Faith the life of science. An address delivered before the Pi Beta Phi Society of Union College, Schenectady, N.Y., July, 1838.

Mode of access: Internet.

A discourse, pronounced at Schenectady, July 22, 1845 : on the fiftieth anniversary of the foundation of Union College /

Cover title: Dr. Potter's semi-centennial discourse.

The whole of the documentary evidence, relative to the controversy between the Regents of the University and the Trustees of Union College, together with the opinion of the late chief justice and other counsel.

Appendix, p. [55]-72 has special title-page.

Abu Ben Aladdin: a just-so night; being a paper read before the English Club of Union College at its second annual banquet, held in the Rose Room of the Twentieth Century Lunch in Schenectady, New York, on the twentieth day of December, MDCCCCXX.

"Of this edition seventy-eight copies have been printed on Italian handmade paper."

Address of students in Union College, to their parents & guardians.

Pamphlet.

The true aim of life. An oration, before the literary societies of Union college. July 24, 1849.

Errata slip attached to t.-p.

The American citizen : his true position, character and duties, a discourse, delivered before the senate of Union college, at Schenectady, 26th July, 1847.

Mode of access: Internet.

Hebrew Union College jubilee volume : (1875 - 1925)

board of editors: David Philipson ... [et al.]

"Hebrew Union College Journal" [Rezension]

C.

The Legal Status and Influence of Decisions of International Organizations and other Bodies in the European Union. College of Europe Research Paper in Law 01/2014

Introduction. The European Union’s external action is not only defined by its influence on international developments, but also by its ability and the need to respond to those developments. While traditionally many have stressed the EU’s ‘autonomy’, over the years its ‘dependence’ on global developments has become more clear.2 International law has continued to play a key role in, not only in the EU’s external relations, but also in the Union’s own legal order.3 The purpose of this paper is not to assess the role or performance of the EU in international institutions.4 Rather it purports to reverse the picture and focus on a somewhat under-researched topic: the legal status of decisions of international organizations in the EU’s legal order.5 While parts of the status of these decisions relate to the status of international agreements and international customary law, it can be argued that decisions of international organizations and other international bodies form a distinct category. In fact, it has been observed that “this phenomenon has added a new layer of complexity to the already complex law of external relations of the European Union”.6 Emerging questions relate to the possible difference between decisions of international organizations of which the EU is a member (such as the FAO) and decisions of organizations where it is not (irrespective of existing competences in that area – such as in the ILO). Questions also relate to the hierarchical status of these decisions in the EU’s legal order and to the possibility of them being invoked in direct or indirect actions before the Court of Justice. This contribution takes a broad perspective on decisions of international organizations by including decisions taken in other international institutions which do not necessarily comply with the standard definition of international organizations,7 be it bodies set-up by multilateral conventions or informal (transnational / regulatory) bodies. Some of these bodies are relatively close to the EU (such as the Councils established by Association Agreements – see further Section 5 below); others operate at a certain distance. Limiting the analysis to formal international organizations will not do justice to the manifold relationships between the European Union and various international bodies and to the effects of the norms produced by these bodies. The term ‘international decisions’ is therefore used to refer to any normative output of international institutional arrangements.

The Court of Justice of the European Union. College of Europe Research Paper in Law 02/2014

The Court of Justice of the European Union is one of the institutions of the Union. Praised by some as the relentless and steady motor of European integration and attacked by others as an example of a clearly biased institution, more ink has perhaps been spilled over the years on discussing the (de)merits of the Court of Justice than any other Union institution. In face of such considerable literature coming from legal, political science, sociological, and more recently also historical quarters, this chapter cannot but scratch the surface of the vast topic by providing a concise introduction into selected institutional themes in a legal1 and, where possible, diachronic perspective: the structure of the Union courts located in Luxembourg; basic information about the type of judicial business the Court of Justice carries out; the composition of the Court of Justice, including the recent changes made to the way in which judges and advocates-general are selected; the often discussed style and structure of the judgments; and, finally, the even more frequently discussed and recurring question of the legitimacy of the Court of Justice.

Modern benevolence: a satire, delivered before the Associated alumni of Union College. July 25th, 1860.

In verse.

Dilucidario del verdadero espiritu, en que se declara que sea espiritu verdadero de donde mana y sus grados : Tratase de la union, extasis, rapto, visiones y reuelaciones ... y se comprueua y declara la dotrina de los libros de la Madre Teresa de Iesus, y de otros libros espirituales /

Mode of access: Internet.

Industrial Removal Office records undated, 1899-1922

Contains Board of Directors minutes (1903, 1907), Executive Committee minutes (1907), Removal Committee minutes (1903-1917), Annual Reports (1910, 1913), Monthly Reports (1901-1919), Monthly Bulletins (1914-1915), studies of those removed, Bressler's "The Removal Work, Including Galveston," and several papers relating to the IRO and immigration. Financial papers include a budget (1914), comparative per capita cost figures (1909-1922), audits (1915-1918), receipts and expenditures (1918-1922), investment records, bank balances (1907-1922), removal work cash book (1904-1911), office expenses cash account (1903-1906), and the financial records of other agencies working with the IRO (1906). Includes also removal case records of first the Jewish Agricultural Society (1899-1900), and then of the IRO (1901-1922) when it took over its work, family reunion case records (1901-1904), and the follow-up records of persons removed to various cities (1903-1914). Contains also the correspondence of traveling agents' contacts throughout the U.S. from 1905-1914, among them Stanley Bero, Henry P. Goldstein, Philip Seman, and Morris D. Waldman.