the ideas promoted by the associated research communities. In this paper, we systematically compare OWL-S, WSMO and SAWSDL from various standpoints, namely that of the service requester and provider as well as the broker based view. The comparison is meant to help users to better understand the strengths and limitations of these different approaches to formalising SWS, and to choose the most suitable solution for a given use case. © 2013 IEEE.