A new neuropsychological instrument measuring effects of age and drugs on fitness to drive: development, reliability, and validity of MedDrive

Background: Current guidelines underline the limitations of existing instruments to assess fitness to drive and the poor adaptability of batteries of neuropsychological tests in primary care settings. Aims: To provide a free, reliable, transparent computer based instrument capable of detecting effects of age or drugs on visual processing and cognitive functions. Methods: Relying on systematic reviews of neuropsychological tests and driving performances, we conceived four new computed tasks measuring: visual processing (Task1), movement attention shift (Task2), executive response, alerting and orientation gain (Task3), and spatial memory (Task4). We then planned five studies to test MedDrive's reliability and validity. Study-1 defined instructions and learning functions collecting data from 105 senior drivers attending an automobile club course. Study-2 assessed concurrent validity for detecting minor cognitive impairment (MCI) against useful field of view (UFOV) on 120 new senior drivers. Study-3 collected data from 200 healthy drivers aged 20-90 to model age related normal cognitive decline. Study-4 measured MedDrive's reliability having 21 healthy volunteers repeat tests five times. Study-5 tested MedDrive's responsiveness to alcohol in a randomised, double-blinded, placebo, crossover, dose-response validation trial including 20 young healthy volunteers. Results: Instructions were well understood and accepted by all senior drivers. Measures of visual processing (Task1) showed better performances than the UFOV in detecting MCI (ROC 0.770 vs. 0.620; p=0.048). MedDrive was capable of explaining 43.4% of changes occurring with natural cognitive decline. In young healthy drivers, learning effects became negligible from the third session onwards for all tasks except for dual tasking (ICC=0.769). All measures except alerting and orientation gain were affected by blood alcohol concentrations. Finally, MedDrive was able to explain 29.3% of potential causes of swerving on the driving simulator. Discussion and conclusions: MedDrive reveals improved performances compared to existing computed neuropsychological tasks. It shows promising results both for clinical and research purposes.

Mouvement biologique et entraînement perceptivo-cognitif chez les personnes âgées

Lorsque nous cherchons un ami dans une foule ou attendons un proche sur le quai d’une gare, l’identification de cette personne nous est souvent possible grâce à la reconnaissance de sa démarche. Plusieurs chercheurs se sont intéressés à la façon de se mouvoir de l’être humain en étudiant le mouvement biologique. Le mouvement biologique est la représentation, par un ensemble structuré de points lumineux animés, des gestes d’un individu en mouvement dans une situation particulière (marche, golf, tennis, etc.). Une des caractéristiques du patron de mouvement biologique peu étudiée et néanmoins essentielle est sa taille. La plupart des études concernées utilisent des patrons de petite taille correspondant à une personne située à 16 mètres de l’observateur. Or les distances d’interaction sociale, chez l’humain, sont généralement inférieures à 16 mètres. D’autre part, les résultats des études portant sur la perception des patrons de mouvement biologique et le vieillissement demeurent contradictoires. Nous avons donc, dans un premier temps, évalué, dans une voûte d’immersion en réalité virtuelle, l’importance de la distance entre l’observateur et le patron de mouvement biologique, chez des adultes jeunes et des personnes âgées. Cette étude a démontré que l’évaluation de la direction de mouvement d’un patron devient difficile pour les personnes âgées lorsque le patron est situé à moins de 4 mètres, alors que les résultats des jeunes sont comparables pour toutes distances, à partir d’un mètre et au-delà. Cela indique que les gens âgés peinent à intégrer l’information occupant une portion étendue de leur champ visuel, ce qui peut s’avérer problématique dans des espaces où les distances d’interaction sont inférieures à 4 mètres. Nombre de recherches indiquent aussi clairement que les gens âgés s’adaptent difficilement à des situations complexes. Nous avons donc cherché, dans un second temps, à minimiser ces altérations liées à l’âge de l’intégration des processus complexes, en utilisant une tâche adaptée à l’entraînement et à l’évaluation de l’intégration de ces processus : la poursuite multiple d’objets dans l’espace ou 3D-MOT (3 Dimensions Multiple Object Tracking). Le 3D-MOT consiste à suivre simultanément plusieurs objets d’intérêt en mouvement parmi des distracteurs également en mouvement. Nous avons évalué les habiletés de participants jeunes et âgés à une telle tâche dans un environnement virtuel en 3D en déterminant la vitesse maximale de déplacement des objets à laquelle la tâche pouvait être exécutée. Les résultats des participants âgés étaient initialement inférieurs à ceux des jeunes. Cependant, après plusieurs semaines d’entraînement, les personnes âgées ont obtenu des résultats comparables à ceux des sujets jeunes non entraînés. Nous avons enfin évalué, pour ces mêmes participants, l’impact de cet entraînement sur la perception de patrons de mouvement biologique présentés à 4 et 16 mètres dans l’espace virtuel : les habiletés des personnes âgées entraînées obtenues à 4 mètres ont augmenté de façon significative pour atteindre le niveau de celles obtenues à 16 mètres. Ces résultats suggèrent que l’entraînement à certaines tâches peut réduire les déclins cognitivo-perceptifs liés à l’âge et possiblement aider les personnes âgées dans leurs déplacements quotidiens.

Assessing visual fields for driving in patients with paracentral scotomata

Background: The binocular Esterman visual field test (EVFT) is the current visual field test for driving in the UK. Merging of monocular field tests (Integrated Visual Field, IVF) has been proposed as an alternative for glaucoma patients. Aims: To examine the level of agreement between the EVFT and IVF for patients with binocular paracentral scotomata, caused by either ophthalmological or neurological conditions, and to compare outcomes with useful field of view (UFOV) performance, a test of visual attention thought to be important in driving. Methods: 60 patients with binocular paracentral scotomata but normal visual acuity (VA) were recruited prospectively. Subjects completed and were classified as “pass” or “fail” for the EVFT, IVF and UFOV. Results: Good agreement occurred between the EVFT and IVF in classifying subjects as “pass” or “fail” (kappa?=?0.84). Classifications disagreed for four subjects with paracentral scotomata of neurological origin (three “passed” IVF yet “failed” EVFT). Mean UFOV scores did not differ between those who “passed” and those who “failed” both visual field tests (p?=?0.11). Agreement between the visual field tests and UFOV was limited (EVFT kappa?=?0.22, IVF kappa 0.32). Conclusions: Although the IVF and EVFT agree well in classifying visual fields with regard to legal fitness to drive in the UK, the IVF “passes” some individuals currently classed as unfit to drive due to paracentral scotomata of non-glaucomatous origin. The suitability of the UFOV for assessing crash risk in those with visual field loss is questionable.

A comparison between static and kinetic visual attention as a means of detecting age-related deterioration of the visual system and driving performance

A critical review of previous research revealed that visual attention tests, such as the Useful Field of View (UFOV) test, provided the best means of detecting age-related changes to the visual system that could potentially increase crash risk. However, the question was raised as to whether the UFOV, which was regarded as a static visual attention test, could be improved by inclusion of kinetic targets that more closely represent the driving task. A computer program was written to provide more information about the derivation of UFOV test scores. Although this investigation succeeded in providing new information, some of the commercially protected UFOV test procedures still remain unknown. Two kinetic visual attention tests (DRTS1 and 2), developed at Aston University to investigate inclusion of kinetic targets in visual attention tests, were introduced. The UFOV was found to be more repeatable than either of the kinetic visual attention tests and learning effects or age did not influence these findings. Determinants of static and kinetic visual attention were explored. Increasing target eccentricity led to reduced performance on the UFOV and DRTS1 tests. The DRTS2 was not affected by eccentricity but this may have been due to the style of presentation of its targets. This might also have explained why only the DRTS2 showed laterality effects (i.e. better performance to targets presented on the left hand side of the road). Radial location, explored using the UFOV test, showed that subjects responded best to targets positioned to the horizontal meridian. Distraction had opposite effects on static and kinetic visual attention. While UFOV test performance declined with distraction, DRTS1 performance increased. Previous research had shown that this striking difference was to be expected. Whereas the detection of static targets is attenuated in the presence of distracting stimuli, distracting stimuli that move in a structured flow field enhances the detection of moving targets. Subjects reacted more slowly to kinetic compared to static targets, longitudinal motion compared to angular motion and to increased self-motion. However, the effects of longitudinal motion, angular motion, self-motion and even target eccentricity were caused by target edge speed variations arising because of optic flow field effects. The UFOV test was more able to detect age-related changes to the visual system than were either of the kinetic visual attention tests. The driving samples investigated were too limited to draw firm conclusions. Nevertheless, the results presented showed that neither the DRTS2 nor the UFOV tests were powerful tools for the identification of drivers prone to crashes or poor driving performance.

Examining links between cognitive markers, movement initiation and change, and pedestrian safety in older adults

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which mobility indices (such as walking speed and postural sway), motor initiation, and cognitive function, specifically executive functions, including spatial planning, visual attention, and within participant variability, differentially predicted collisions in the near and far sides of the road with increasing age. Methods: Adults aged over 45 years participated in cognitive tests measuring executive function and visual attention (using Useful Field of View; UFoV®), mobility assessments (walking speed, sit-to-stand, self-reported mobility, and postural sway assessed using motion capture cameras), and gave road crossing choices in a two-way filmed real traffic pedestrian simulation. Results: A stepwise regression model of walking speed, start-up delay variability, and processing speed) explained 49.4% of the variance in near-side crossing errors. Walking speed, start-up delay measures (average & variability), and spatial planning explained 54.8% of the variance in far-side unsafe crossing errors. Start-up delay was predicted by walking speed only (explained 30.5%). Conclusion: Walking speed and start-up delay measures were consistent predictors of unsafe crossing behaviours. Cognitive measures, however, differentially predicted near-side errors (processing speed), and far-side errors (spatial planning). These findings offer potential contributions for identifying and rehabilitating at-risk older pedestrians.