The Virginia Constitutional Convention and its possibilities.

Mode of access: Internet.

Rules of the Constitutional Convention, 1901 : with lists of the stnading committees, the officers of the Convention, and a roll of the delegates.

Mode of access: Internet.

Memories of three score years and ten,

Mode of access: Internet.

Journal of the Constitutional Convention to revise and amend sec. 141 of the Constitution of Virginia held in the Old Hall of the House of Delegates in the State Capitol at Richmond, March 5, 6, 7, 1956.

Mode of access: Internet.

Journal of the Constitutional convention of the commonwealth of Virginia to amend the Constitution of Virginia for voting by certain members of the armed forces. Held in the old hall of the House of delegates in the state Capitol at Richmond April 30, May 1, 2, 22, 1945 [and]

J. Sinclair Brown, president of the convention

Proceedings and debates of the Virginia State Convention of 1829-1830.

Includes the constitution adopted Jan. 14, 1830.

Journal, acts and proceedings, of a general convention of the Commonwealth of Virginia, assembled in Richmond, on Monday, the fifth day of October, in the year of Our Lord one thousand eight hundred and twenty-nine.

"An amended constitution or form of government for Virginia. [Adopted January 14th, 1830]": p. 2-8, at end.

Álbum do Amazonas / photographias de F. A. Fidanza. --Album do Amazonas, 1901-1902 : no Governo de Sua Exª. Snr. Dr. Silvério Nery

Com dedicatória à Camara dos Deputados do Senador Joaquim José Pais da Silva Sarmento, 1900-1902(na página de rosto)

[2 lettres d'Alice de Monaco à Jules Massenet, 1901-[1902]]

f. 3-4 : daté d'après le contenu

Second International American Conference México: 1901-1902: Organization of the Conference, Projects, Reports, Motions, Debates and Resolutions

UANL

After the referendum: options for a constitutional convention

Whatever the result of Scotland’s independence referendum, careful constitutional thinking will be needed. If Scots vote Yes, Scotland will need a new constitution and the rest of the UK will have to rethink its governing structures. Even in the event of a No vote, everyone agrees that the shape of the Union will need to change over the coming years. This paper examines how such constitution-making should take place. It sets out the options, gathers evidence from around the world on how those options might work, and weighs the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative. It concludes that constitutional proposals in the UK should best be developed by a convention comprising a mixture of ordinary members of the public and politicians; these proposals should be put to a referendum. This approach, the paper argues, offers the best route to high-quality debate, stronger democratic engagement, and, ultimately, deeper legitimacy for our governing structures.