Tenacity and silk investment of two orb weavers: considerations about diversification of the Araneoidea

Orbiculariae consists of two major clades: the cribellate Deinopidea and the much more diverse ecribellate Araneoidea. It has been hypothesized that the higher diversity of Araneoidea is a consequence of the superiority of the viscid orb web. However, this explanation seems incomplete: for example, cribellate silk may perform better than viscid silk in some contexts. Here, we consider the hypothesis that the diversification of Araneoidea was facilitated by changes in microhabitat occupation behavior due to the cheaper viscid orb web. In the present work we investigate the idea that the reduction in site tenacity caused by the emergence of the viscid orb web has led to an increase in the exploration of different resources and to a greater diversification of the Arancoidea through the evolutionary time. To test this idea, we evaluated the response of one cribellate orb web spider (Zosis geniculata Olivier 1789, Uloboridae) and one ecribellate orb web spider (Metazygia rogenhoferi Keyserling 1878, Arancidae) to abrupt prey absence. The changes in site tenacity and the day-to-day investment in web silk were evaluated. Spiders with three-dimensional webs tend to exhibit greater site tenacity than spiders making orb webs. Zosis geniculata and M. rogenhoferi show similar site tenacity when prey is ample. When prey is unavailable, the tenacity of the cribellate species increases while the tenacity of the ecribellate remains unchanged, and the silk investment of both species decreases. However, this decrease in silk investment is more extensive in Z. geniculata. These results coincide with the idea that a less costly ecribellate orb web leads to a lower tenacity and suggest that more frequent microhabitat abandonment in a context of insect radiation (Neiptera) leads to more diverse and opportunistic exploration of microhabitats that, in the long term, may be one explanation for the greater Araneoidea diversification.

Resting metabolic rates of two orbweb spiders: A first approach to evolutionary success of ecribellate spiders

Spiders are considered conservative with regard to their resting metabolic rate, presenting the same allometric relation with body mass as the majority of land-arthropods. Nevertheless, web-building is thought to have a great impact on the energetic metabolism, and any modification that affects this complex behavior is expected to have an impact over the daily energetic budget. We analyzed the possibility of the presence of the cribellum having an effect on the allometric relation between resting metabolic rate and body mass for an ecribellate species (Zosis geniculata) and a cribellate one (Metazygia rogenhoferi), and employed a model selection approach to test if these species had the same allometric relationship as other land-arthropods. Our results show that M. rogenhoferi has a higher resting metabolic rate, while Z. geniculata fitted the allometric prediction for land arthropods. This indicates that the absence of the cribellum is associated with a higher resting metabolic rate, thus explaining the higher promptness to activity found for the ecribellate species. If our result proves to be a general rule among spiders, the radiation of Araneoidea could be connected to a more energy-consuming life style. Thus, we briefly outline an alternative model of diversification of Araneoidea that accounts for this possibility. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Inventário da araneofauna (Arachnida, Araneae) de serapilheria na Estação Científica Ferreira Penna, Pará, Brasil

A Estação Científica Ferreira Penna (ECFP), com aproximadamente 33.000 hectares, está localizada na Floresta Nacional de Caxiuanã, Pará. Com o objetivo de implementar um protocolo estruturado de inventario da fauna de aranhas de serapilheira da ECFP, foi obtido um total de 400 amostras concentradas de 1m² de serapilheira, nos períodos chuvoso e seco. As aranhas foram segregadas através da combinação das técnicas de triagem manual e de extratores de Winkler. Estas amostras foram provenientes de cinco parcelas. Três parcelas estão localizadas em mata de terra firme (LBA-EXP, LBA-CON e TF-IMC) e duas em mata de igapó (1G-N e IG-S). Uma das parcelas de terra firme sofre estresse hídrico (LBA-EXP), sendo a chuva excluída do solo por meio de painéis e calhas. Foram coletados 2230 indivíduos (5,6 indivíduos / m², em média), pertencentes a 34 famílias. Sete famílias foram representadas apenas por animais imaturos: Nesticidae, Pisauridae, Gnaphosidae, Mimetidae, Deinopidae, Oxiopidae, Uloboridae. As famílias mais abundantes foram Salticidae, Theridiidae, Ctenidae, Oonopidae e Linyphiidae. Foi obtido um total de 876 indivíduos adultos, atribuídos a 120 espécies ou morfo-espécies, em 27 famílias. As espécies com maior abundância relativa foram Styposis sp.3 (Theridiidae) com 16,55% do total de indivíduos adultos, Pseudanapis sp.1 (Anapidae) com 6,96%, Meioneta sp.1 (Linyphiidae) com 6,39%, Oonopidae sp.1 com 5,59% e Salticidae sp.1 com 4,56%. Para a maioria das análises, foram excluídas 15 espécies consideradas como ocasionais na serapilheira. As curvas de acumulação de espécies observadas para o total de amostras e para cada uma das parcelas não atingiram assíntotas ao final da adição de amostras. Os padrões de abundância e incidência destas espécies indicam a existência de uma riqueza real de 123 a 184 espécies. As maiores estimativas de riqueza em espécies foram encontradas na parcela LBA-EXP (75 - 110 espécies). As menores estimativas foram observadas em IG-N (25 - 59 espécies). Apesar da riqueza em espécies e a abundância de aranhas ter sido maior na parcela LBA-EXP, a diversidade foi maior nas parcelas LBA-CON e TF-IMC. A diversidade no igapó foi mais baixa do que na terra firme. A composição de espécies diferiu entre os ambientes de terra firme e igapó, de acordo com coeficientes de similaridade e complementaridade percentual. A abundância e a riqueza de espécies de aranhas de serapilheira aumentam no período seco e diminuem com o aumento da umidade residual do solo.

Spider Venoms Potentially Lethal to Humans

Spiders have one pair of venom glands, and only a few families have reduced them completely (Uloboridae, Holarchaeidae) or modified them to another function (Symphytognathidae or Scytodidae, see Suter and Stratton 2013). All other 42,000 known spider species (99%) utilize their venom to inject it into prey items, which subsequently become paralysed or are killed. Spider venom is a complex mixture of hundreds of components, many of them interacting with cell membranes or receptors located mainly in the nervous or muscular system (Herzig and King 2013). Spider venom, as it is today, has a 300-million-yearlong history of evolution and adaptation and can be considered as an optimized tool to subdue prey. In Mesothelae, the oldest spider group with less than 100 species, the venom glands lie in the anterior part of the cheliceral basal segment. They are very small and do not support the predation process very effectively. In Mygalomorphae, the venom glands are well developed and fill the basal cheliceral segment more or less completely. Many of these 3,000 species are medium- to large-/very large-sized spiders, and they have created the image of being dangerous beasts, attacking and killing a variety of animals, including humans. Although this picture is completely wrong, it is persistent and contributes considerably to human arachnophobia. The third group of spiders, Araneomorphae or “modern spiders”, comprises 93% of all spider species. The venom glands are enlarged and extend to the prosoma; the openings of the venom ducts are moved from the convex to the concave side of the cheliceral fangs and enlarged as well. These changes save the chelicerae from the necessity of being large, and hence, on the average, araneomorph spiders are much smaller than mygalomorphs. Nevertheless, they possess relatively large venom glands, situated mainly in the prosoma, and may also have rather potent venom.

Main Components of Spider Venoms

Venom glands are alreadypresent in theoldes t spider group, the Mesothelae. Theglands lie in the anterior portion of the cheliceral basal segment but are very small, and it is doubtful how much the venom contributes to the predatory success. In mygalomorph spiders, the well-developed venom glands are still in the basal segment of the chelicerae and produce powerful venom that is injected via the cheliceral fangs into a victim. In all other spiders (Araneomorphae), the venom glands have become much larger and reach into the prosoma where they can take up a considerable proportion of this body part. Only a few spiders have reduced their venom glands, either partially or completely (Uloboridae, Holarchaeidae and Symphytognathidae are usually mentioned) or modified them significantly (Scytodidae, see Suter and Stratton 2013). As well as using venom, spiders may also use their chelicerae to overwhelm an item of prey. It is primarily a question of size whether a spider chews up small arthropods without applying venom or if it injects venom first. Very small and/or defenceless arthropods are picked up and crashed with the chelicerae, while larger, dangerous or well-defended items are carefully approached and only attacked with venom injection. Some spiders specialize on prey groups, such as noctuid moths (several genera of bola spiders among Araneidae), web spiders (Mimetidae), ants (Zodarion species in Zodariidae, aphantochiline thomisids, several genera among Theridiidae, Salticidae, Clubionidae and Gnaphosidae) or termites (Ammoxenidae). However, these more or less monophagous species amount only to roughly 2 % of all known spider species, while 98 % are polyphagous. From these considerations, it follows that the majority of spider venoms are not tailored to any given invertebrate or insect group but are rather unspecialized to be effective over a broad spectrum of prey types that spiders naturally encounter.