Symphonies, pour orgue /

v.1: op.13, no.1, ut--v.2: op.13, no.2, ré--v.3: op.13, no.3, mi--v.4: op.13, no.4, fa--v.5: op.42, no.5, fa--v.6: op.42, no.6, sol--v.7: op.42, no.7, la--v.8: op.42, no.8, si--v.9: op.73, Romane--v.10: op.81, Sacra.

Symphony no. III in E minor for the organ, op. 13. [music] /

Mode of access: Internet.

Symphonies pour orgue, op. 13

Mode of access: Internet.

Symphonies, op. 13 et 42, pour orgue.

Cover title.

Symphonie de Noel : de la serie "Cathedrale" pour orgue, op. 19 /

Vigile de la fête.--Vers la Crèche.--L'adoration mystique.--Final. Dies laetitiae.

Symphonie VII, op. 42 /

Caption title.

1e symphonie, pour grand orgue, op. 14 /

Mode of access: Internet.

3ème symphonie : pour orgue, op. 28 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Quatrième symphonie pour orgue /

Mode of access: Internet.

1ère symphonie pour grand orgue, op. 14

Mode of access: Internet.

Symphony no. 3 : in C minor, Opus 78, for orchestra with organ /

Mode of access: Internet.

The organ works of Kaikhosru Shapurji Sorabji (1892-1988)

This is the first complete critical edition of the organ works of Kaikhosru Shapurji Sorabji (1892--‐1988). Of the three solo symphonies presented here only the first has previously appeared in print (Curwen, 1925). The other two works, both of hugely greater dimensions than the first, have not been published before although, in the late 1980s/early 90s, the present writer produced a hand‐copied edition of the second symphony that has been available in print form and in PDF through the Sorabji Archive since 1991.

Landscape symphonies : gardening as a source of landscape architecture practice engaged with change

The notion of designing with change constitutes a fundamental and foundational theoretical premise for much of what constitutes landscape architecture, notably through engagement with ecology, particularly since the work of Ian McHarg in the 1960s and his key text Design with Nature. However, while most if not all texts in landscape architecture would cite this engagement of change theoretically, few go any further than citation, and when they do their methods seem fixated on utilising empirical, quantitative scientific tools for doing so, rather than the tools of design, in an architectural sense, as implied by the name of the discipline, landscape architecture.

Disclosing donation decisions : the role of organ donor prototypes in an extended theory of planned behaviour

This study explored the role of donor prototype evaluations (perceptions of the typical organ donor) in organ donation communication decisions using an extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model. The model incorporated attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, moral norm, self-identity, and donor prototype evaluations to predict intentions to record consent on an organ donor register and discuss the organ donation decision with significant others. Participants completed surveys assessing the extended TPB constructs related to registering (n = 359) and discussing (n = 282). Results supported a role for donor prototype evaluations in predicting discussing intentions only. Both extended TPB structural equation models were a good fit to the data, accounting for 74 and 76% of the variance in registering and discussing intentions, respectively. Participants’ self-reported discussing behaviour (but not registering behaviour given low numbers of behavioural performers) was assessed 4 weeks later, with discussing intention as the only significant predictor of behaviour (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.11). These findings highlight the impact of people's perceptions of a typical donor on their decisions to discuss their organ donation preference, assisting our understanding of the factors influencing individuals' communication processes in efforts to bridge the gap between organ supply and demand.

Exploring donation decisions: Beliefs and preferences for organ donation in Australia

We explored common beliefs and preferences for posthumous and living organ donation in Australia where organ donation rates are low and little research exists. Content analysis of discussions revealed the advantage of prolonging/saving life whereas disadvantages differed according to donation context. A range of people/groups perceived to approve and disapprove of donation were identified. Barriers for posthumous donation included a family’s objection, with the type of organ needed important for living donation. Motivators included knowledge about potential organ recipients. Donation preferences favored loved ones, with weaker preferences for recipients who were perceived as morally questionable or responsible for their illness.