SAV IX: muito além dos muros do CSM/MM

não disponível

Impact of International Norms on Criminal Justice Administration

This study is an attempt to look at the impact of international norms on the criminal justice administration in India. It has been confined to the criminal justice administration since it is here that the concept of sovereignty is affected the most. The study is intended to give a fair idea as to the position India holds in the matter of implementation of international norms in the area of criminal justice administration and the areas that require urgent attention. The study suggests that the country’s system is on the right track towards the implementation of the international norms. The position of law in India and the requirements under international norms with respect to criminal justice administration have been studied by considering the same at three stages – pre trial, trial and post trial stages. The question as to whether they comply with the international standards and the approaches of the court has been inquired into this study

Bibliographies in criminal justice : a selected bibliography /

Includes indexes.

The Role of general government elected officials in criminal justice.

Mode of access: Internet.

Is Inefficiency under control in the Justice Administration?

Efficiency in the administration of justice is found to increase over time, while the variation in the efficiency of the courts tended to remain low and fall over time. This would appear to be good news, at least for the case studied here: the civil courts of first instance in Spain between 2005 and 2009. Apart from the simple passing of time, the percentage of temporary judges in the system also determines some of the differences in efficiency between courts over time. Thus, we find that the greater the percentage of temporary judges, the lower is the efficiency of the courts. Overall, the average relative efficiency level for the period 2005 to 2009 was 97.46%, suggesting the matter is under control.

Death penalty [microform] : hearing before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, first session, July 16, 1987.

"Serial no. 142."

Affirmative action in Salt Lake's criminal justice agencies : a report /

Includes bibliographical references.

Criminal justice and democracy in the Western Hemisphere.

"April 1989."

Criminal justice agencies, in region 1: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont.

Prepared for the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, by the Bureau of the Census.

Criminal justice agencies in region 2: New Jersey, New York.

Prepared for the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, by the Bureau of the Census.

Criminal justice agencies, in region 3: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia.

Prepared for the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, by the Bureau of the Census.

Criminal justice agencies in region 6 /

"SD-2D-6"