Reports of the United States Tax Court /

Reporters: Ella C. Thomas, Jan./Sept. 1970-; Mary T. Pittman, -19 ; John T. Fee, <1989->

Rules of practice before the Tax Court of the United States. Rev. to November 3, 1947.

Mode of access: Internet.

Rules of practice before the Tax Court of the United States. Rev. to December 15, 1948.

Mode of access: Internet.

Reports of the Tax Court of the United States.

Cumulation of the "advance parts" of the reports which are issued monthly as: United States. Tax Court. Reports. Cf. U.S. Superintendent of Documents. United States government publications monthly catalog. December 1943.

Tax court digest; a digest of all reported decisions and appealed memorandum opinions of the Board of Tax Appeals and Tax Court of the United States, from July 16, 1924 to date.

Tax Court digest: current report is issued with it, with separate numbering

Bilski v Kappos : The United States Supreme Court delivers mixed views on patenting non-physical inventions and business methods

The United States Supreme Court has handed down a once in a generation patent law decision that will have important ramifications for the patentability of non-physical methods, both internationally and in Australia. In Bilski v Kappos, the Supreme Court considered whether an invention must either be tied to a machine or apparatus, or transform an article into a different state or thing to be patentable. It also considered for the first time whether business methods are patentable subject matter. The decision will be of particular interest to practitioners who followed the litigation in Grant v Commissioner of Patents, a Federal Court decision in which a Brisbane-based inventor was denied a patent over a method of protecting an asset from the claims of creditors.

February 2010: United States Supreme Court Cases

http://digitalcommons.winthrop.edu/dacusdocsnews/1043/thumbnail.jpg

3.4 United States Supreme Court 1938

Gaines’ legal team, led by Houston, had faith in the justice system of the United States and anticipated getting a fair trial at the federal level. So far, all decisions had occurred in Missouri, a state with a segregated system.The fact that Gaines v Canada had reached the Supreme Court was promising indeed. It was rare that any case involving African-Americans would be considered by the highest court in the land. President Franklin D. Roosevelt had been appointing Justices that were more willing to consider cases concerned with civil rights. On November 9, 1938, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the Gaines v Canada case. The defense was unmoved by the rude treatment and made their presentation with professionalism and aplomb. Houston’s argument remained steadfast; not only was the state of Missouri’s statute concerning out-of-state tuition for blacks in violation of the 14th Amendment, but the very idea of segregation itself violated the Constitution. William Hogsett, the attorney for the University of Missouri, countered that the school was merely following state laws. The MU legal team was flustered as questions from the bench forced them to correct overstatements regarding Missouri’s “generosity to Negro students”. With crossed fingers and high hopes, the Gaines legal team rested their case and awaited the verdict. Meanwhile, Lloyd Gaines was still in Michigan. Lloyd held a W.P.A. job as a Civil Service Clerk and was in constant contact with his family and attorneys. His mood in his correspondence was hopeful and positive.

The eight hours day for wage earning women: United States Supreme Court upholds the California law : List of eight hours laws

National Consumers' League.

Rules of the United States District court for the Northern district of Iowa, including rules in Bankruptcy, as amended and revised to April 1, 1924.

Mode of access: Internet.

Rules of practice of the United States District court for the district of Arizona, in effect February 1, 1930.

Mode of access: Internet.

Rules of practice for the United States District court, Eastern district of Arkansas.

Mode of access: Internet.

Bankruptcy rules of the United States District court for the district of Colorado.

Mode of access: Internet.

Bankruptcy rules of the United States District court for the district of Idaho.

Mode of access: Internet.